Invalidity dossier

US 11505231

Removable seat attachment for a stroller

Current assignee: Unified Patents

Added 5/14/2026, 6:01:40 AM

IndustryOther (O)
At a glanceNo PTAB challenges2 lawsuits on fileasserted by Unified PatentsOther (O)

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

US Patent 11505231, titled "Removable seat attachment for a stroller," was filed on July 29, 2022, and issued on November 22, 2022. The inventor is Mark Zehfuss. The original assignee was Baby Jogger LLC, with the current assignee being Baby Jogger II LLC.

Abstract:
The patent describes stroller systems with removable seats. An example stroller includes rear wheels, front wheels, a handle, and a frame with support portions for the rear and front wheels, connected by a folding mechanism. A main stroller seat support is positioned at a first vertical position near the handle. A front seat attachment is designed to attach to the front wheel support portion at a second vertical position, substantially lower than the first. This front seat attachment is configured to support a front stroller seat primarily over the front wheels, ensuring the stroller system's center of gravity remains between the front and rear wheels.

Plain-Language Overview of Independent Claims:

  • Claim 1 (System Claim): This claim describes a stroller system with a main frame, including front and rear wheels, a handle, and a folding mechanism. The frame has a primary seat support near the handle at a higher vertical position. The key feature is a separate front seat attachment that connects to the front wheel support at a lower vertical position. This attachment is specifically designed to hold an additional front stroller seat mainly over the front wheels, ensuring the stroller's balance (center of gravity) is maintained between all wheels.
  • Claim 13 (Method Claim): This claim outlines a method for converting a single stroller into a double stroller. It involves starting with a standard stroller (as described in Claim 1) and then attaching a front seat attachment to the front wheel support. This attachment is placed at a lower vertical position than the original seat, and it supports an additional front stroller seat primarily over the front wheels, thus keeping the stroller balanced.
  • Claim 14 (System Claim): Similar to Claim 1, this claim describes a stroller system with a frame, wheels, handle, and folding mechanism, where a primary seat support is at a higher vertical position. The distinction here is the inclusion of a "removable seat attachment adapter" that can be decoupled from the front wheel support at a lower vertical position. This adapter is designed to support an additional front stroller seat largely over the front wheels, maintaining the stroller's center of gravity between the front and rear wheels.
  • Claim 15 (Method Claim): This claim describes a method for converting a single stroller to a double stroller using a removable seat attachment adapter. It involves providing a stroller with the basic frame and seat setup, then "removably coupling" the adapter to the front wheel support at a lower vertical position. This adapter, in turn, supports an additional front stroller seat over the front wheels to ensure the system's balance.

USPTO and CAFC 2026 Dockets:
The patent is currently active. Publicly available information indicates that there is ongoing litigation related to this patent family, including:

  • A PTAB case (IPR2025-01095) was filed, but not instituted (procedural).
  • US cases have been filed in the Massachusetts District Court (1:24-cv-11582) and the Delaware District Court (1:24-cv-00725, 1:24-cv-00723).
  • The first worldwide family litigation was filed in 2024.

As of April 26, 2026, a search for "CAFC 2026 dockets US11505231" did not yield any specific dockets or cases currently pending before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for the year 2026.

Generated 5/17/2026, 12:47:07 AM

Cases on file (2)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 11505231. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

Known litigation involving US patent 11505231 includes:

  1. PTAB Case:

    • Case Number: IPR2025-01095
    • Plaintiff(s): Unified Patents
    • Defendant(s): Baby Jogger II LLC (current assignee of the patent)
    • Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided text, but the case number IPR2025-01095 implies a filing year of 2025.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Not Instituted - Procedural
  2. US District Court Case (Massachusetts):

    • Jurisdiction: Massachusetts District Court
    • Case Number: 1:24-cv-11582
    • Plaintiff(s): Not specified in the provided text.
    • Defendant(s): Not specified in the provided text.
    • Filing Date: Not specified in the provided text, but the case number implies a filing year of 2024.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Litigation
  3. US District Court Case (Delaware):

    • Jurisdiction: Delaware District Court
    • Case Number: 1:24-cv-00725
    • Plaintiff(s): Not specified in the provided text.
    • Defendant(s): Not specified in the provided text.
    • Filing Date: Not specified in the provided text, but the case number implies a filing year of 2024.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Litigation
  4. US District Court Case (Delaware):

    • Jurisdiction: Delaware District Court
    • Case Number: 1:24-cv-00723
    • Plaintiff(s): Not specified in the provided text.
    • Defendant(s): Not specified in the provided text.
    • Filing Date: Not specified in the provided text, but the case number implies a filing year of 2024.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Litigation
  5. First Worldwide Family Litigation:

    • Jurisdiction: Global (Darts-ip link provided for details)
    • Case Number: Not provided in the summary.
    • Plaintiff(s): Not specified in the provided text.
    • Defendant(s): Not specified in the provided text.
    • Filing Date: Not specified in the provided text.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Litigation

Generated 5/17/2026, 12:47:00 AM

Proceedings on file (1)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Unified Patents

1 discretionary denial
Discretionary Denial
Filed
Jun 6, 2025
Last modified
Jan 5, 2026
Petitioner
Baby Generation, Inc. d/b/a Mockingbird et al.
Inventor
Mark ZEHFUSS

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

✓ Generated

Proceedings overview

One AIA trial proceeding has been filed against US patent 11505231. The proceeding concluded with a discretionary denial, meaning no claims were challenged on the merits and the patent owner prevailed at the institution stage. This gives a defendant a stronger defensive posture as the patent claims remain untested by this specific inter partes review.

IPR2025-01095 — Baby Generation, Inc. d/b/a Mockingbird et al. v. Baby Jogger II LLC

  • Type: Inter Partes Review
  • Filed: 2025-06-06
  • Status: Discretionary Denial — the petition for inter partes review was denied institution by the PTAB.
  • Judge panel: Not publicly available without accessing the full institution decision.
  • Petition grounds: The petition was filed by Baby Generation, Inc. d/b/a Mockingbird et al. against Mark Zehfuss (inventor), who had assigned the patent to Baby Jogger, LLC, and subsequently to Baby Jogger II, LLC. Specific claims, prior art, and statutory bases (§ 102 / § 103 / § 112) are not immediately apparent from the public status but would be detailed in the petition and institution decision.
  • Institution decision: Denied (Discretionary Denial) — 2026-01-05. The panel's reasoning for discretionary denial would be outlined in the full decision. Common reasons include prior art raised in parallel district court litigation (e.g., NHK Seating of Am., Inc. v. Intapco Seating, Inc.) or other factors leading the Board to decline institution even if a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits might otherwise exist.
  • Final Written Decision: No Final Written Decision was issued because institution was denied.
  • Settlement / termination: The proceeding was terminated via discretionary denial of institution, not settlement.
  • Appeal: No appeal to the Federal Circuit is possible from a denial of institution, as such denials are generally unreviewable.
  • Defensive value: The patent owner successfully prevented the institution of this IPR, meaning the patent's claims were not adjudicated on the merits in this proceeding. For a defendant, this signifies that the specific grounds raised by Baby Generation, Inc. d/b/a Mockingbird et al. were not successful in getting the IPR started, potentially making those same grounds more difficult to pursue in a future IPR by a privy.

Strategic summary

No claims of US11505231 have been canceled or sustained by a Final Written Decision in an AIA trial proceeding. All claims remain untested by the merits of IPR2025-01095, as institution was denied.

The estoppel landscape for IPR2025-01095 means that Baby Generation, Inc. d/b/a Mockingbird et al. (and their privies) are barred from raising any ground they raised or reasonably could have raised in this petition against claims of US11505231. For a different defendant facing assertion of this patent, prior art grounds not raised or reasonably available to the petitioner in IPR2025-01095 could still be utilized in a new IPR petition.

Regarding pattern signals, only one IPR has been filed, and it was met with a discretionary denial. The petitioner was "Baby Generation, Inc. d/b/a Mockingbird et al." and the inventor "Mark Zehfuss" (assigned to Baby Jogger II LLC). The status indicates a "critical" litigation in a PTAB case IPR2025-01095 which was filed (Not Instituted - Procedural). There are also ongoing US district court cases in Massachusetts and Delaware. The involvement of Unified Patents as a petitioner in IPR2025-01095 (as noted by the Google Patents page, which likely refers to "Unified Patents PTAB Data") suggests a defensive aggregator is involved, which often aims to invalidate patents for their members. The discretionary denial, however, means this particular attempt was unsuccessful.

Recommended next steps

Given the discretionary denial of IPR2025-01095, no claims were invalidated. The details of the discretionary denial can be found by accessing the institution decision for IPR2025-01095 on the USPTO PTAB End-to-End (E2E) system. This decision would provide the specific reasoning from the judge panel, which is crucial for understanding why institution was denied and whether those reasons might apply to any future IPR attempts by a defendant. The IPR was filed on June 6, 2025, and the discretionary denial was issued on January 5, 2026.

A defendant facing assertion of this patent should:

  1. Obtain and review the full institution decision for IPR2025-01095. This will clarify the exact grounds presented by the petitioner and the Board's specific reasons for discretionary denial. Understanding the Board's reasoning is vital for assessing the viability of future IPR petitions.
  2. Conduct a comprehensive prior art search for any art not raised (or not reasonably able to be raised) by the petitioner in IPR2025-01095.
  3. Evaluate potential new IPR grounds, considering the estoppel implications for the prior art used in the denied petition.
  4. Monitor the ongoing district court litigation associated with this patent to identify any claim constructions or other rulings that could impact validity arguments.

The patent has not been narrowed through PTAB proceedings, leaving all claims formally intact. The existence of an IPR, even if denied institution, is a signal that parties are actively challenging the patent.


Citations:

  1. US11505231B1 - Removable seat attachment for a stroller - Google Patents. https://patents.google.com/patent/US11505231/en
  2. Unified Patents Portal - IPR2025-01095. https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/ptab/case/IPR2025-01095

Generated 5/17/2026, 12:47:07 AM

Ownership chain (2)

Asserters network →

Structured records extracted from the assignment-history narrative below. Each entity links to its full ownership-network profile.

  1. 2022-07-29 · recorded 2022-08-04 · reel 061298/0871 · Assignment

    ZEHFUSS, MARK; LEE, JON HEE; ROE, MEGAN; SIMPSON, STACY NOELBABY JOGGER, LLC

    Correspondent: · Dinsmore & Shohl

    Assignment of invention rights from inventors to the original corporate assignee

  2. 2026-01-23 · recorded 2026-02-12 · reel 062638/0950 · Assignment

    BABY JOGGER, LLCBABY JOGGER II, LLC

    Correspondent: · Dinsmore & Shohl

    Internal corporate restructuring/transfer between related entities

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

✓ Generated

Inventors

The named inventors are Mark Zehfuss, Jon Hee Lee, Megan Roe, and Stacy Noel Simpson. They assigned their interest in the patent application to Baby Jogger, LLC on the filing date of the present application (2022-07-29), indicating they were likely employees or contractors of Baby Jogger, LLC or its predecessors at the time the invention was made.

Original assignee

The original assignee on the filing date of the US11505231 patent was Baby Jogger, LLC. Baby Jogger is an operating company known for designing and manufacturing strollers and related juvenile products, which are products embodying the claims of this patent (e.g., strollers with removable seats). The company's status appears to be active, with a recent internal transfer to "Baby Jogger II, LLC".

Assignment timeline

  1. 2022-07-29 (executed) / recorded 2022-08-04 — Reel 061298/0871

    • Conveyance: Assignment
    • Assignor: ZEHFUSS, MARK; LEE, JON HEE; ROE, MEGAN; SIMPSON, STACY NOEL
    • Assignee: Baby Jogger, LLC
    • Correspondent: Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, 255 E. 5th Street, Suite 1900, Cincinnati, OH 45202. This correspondent also appears on a later assignment in this chain.
    • Context: Assignment of invention rights from inventors to the original corporate assignee.
  2. 2026-01-23 (executed) / recorded 2026-02-12 — Reel 062638/0950

    • Conveyance: Assignment
    • Assignor: Baby Jogger, LLC
    • Assignee: BABY JOGGER II, LLC
    • Correspondent: Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, 255 E. 5th Street, Suite 1900, Cincinnati, OH 45202. This correspondent also appears on an earlier assignment in this chain.
    • Context: Internal corporate restructuring/transfer between related entities.

Timeline diagram

timeline
    title Ownership of US 11505231
    2008 : Priority date
    2022 : Inventors assigned to Baby Jogger LLC
    2022 : Filed by Baby Jogger LLC
    2022 : Issued
    2026 : Assigned to Baby Jogger II LLC

NPE / troll-pattern signals

  1. Shell-entity transferNot present. The transfers are between "Baby Jogger, LLC" and "BABY JOGGER II, LLC", which appear to be related operating entities, not shell entities.
  2. Known asserter in the chainNot present. Neither Baby Jogger, LLC nor BABY JOGGER II, LLC are identified on common NPE lists.
  3. Repeat correspondent across the chainPresent. Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, based in Cincinnati, OH, is listed as the correspondent for both the assignment recorded on 2022-08-04 (Reel 061298/0871) and the assignment recorded on 2026-02-12 (Reel 062638/0950).
  4. Cascading transfersNot present. There are only two assignments (one from inventors, one internal) over approximately three and a half years, which does not indicate rapid cascading transfers.
  5. Pre-litigation transferUnclear. Publicly available information indicates litigation was filed in 2024 and 2025. The first recorded assignment to the original assignee occurred on 2022-07-29 (Reel 061298/0871), well before the reported litigation. A subsequent internal transfer occurred on 2026-01-23 (Reel 062638/0950), after the initial litigation filings. Therefore, this specific transfer was not a pre-litigation transfer to initiate assertion, although it could be related to ongoing litigation strategy.
  6. Bankruptcy fire-saleNot present. There is no indication that Baby Jogger, LLC underwent a bankruptcy sale for this patent.
  7. PrivateeringNot present. The assignments are between closely related operating entities, not to a distinct NPE acting on behalf of a competitor.
  8. Defensive aggregator (anti-NPE)Not present. The chain ends with BABY JOGGER II, LLC, which is not a known defensive aggregator.

Verdict

Operating-company assertion
The patent remains within the corporate structure of Baby Jogger, an operating company known for producing products embodying the patent claims. While litigation has been initiated, the ownership chain indicates these are assertions made by an operating company, not a non-practicing entity.

USPTO Assignment Center search for US11505231: https://assignmentcenter.uspto.gov/patent/11505231

Generated 5/17/2026, 12:47:14 AM

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

✓ Generated

To identify the most relevant prior art for US patent 11505231, I have reviewed the "Prior art citations" section from the Google Patents entry for US11505231 (https://patents.google.com/patent/US11505231/en). It is important to note the priority date of US11505231 is 2008-12-04.

The cited documents can be broadly categorized into two groups: those that are part of the same patent family (i.e., continuations or continuation-in-parts) and those that are not. For claims in US11505231 that are properly entitled to the earliest priority date (2008-12-04), patents within the same family are generally not considered prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102. However, they are highly relevant for understanding the evolution of the claimed invention. Documents outside the patent family with an effective filing or publication date prior to the 2008-12-04 priority date would be considered statutory prior art.

Based on the provided text, the patents US8474228B2, US9944305B2, US9403550B2, and US8955869B2 are direct ancestors in the priority chain of US11505231. Their descriptions are highly relevant to the subject matter of US11505231, but their legal status as anticipatory prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102 depends on whether the claims of US11505231 are entitled to the common earliest priority date.

The other cited applications (US20160272210A1, US20150246604A1, US20160214619A1) have publication dates after the 2008-12-04 priority date of US11505231. Therefore, they would generally not anticipate claims of US11505231 that are entitled to this earliest priority date. They could only potentially anticipate claims that are not entitled to the 2008-12-04 priority date and whose effective filing date falls after their respective publication dates.

Below are the details for each cited reference from the "Prior art citations" section of US11505231:

Prior Art Citations (Family Members/Ancestors)

These documents are explicitly stated as part of the continuation chain of US11505231 and share the earliest priority date of 2008-12-04. While they disclose highly relevant subject matter, they are typically not considered prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102 for claims in US11505231 that are entitled to this common priority date. They are, however, critical for understanding the development of the invention.

  1. US8474228B2

    • Full Citation: U.S. Patent No. 8,474,228 B2 to Zehfuss et al., titled "Methods for converting a single seat stroller into a double seat stroller and associated apparatus," issued July 2, 2013.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Published: 2013-07-02; Filed: 2009-12-04 (application Ser. No. 12/631,375, from which US11505231 claims priority).
    • Brief Description: This patent describes methods and apparatuses for transforming a single-seat stroller into a double-seat configuration using a removable seat attachment. It features a front seat attachment configured to support a second seat at a second vertical position substantially lower than the first seat, positioned over the front wheels to ensure the stroller's center of gravity remains between the front and rear wheels.
    • Potential Anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102: Given its status as a direct ancestor (continuation) of US11505231, this document discloses subject matter highly relevant to the claims of US11505231. This would likely include the general scope of independent claim 1 (stroller system with a lower front seat attachment over front wheels for COG stability), dependent claim 2 (removable front seat attachment), claim 11 (supporting a car seat), and claim 13 (forward/backward facing positions). However, for claims in US11505231 properly entitled to the common priority date of 2008-12-04, this document is not considered anticipatory prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102. If any claims in US11505231 are determined not to be entitled to the 2008-12-04 priority date and their effective filing date is after July 2, 2013, then US8474228B2 could potentially anticipate such claims.
  2. US9944305B2

    • Full Citation: U.S. Patent No. 9,944,305 B2 to Zehfuss et al., titled "Removable seat attachment for a stroller," issued April 17, 2018.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Published: 2018-04-17; Filed: 2016-08-01 (application Ser. No. 15/225,326, from which US11505231 claims priority).
    • Brief Description: This patent details a removable seat attachment for a stroller, enabling its conversion into a multi-seat stroller. It includes descriptions of attachment mechanisms, seat support elements, and various types of seats (e.g., stroller seat, baby seat, bassinet, pram, car seat, or baby carrier) that can be supported.
    • Potential Anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102: As a direct ancestor of US11505231, this patent likely discloses many features pertinent to US11505231's claims, especially those related to interchangeable seat types (claims 11, 13) and more specific attachment mechanisms, potentially including seat attachment housings and adapters (claims 3, 7). For claims in US11505231 properly entitled to the common priority date of 2008-12-04, this document is not considered anticipatory prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102. If any claims in US11505231 are determined not to be entitled to the 2008-12-04 priority date and their effective filing date is after April 17, 2018, then US9944305B2 could potentially anticipate such claims.
  3. US9403550B2

    • Full Citation: U.S. Patent No. 9,403,550 B2 to Zehfuss et al., titled "Removable seat attachment for a stroller," issued August 2, 2016.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Published: 2016-08-02; Filed: 2015-01-15 (application Ser. No. 14/597,420, from which US11505231 claims priority).
    • Brief Description: This patent focuses on a removable seat attachment for converting a single stroller into a double stroller, with an emphasis on positioning the second seat at a lower vertical level, substantially over the front wheels, to maintain the stroller's stability by keeping the center of gravity between the front and rear wheels.
    • Potential Anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102: Another direct ancestor of US11505231, this patent explicitly describes the core concept of independent claim 1, particularly the positioning of the front seat for stability. It would likely disclose features related to claims 1, 2, and potentially 13. For claims in US11505231 properly entitled to the common priority date of 2008-12-04, this document is not considered anticipatory prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102. If any claims in US11505231 are determined not to be entitled to the 2008-12-04 priority date and their effective filing date is after August 2, 2016, then US9403550B2 could potentially anticipate such claims.
  4. US8955869B2

    • Full Citation: U.S. Patent No. 8,955,869 B2 to Zehfuss et al., titled "Removable seat attachment for a stroller," issued February 17, 2015.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Published: 2015-02-17; Filed: 2014-04-25 (application Ser. No. 14/261,558, from which US11505231 claims priority).
    • Brief Description: This patent provides details on a removable seat attachment for converting a single stroller into a multi-seat stroller, covering the support of various seat types and incorporating descriptions of folding and locking mechanisms for the attachment.
    • Potential Anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102: As a direct ancestor of US11505231, this patent likely discloses aspects related to supporting various seat types (claim 11) and mechanical elements like folding mechanisms (e.g., sliding connector 25 and strut 28 in US11505231) and locking mechanisms (e.g., locking mechanism 29 in US11505231), which are relevant to claims 1 and 2. For claims in US11505231 properly entitled to the common priority date of 2008-12-04, this document is not considered anticipatory prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102. If any claims in US11505231 are determined not to be entitled to the 2008-12-04 priority date and their effective filing date is after February 17, 2015, then US8955869B2 could potentially anticipate such claims.

Prior Art Citations (Non-Family Members)

These patent applications are cited, but their publication dates are after the earliest priority date of US11505231 (2008-12-04). Therefore, they are generally not considered statutory prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102 for claims in US11505231 that are entitled to the 2008-12-04 priority date. They would only be relevant as prior art if any claims in US11505231 are not entitled to that early priority date and rely on a later effective filing date that falls after their publication.

  1. US20160272210A1

    • Full Citation: U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2016/0272210 A1 to Gylling et al., titled "Child transportation devices," published September 22, 2016.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Published: 2016-09-22; Filed: 2016-03-21.
    • Brief Description: This application concerns child transportation devices, including strollers and child carriers, and specifically describes adapter assemblies for attaching and detaching child carriers to stroller frames.
    • Potential Anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102: As the publication date is after US11505231's earliest priority date, it is generally not prior art. However, if any claims in US11505231—particularly those detailing the specific design of the "adapter receiving cavity" (claim 3), the "removable seat attachment adapter" (claim 7), or the ability to interchange different seats (claim 11)—are not entitled to the 2008-12-04 priority date and have an effective filing date after March 21, 2016, then this publication could potentially anticipate such claims given its focus on adapter assemblies for child carriers.
  2. US20150246604A1

    • Full Citation: U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0246604 A1 to Meyers et al., titled "Stroller with multi-position removable car seat adapter," published September 3, 2015.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Published: 2015-09-03; Filed: 2015-02-27.
    • Brief Description: This application discloses a stroller equipped with a removable car seat adapter that allows for multiple positioning options, such as forward-facing or rearward-facing orientations.
    • Potential Anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102: As the publication date is after US11505231's earliest priority date, it is generally not prior art. However, if any claims in US11505231, specifically those concerning the support of a car seat (claim 11) or the ability to position a seat in forward or backward facing orientations (claim 13), are not entitled to the 2008-12-04 priority date and have an effective filing date after February 27, 2015, then this publication could potentially anticipate such claims.
  3. US20160214619A1

    • Full Citation: U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2016/0214619 A1 to Lai et al., titled "Stroller," published July 28, 2016.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Published: 2016-07-28; Filed: 2016-01-26.
    • Brief Description: This application describes a stroller system with a frame structure and a seat assembly, highlighting adjustable features and modular components to achieve various stroller configurations.
    • Potential Anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102: As the publication date is after US11505231's earliest priority date, it is generally not prior art. However, if any claims in US11505231, particularly general claims related to stroller frame components (claim 1c), adjustable seats, and modularity for different configurations, are not entitled to the 2008-12-04 priority date and have an effective filing date after January 26, 2016, then this publication could potentially anticipate such claims.

Generated 5/17/2026, 12:47:58 AM

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

✓ Generated

I cannot perform a detailed obviousness analysis under 35 U.S.C. § 103 by combining specific prior art references because the provided "Prior art section" only lists "Prior art keywords" (stroller, seat, attachment, wheel support, support portion) and a "Prior art date" (2008-12-04), but does not enumerate specific prior art patent documents or publications.

A proper obviousness analysis requires identifying specific primary and secondary references that predate the patent's effective filing date (which, based on priority claims, is related to December 4, 2008) and then articulating a motivation for a person having ordinary skill in the art (PHOSITA) to combine the teachings of these specific references. Without these concrete prior art documents, I cannot identify combinations or explain the motivation to combine them.

The "Background" section of the patent does describe existing problems with prior strollers, such as permanently affixed double seats, larger dimensions of double strollers, and issues with detachable covers for existing attachment mechanisms. While this description gives context to the problem the invention aims to solve, it does not provide the specific details of prior art inventions needed for a § 103 analysis.

Therefore, I am unable to fulfill the request to identify combinations of prior art references and explain the motivation to combine them, as the necessary specific prior art documents are not provided in the authoritative text.

Generated 5/17/2026, 12:47:14 AM

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

✓ Generated

I will attempt to access the USPTO Patent Center or Patent Public Search and look up US11505231 to retrieve the requested information. Since I cannot directly interact with a live website, I will infer information from the provided context if specific details for US11505231 cannot be directly found through general searches for PTA/PTE/family members.

Based on the initial Google Patents page for US11505231, I have some information to start:

  • Publication number: US11505231B1
  • Application number: US17/877,323
  • Filing date: 2022-07-29
  • Publication date: 2022-11-22
  • Priority date: 2008-12-04
  • Anticipated expiration: 2029-12-04 (from Google Patents page)

I also have a list of priority claims:

  • Priority claimed from US12/631,375 (2009-12-04)
  • Priority claimed from US15/225,326 (2016-08-01)
  • Priority to US17/877,323 (2022-07-29) - This is the application for the current patent itself.
  • Priority to US18/051,053 (2022-10-31)
  • Priority to US18/534,146 (2023-12-08)

The "CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS" section in the patent text provides a detailed family history:
"This application is a continuation of U.S. patent Application Ser. No. 16/903,292, filed Jun. 16, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/912,901, filed Mar. 6, 2018 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,730,543, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/225,326, filed Aug. 1, 2016 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,944,305, which both (i) claims the benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 62/311,224, filed Mar. 21, 2016, and (ii) is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/597,420, filed Jan. 15, 2015 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,403,550, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/261,558, filed on Apr. 25, 2014 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,955,869, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/631,375, filed Dec. 4, 2009 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,474,228, which claims the benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 61/119,920, filed Dec. 4, 2008, the contents of which are all incorporated herein by reference."

This confirms:

  • Continuation applications: US16/903,292, US15/912,901, US15/225,326, US14/597,420, US14/261,558, US12/631,375.
  • Continuation-in-part applications: US14/597,420 (which is a CIP of US15/225,326 claims benefit from US62/311,224). The text explicitly states 14/597,420 is a CIP of 15/225,326 which seems unusual as CIPs are usually of earlier applications. Let me re-read this carefully. "and (ii) is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/597,420, filed Jan. 15, 2015 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,403,550, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/261,558...". This means 15/225,326 is a CIP of 14/597,420.
  • Provisional applications: US62/311,224 (filed Mar. 21, 2016) and US61/119,920 (filed Dec. 4, 2008).

Earliest Priority Date: The earliest priority claim is from U.S. application Ser. No. 61/119,920, filed December 4, 2008.

Projected Expiration Date (based on 20 years from earliest priority date):
December 4, 2008 + 20 years = December 4, 2028.

However, Google Patents states "Anticipated expiration 2029-12-04". This suggests a PTA of one year, or a different calculation based on a later priority date in the chain, or some other adjustment. The standard rule for utility patents is 20 years from the earliest non-provisional filing date for which a benefit is claimed.

The chain of continuations usually means the 20-year term is from the earliest non-provisional in the chain.
US12/631,375 (filed Dec. 4, 2009) is the earliest non-provisional in the continuation chain that the patent refers to. The provisional application US61/119,920 (filed Dec. 4, 2008) is claimed as a benefit by US12/631,375.
So, if the 20-year term is from the non-provisional filing date of US12/631,375, then December 4, 2009 + 20 years = December 4, 2029. This matches the "Anticipated expiration 2029-12-04" from Google Patents.

Therefore, the anticipated expiration date already takes into account the earliest non-provisional filing in the chain.

Patent Term Adjustments (PTA):
PTA is granted to compensate for certain delays by the USPTO during prosecution. These include delays in issuing a first Office Action or Notice of Allowance, responding to applicant replies, or issuing the patent after the issue fee is paid. The USPTO automatically calculates PTA. Without direct access to the USPTO Patent Center for US11505231, I cannot provide the exact PTA. However, the difference between a simple 20-year calculation from the earliest non-provisional priority date (December 4, 2029) and the "anticipated expiration" (December 4, 2029) from Google Patents suggests there is likely no, or a negligible, PTA that changes the expiration date from the 20-year term from the earliest non-provisional. If the Google Patents "Anticipated expiration" date already includes PTA, then it would be December 4, 2029. If it is only the statutory 20-year term, then any PTA would extend it further. The consistency suggests the Google Patents calculation already considers the earliest priority date and any adjustments.

Patent Term Extensions (PTE):
PTE is available for patents on certain human drugs, food or color additives, medical devices, animal drugs, and veterinary biological products to compensate for delays during regulatory review by agencies like the FDA. Given the subject matter of the patent (stroller attachments), it is highly unlikely to be eligible for PTE.

Divisional Applications:
The "CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS" section lists continuation applications but does not explicitly mention divisional applications. A divisional application is filed for claims that were originally presented in a parent application but were deemed to be directed to a separate invention by the examiner.

Related Family Members:
Based on the "CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS" and the Google Patents page, the related family members include:

  • Applications in the chain leading to US11505231:

    • U.S. patent Application Ser. No. 16/903,292, filed Jun. 16, 2020
    • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/912,901, filed Mar. 6, 2018 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,730,543)
    • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/225,326, filed Aug. 1, 2016 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,944,305)
    • U.S. application Ser. No. 62/311,224, filed Mar. 21, 2016 (provisional)
    • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/597,420, filed Jan. 15, 2015 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,403,550) - noted as a continuation-in-part of 15/225,326, but the chronological order and the text "is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/597,420" suggests 15/225,326 is the CIP of 14/597,420, which is then a continuation of 14/261,558. This is a bit confusing in the provided text. Let me assume the chain of direct continuations is 12/631,375 -> 14/261,558 -> 14/597,420 -> 15/225,326 -> 15/912,901 -> 16/903,292 -> 17/877,323 (US11505231). The CIP reference for 15/225,326 means it includes new subject matter from 14/597,420, but it also benefits from earlier applications in the chain. The earliest priority date for this patent is ultimately the key for calculating the 20-year term.
    • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/261,558, filed on Apr. 25, 2014 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,955,869)
    • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/631,375, filed Dec. 4, 2009 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,474,228)
    • U.S. application Ser. No. 61/119,920, filed Dec. 4, 2008 (provisional)
  • Issued Patents in the family:

  • Other related applications mentioned on Google Patents (not explicitly in the continuation chain to 11505231 but showing priority):

    • US20220371642A1 (publication of application US17/877,323, this is the same application as the patent)
    • US18/051,053 (priority to this application on 2022-10-31, which issued as US11878729B2)
    • US18/534,146 (priority to this application on 2023-12-08, which published as US20240174281A1)

Projected Expiration Date:
The general rule for a utility patent is 20 years from the earliest effective filing date, considering any domestic benefit claims.
The earliest non-provisional application in the chain for which US11505231 claims benefit is US12/631,375, filed December 4, 2009.
Therefore, the statutory 20-year term would end on December 4, 2029.
The Google Patents page lists the "Anticipated expiration" as 2029-12-04, which aligns with the 20-year term from the earliest non-provisional filing date of US12/631,375.
Since PTA can add to this term and there isn't a stated PTA in the Google Patents data, it's possible the "Anticipated expiration" already includes any minor PTA or there was no PTA. Without the official USPTO PAIR/Patent Center document for US11505231, a definitive PTA value cannot be provided. However, the consistency of the 20-year calculation with the "anticipated expiration" suggests no significant PTA was added that would shift the date.

Final check on the continuation-in-part statement: The patent states "which is a continuation of U.S. patent Application Ser. No. 16/903,292, filed Jun. 16, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/912,901, filed Mar. 6, 2018 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,730,543, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/225,326, filed Aug. 1, 2016 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,944,305, which both (i) claims the benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 62/311,224, filed Mar. 21, 2016, and (ii) is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/597,420, filed Jan. 15, 2015 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,403,550, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/261,558, filed on Apr. 25, 2014 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,955,869, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/631,375, filed Dec. 4, 2009 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,474,228, which claims the benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 61/119,920, filed Dec. 4, 2008".

This means US15/225,326 claims benefit from provisional US62/311,224 AND is a CIP of US14/597,420. The chain for the 20-year calculation would trace back to the earliest non-provisional in the main chain, which is US12/631,375, filed Dec 4, 2009. The priority date of the provisional (Dec 4, 2008) is earlier, but the 20-year clock starts from the non-provisional filing date that claims benefit, or its earliest parent non-provisional. Here, US12/631,375 is the earliest non-provisional. So, the 20-year term from December 4, 2009 is correct for the base term.For US Patent 11505231, the following details regarding its term and family members have been identified:

Patent Term Adjustments (PTA):
Specific details regarding Patent Term Adjustments (PTA) for US Patent 11505231 are not publicly available without direct access to the USPTO Patent Center's private PAIR system. However, the anticipated expiration date provided by Google Patents is December 4, 2029. The typical term for a utility patent is 20 years from its earliest effective filing date. Since the earliest non-provisional application in the priority chain for US11505231 was filed on December 4, 2009, a 20-year term would naturally lead to an expiration date of December 4, 2029. This consistency suggests that either no significant PTA was applied, or any adjustment resulted in the same expiration date as the 20-year statutory term from the earliest non-provisional parent. PTA is generally granted to compensate for certain administrative delays by the USPTO during patent prosecution, such as delays in issuing office actions or the patent itself.

Patent Term Extensions (PTE):
Given the subject matter of the patent (removable seat attachment for a stroller), it is highly unlikely to be eligible for Patent Term Extensions (PTE). PTE is typically reserved for patents claiming products, methods of use, or methods of manufacture related to human drugs, medical devices, food additives, color additives, animal drugs, or veterinary biological products that undergo lengthy regulatory review processes by agencies such as the FDA.

Continuation Applications:
US Patent 11505231 is a continuation application itself. Its lineage includes a series of continuation applications:

  • Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/903,292, filed June 16, 2020.
  • Which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/912,901, filed March 6, 2018 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,730,543).
  • Which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/225,326, filed August 1, 2016 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,944,305).
  • Which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/597,420, filed January 15, 2015 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,403,550).
  • Which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/261,558, filed April 25, 2014 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,955,869).
  • Which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/631,375, filed December 4, 2009 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,474,228).

Divisional Applications:
The provided patent text and Google Patents information do not explicitly mention any divisional applications in the family.

Related Family Members:
The patent family related to US11505231, based on the continuation chain and priority claims, includes:

  • Provisional Applications:
    • U.S. application Ser. No. 61/119,920, filed December 4, 2008.
    • U.S. application Ser. No. 62/311,224, filed March 21, 2016.
  • Non-Provisional Applications/Issued Patents in the Direct Chain of US11505231:
    • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/631,375, filed December 4, 2009 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,474,228).
    • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/261,558, filed April 25, 2014 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,955,869).
    • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/597,420, filed January 15, 2015 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,403,550).
    • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/225,326, filed August 1, 2016 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,944,305).
    • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/912,901, filed March 6, 2018 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,730,543).
    • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/903,292, filed June 16, 2020.
    • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/877,323, filed July 29, 2022 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 11,505,231).
  • Other Related Applications (claiming priority from/to US17/877,323):
    • US20220371642A1 (publication of US17/877,323).
    • US18/051,053 (priority to this application on October 31, 2022, issued as US11878729B2).
    • US18/534,146 (priority to this application on December 8, 2023, published as US20240174281A1).

Projected Expiration Date:
The general patent term for utility patents is 20 years from the effective filing date of the earliest non-provisional application for which a benefit is claimed. In this case, the earliest non-provisional application in the priority chain is U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/631,375, filed on December 4, 2009. Therefore, the projected expiration date for US Patent 11505231, assuming no further Patent Term Adjustment or Extension that would alter this date, is December 4, 2029.

Generated 5/17/2026, 12:47:38 AM

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

✓ Generated

Defensive Disclosure: US Patent 11505231 - Removable Seat Attachment for a Stroller

Current Date: April 26, 2026

As a Senior Patent Strategist and Research Engineer specializing in Defensive Publishing, the following constitutes a defensive disclosure for US Patent 11505231, "Removable seat attachment for a stroller." This document aims to establish prior art by detailing numerous variations and extensions of the claimed subject matter, thereby rendering future incremental improvements by competitors obvious or non-novel. The derivatives are constructed from the core inventive concept of a removable/attachable front seat support/attachment/adapter that positions a second seat (or other child conveyance) forward of and lower than the main seat, typically over the front wheels, while maintaining stroller stability.


Derivative Variations for Core Claims (e.g., Claims 1 & 14)

1. Ultra-Lightweight Modular Composite Stroller System with Magnetic Quick-Release

Enabling Description:
A stroller system, based on the principles of US11505231, where the main frame, including the front wheel support portion and the first stroller seat support, as well as the removable front seat attachment, are constructed from a multi-layer carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composite. The CFRP tubing features a tailored ply orientation and variable wall thickness, optimized via Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for stress distribution and vibration dampening, achieving a weight reduction of at least 30% compared to equivalent aluminum alloys (e.g., 6061-T6). The interface for the removable front seat attachment with the main frame's front wheel support portion utilizes a quick-release magnetic latching system. This system comprises high-strength, corrosion-resistant neodymium magnets (e.g., N52 grade, nickel-plated) embedded within precision-machined composite receptacles on both the frame and the attachment. Latching engagement is achieved through automatic magnetic alignment upon proximity. Disengagement requires a deliberate, simultaneous depression of two spatially separated, haptic-feedback enabled, spring-loaded buttons (e.g., made of high-impact polycarbonate), which temporarily disengages a mechanical detent alongside overcoming the magnetic force, preventing accidental release. The seat attachment points on the adapter utilize standardized composite bayonet fittings with integral, self-lubricating, wear-resistant polymer sleeves (e.g., ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene, UHMW-PE) for durable and smooth seat coupling.

classDiagram
    class StrollerSystem {
        +Frame frame
        +MainSeatSupport mainSeatSupport
        +FrontSeatAttachment frontSeatAttachment
    }
    class Frame {
        -CFRP_Tubing[] tubing
        -MagneticReceptacle[] receptacles
        -FrontWheelSupport frontWheelSupport
        -RearWheelSupport rearWheelSupport
        -FoldingMechanism foldingMechanism
        -Handle handle
    }
    class MainSeatSupport {
        +attachTo(Frame)
    }
    class FrontSeatAttachment {
        -CFRP_Tubing[] tubing
        -MagneticLatch magneticLatch
        -HapticButton[] releaseButtons
        -BayonetFitting[] seatMounts
        +attachTo(FrontWheelSupport)
        +support(FrontStrollerSeat)
    }
    class MagneticLatch {
        -NeodymiumMagnets magnets
        -MechanicalDetent detent
        +engage()
        +disengage()
    }
    class FrontWheelSupport {
        -MagneticReceptacle receptacles
    }
    StrollerSystem "1" -- "1" Frame : comprises
    Frame "1" -- "1" MainSeatSupport : supports
    Frame "1" -- "1" FrontWheelSupport : includes
    FrontSeatAttachment "1" -- "1" MagneticLatch : uses
    FrontSeatAttachment "1" -- "*" BayonetFitting : includes
    FrontSeatAttachment "1" --> "1" FrontWheelSupport : attaches to

2. All-Terrain High-Capacity Modular Stroller System with Dynamic Load Balancing

Enabling Description:
A stroller system adapted for demanding off-road environments, where the main frame's front wheel support portion and the removable front seat attachment are constructed from aerospace-grade aluminum alloy (e.g., 7075-T6, heat-treated for optimal strength-to-weight ratio). All wheels feature independent, actively controlled, variable-stiffness suspension systems utilizing electro-rheological fluid dampers (ER dampers) within each shock absorber. The ER fluid's viscosity, and thus the damping coefficient, is modulated by an applied electric field, controlled by an onboard microcontroller (e.g., ARM Cortex-M4 based MCU). Load cells (e.g., strain gauge type, accurate to ±0.1% FS) are integrated into each seat attachment point and the main seat support, providing real-time data on individual child weights and overall weight distribution. An algorithmic control unit within the MCU dynamically adjusts the ER dampers to maintain optimal stability, absorb shocks, and ensure consistent ride comfort across diverse terrains (e.g., gravel, sand, snow, cobblestones) and for varying child configurations (up to 50kg per seat, total system capacity 100kg), preventing tilting and excessive jolting. The front seat attachment is designed to accommodate specialized heavy-duty infant carriers or gear modules.

stateDiagram
    [*] --> Idle
    Idle --> Monitoring: System On
    Monitoring --> AnalyzeLoad: Continuous sensor data
    AnalyzeLoad --> AdjustDamping: Load imbalance detected / Terrain change
    AdjustDamping --> Monitoring: Suspension adjusted
    AnalyzeLoad --> AlertUser: Critical instability / Overload
    AlertUser --> Monitoring: User acknowledged
    Monitoring --> Idle: System Off
    Monitoring : Entry/ Do Read_Load_Cells()
    Monitoring : Entry/ Do Read_Inclinometer()
    AdjustDamping : Entry/ Call_ER_Damper_Control_Algorithm()

3. Autonomous Medical Transport Pod System with Standardized Module Interface

Enabling Description:
A mobile transport system for medical facilities, repurposing the core frame and removable attachment concept. The main frame functions as a mobile robotic platform, constructed from medical-grade stainless steel (e.g., 316L) or autoclavable high-performance polymers (e.g., PEEK). The "front seat attachment" is conceptualized as a removable medical device module attachment, designed to interface with the main platform via a robust, keyed mechanical coupling system and standardized electrical/data connectors (e.g., medical-grade USB-C Power Delivery with galvanic isolation, compliant with IEC 60601-1 for medical electrical equipment). This attachment provides secure mounting rails (e.g., compliant with DIN EN 12284 for medical equipment rails) and power/data passthrough for various medical equipment modules (e.g., portable infusion pumps, multi-parameter vital sign monitors, portable ventilators, specimen transport containers). The system incorporates a central autonomous navigation unit using simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) with LiDAR (e.g., RPLIDAR A2M8) and ultrasonic sensors (e.g., HC-SR04) for obstacle avoidance and efficient routing within a hospital. Medical staff can dispatch pods to specific patient rooms or labs via a centralized management interface or direct voice commands, significantly enhancing logistical efficiency and patient care delivery.

flowchart TD
    A[Start Transport Request] --> B{Destination Set?}
    B -- Yes --> C[Autonomous Navigation System]
    B -- No --> D[Manual Override / Error]
    C --> E{LiDAR / Ultrasonic Data}
    E --> F[SLAM Algorithm]
    F --> G[Path Planning & Obstacle Avoidance]
    G --> H[Propulsion & Steering Control]
    H --> I[Move to Destination]
    I --> J{At Destination?}
    J -- No --> G
    J -- Yes --> K[Module Attachment Interface]
    K --> L[Secure / Release Medical Module]
    L --> M[Transport Complete]
    M --> N[Report Status]
    N --> A
    E --> K

4. Smart Stroller with IoT-Integrated Safety and Environmental Monitoring

Enabling Description:
A stroller system featuring a removable front seat attachment (or adapter) with an integrated Internet of Things (IoT) sensor suite. This suite includes a non-contact infrared temperature sensor (e.g., MLX90614, with ±0.2°C accuracy) to monitor the child's body and ambient temperature, a three-axis accelerometer (e.g., ADXL345, with programmable g-range and output data rates) for detecting impacts, unusual movements, or falls, and a UV index sensor (e.g., Si1145) for monitoring sun exposure. A compact, low-power microcontroller (e.g., Espressif ESP32) processes these sensor data streams, aggregates them, and transmits them wirelessly via Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE 5.0) to a dedicated parent's smartphone application or to a central AI unit integrated into the main stroller frame. The AI unit employs machine learning algorithms for predictive alerts (e.g., heatstroke risk based on temperature and UV, colic detection from movement patterns) and verifies the secure attachment of the second seat using integrated Hall-effect sensors (e.g., A1324) at key connection points. It provides haptic feedback (e.g., via a small vibration motor in the handle) or visual warnings on an integrated display if dislodgement is detected or safety parameters are exceeded (e.g., excessive tilt angle from an inclinometer, child unbuckled).

sequenceDiagram
    ParentApp->>StrollerMCU: Request Stroller Data
    StrollerMCU->>FrontSeatAdapter: Request Sensor Data
    FrontSeatAdapter->>TempSensor: Read Temperature
    FrontSeatAdapter->>AccelSensor: Read Acceleration
    FrontSeatAdapter->>UVSensor: Read UV Index
    TempSensor-->>FrontSeatAdapter: Temperature Value
    AccelSensor-->>FrontSeatAdapter: Acceleration Data
    UVSensor-->>FrontSeatAdapter: UV Value
    FrontSeatAdapter->>FrontSeatAdapter: Process & Aggregate Data
    FrontSeatAdapter->>StrollerMCU: Transmit Aggregated Data (BLE)
    StrollerMCU->>StrollerMCU: AI Analysis & Anomaly Detection
    StrollerMCU-->>ParentApp: Transmit Stroller Status & Alerts (BLE)
    StrollerMCU->>ParentApp: If (Dislodged OR SafetyBreach) Trigger_Alert()
    StrollerMCU->>ParentApp: If (Dislodged) Haptic_Feedback()

5. Fail-Safe Modular Stroller with Progressive Collapse Mechanism and Emergency Braking

Enabling Description:
A stroller system with a removable front seat attachment engineered with intrinsic fail-safe characteristics. The attachment mechanism features sacrificial shear pins, precisely fabricated from a polymer composite (e.g., glass-filled nylon) calibrated to fracture under predefined excessive load conditions (e.g., impact forces exceeding 500N or static overload exceeding 60kg). These pins are designed to fail before critical structural members of the main frame or child seat are compromised. In the event of shear pin failure, the front seat attachment remains securely tethered to the main frame via a redundant, high-strength synthetic fiber cord (e.g., Dyneema® SK78, with a tensile strength of 5kN), preventing complete detachment. This controlled failure initiates a progressive collapse sequence, lowering the attachment into a less stable but still contained position close to the ground, minimizing injury risk. Concurrently, an integrated emergency braking system, comprising spring-actuated caliper brakes on the front wheels, automatically engages upon detection of structural failure (via strain gauges near shear pins) or an excessive tilt angle (via a high-precision inclinometer, e.g., SCA610-CA14H-1) that exceeds a pre-set threshold (e.g., 25 degrees). A visual and auditory alarm (e.g., 90dB piezo buzzer and flashing LED) activates to alert the user.

stateDiagram
    [*] --> Operational
    Operational --> NormalUse: Stroller in use
    NormalUse --> DetectOverload: Load > Threshold OR Impact
    DetectOverload --> ShearPinFail: Shear Pin Fractures
    ShearPinFail --> TetheredCollapse: Attachment Lowers & Tethers
    TetheredCollapse --> EmergencyBrakeEngaged: Brakes engage, Alarms activate
    EmergencyBrakeEngaged --> StabilizedFailure: System stable, limited function
    StabilizedFailure --> UserIntervention: User rectifies / disassembles
    NormalUse --> DetectTilt: Tilt Angle > Threshold
    DetectTilt --> EmergencyBrakeEngaged: Brakes engage, Alarms activate
    EmergencyBrakeEngaged --> StabilizedFailure
    NormalUse --> [*] : System Off

6. Biometric-Secured Multi-Child Transport System

Enabling Description:
A stroller system that integrates advanced biometric security into its modular design, specifically for the removable front seat attachment. The mechanical coupling between the front seat attachment and the stroller's front wheel support includes a smart electromechanical locking mechanism (e.g., a solenoid-actuated bolt). This lock is controlled by an embedded microcontroller which only allows secure coupling or decoupling upon successful biometric authentication. Authentication is achieved via a multi-modal biometric system: either a high-resolution optical fingerprint sensor (e.g., FPC1020, with 508 DPI resolution) integrated into the stroller's handle or a compact facial recognition camera module (e.g., OV7670, paired with an embedded vision processor) positioned near the handle. Only pre-registered users (e.g., parents, guardians) can activate the attachment or detachment sequence. Additionally, each child seat and the removable attachment are equipped with passive RFID tags (e.g., UHF EPC Gen2 compliant). An RFID reader integrated into the stroller's frame continuously scans these tags to verify correct seat placement, attachment integrity, and to confirm the presence of an authorized child (if children wear corresponding RFID wristbands). The system emits an audible warning and prevents movement if an unrecognized child is detected, if a seat is improperly secured, or if an attempt to remove a seat without authorization is made.

sequenceDiagram
    User->>StrollerFrame: Initiate Attach/Detach
    StrollerFrame->>BiometricSensor: Request Biometric Scan
    BiometricSensor-->>StrollerFrame: Biometric Data
    StrollerFrame->>AuthenticationModule: Authenticate User
    AuthenticationModule-->>StrollerFrame: Authentication Result
    alt If Authentication Success
        StrollerFrame->>ElectromechanicalLock: Unlock Attachment
        User->>FrontSeatAttachment: Couple/Decouple Attachment
        FrontSeatAttachment->>RFIDReader: Scan RFID Tags
        RFIDReader-->>StrollerFrame: RFID Data (Seat, Child ID)
        StrollerFrame->>StrollerFrame: Verify Attachment & Child Presence
        alt If Verification Success
            StrollerFrame->>ElectromechanicalLock: Lock Attachment
            StrollerFrame-->>User: Operation Successful
        else If Verification Fail
            StrollerFrame-->>User: Audio/Visual Warning (Invalid Seat/Child)
            StrollerFrame->>ElectromechanicalLock: Re-Lock Attachment
        end
    else If Authentication Fail
        StrollerFrame-->>User: Audio/Visual Warning (Access Denied)
    end

Combination Prior Art Scenarios with Open-Source Standards

The following scenarios combine elements of US11505231 with existing open-source standards, demonstrating how such integrations would be obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art.

1. Integration with Robot Operating System (ROS) for Autonomous Features

Combination Description:
A stroller system incorporating the removable front seat attachment (as described in US11505231) where the underlying frame architecture and attachment points are designed to be compatible with the Robot Operating System (ROS) framework. This would involve the stroller's main control unit publishing sensor data (e.g., wheel encoders for odometry, IMU data for orientation, load cell data for weight distribution) as standard ROS topics. The removable front seat attachment itself could act as a modular ROS node, publishing its own status (e.g., seat occupancy, attachment lock status, environmental sensors if equipped) and subscribing to commands from the main stroller's ROS master. This enables the development of open-source ROS packages for advanced functionalities such as autonomous following of a caregiver (using visual markers or UWB localization), intelligent braking assistance based on terrain and load, or even basic remote-control operation. The mechanical interface for the attachment would include standard power and data lines (e.g., 24V power, CAN bus or Ethernet) accessible via a common ROS-compliant connector.

2. Open Hardware Modular Interface using Open Source Hardware Association (OSHWA) Guidelines

Combination Description:
A stroller system featuring a removable front seat attachment (as described in US11505231) where the physical and electrical interface between the main stroller frame and the attachment adheres to the Open Source Hardware Association (OSHWA) certification guidelines. This implies that the mechanical dimensions of the coupling elements, the fastening points, and the electrical pinouts for power and data transfer (e.g., specifying voltage, current limits, and data protocols like I2C or SPI) are openly published and documented under an open-source license (e.g., CERN OHL). Such a standardized, openly documented "stroller accessory bus" or "modular attachment port" would enable third-party manufacturers and hobbyists to design and produce a wide array of interoperable front seat attachments. These could range from specialized child seats (e.g., adaptive seating for children with special needs), cargo baskets, pet carriers, or even integrated power packs, all guaranteed to be physically and electrically compatible with the core stroller frame, fostering an open ecosystem of modular accessories.

3. Secure Communication for IoT Features using Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) Generic Access Profile (GAP) and Generic Attribute Profile (GATT)

Combination Description:
A stroller system with an IoT-integrated removable front seat attachment (as described in Derivative 4) that exclusively utilizes Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) for wireless communication, adhering to the BLE Core Specification. The removable front seat attachment functions as a BLE peripheral device, implementing the Generic Access Profile (GAP) to advertise its presence and connection capabilities. It further implements the Generic Attribute Profile (GATT) as a GATT Server, exposing custom services and characteristics. For instance, a "Child Monitoring Service" (UUID: 0x2A6F) could expose characteristics such as "Temperature" (UUID: 0x2A6E, indicating child/ambient temperature), "Activity Level" (UUID: 0x2A6D, derived from accelerometer data), and "UV Exposure" (UUID: 0x2AB6). An "Attachment Status Service" could expose "Lock Status" and "Presence Detection" characteristics. A mobile application on the parent's smartphone acts as a GATT client, discovering these services and securely subscribing to their characteristics using standard BLE pairing and encryption methods (e.g., LE Secure Connections). The formal specifications for these custom BLE services and characteristics are openly published, ensuring interoperability with any BLE-compliant device capable of acting as a GATT client.

Generated 5/17/2026, 12:47:58 AM

Keep exploring

More patents asserted by Unified Patents

This patent in court (2)

2 tracked lawsuits name US 11505231.