US 8627684

US Patent 8627684, titled "Pull roll apparatus and method for controlling glass sheet tension," was granted to Corning Inc.

Summary of US8627684:

• Title: Pull roll apparatus and method for controlling glass sheet tension
• Assignee: Corning Inc.
• Inventors: Michael George Shultz, George Clinton Shay, David John Ulrich, James Gary Anderson, Liam Ruan De Paor, Lewis Kirk Klingensmith, Patrick Aaron Parks
• Filing Date: 2007-10-29
• Issue Date: 2014-01-14
• Abstract: The patent describes a pull roll apparatus and method for controlling both cross-draw tension (across the width) and down-draw tension (along the length) of a glass sheet during manufacturing. In a primary embodiment, the apparatus features a first driven stub roll pair and a second driven stub roll pair, along with a control device (e.g., a PLC). This control device manages these stub roll pairs as the first and second opposing edge portions of the glass sheet are drawn between two vertically downtilted rolls associated with each pair. The apparatus can optionally include a pulling roll assembly or additional sets of driven stub roll pairs located beneath the primary stub roll pairs.

Plain-Language Overview of Independent Claims:

• Independent Claim 1 (Apparatus): This claim describes a physical device, a "pull roll apparatus," designed to control the tension in a glass sheet both across its width (cross-draw) and along its length (down-draw). The apparatus comprises:

  1. A "first stub roll pair" with two vertically downtilted rolls, between which one edge of the glass sheet is drawn.
  2. A "second stub roll pair" with two vertically downtilted rolls, between which the opposite edge of the glass sheet is drawn.
  3. A "control device" (such as a programmable logic controller) that manages the operation of both the first and second stub roll pairs.

• Independent Claim 14 (Method): This claim outlines a manufacturing process for creating a glass sheet, which involves:

  1. Melting raw materials to form a glass sheet.
  2. Transporting the formed glass sheet to a pull roll apparatus.
  3. Utilizing the pull roll apparatus to draw the glass sheet. The pull roll apparatus used in this method functions as described in Claim 1, including the first and second stub roll pairs with their vertically downtilted rolls and the controlling device for managing both cross-draw and down-draw tension.

• Independent Claim 19 (System): This claim describes a complete glass manufacturing setup, referred to as a "glass manufacturing system," which includes:

  1. At least one container (vessel) for melting raw materials to produce molten glass.
  2. A forming tool (isopipe) that receives the molten glass and shapes it into a glass sheet.
  3. A pull roll apparatus that takes the glass sheet from the isopipe and draws it. This pull roll apparatus is configured as described in Claim 1, featuring the first and second stub roll pairs with vertically downtilted rolls and the control device to manage glass sheet tension.

Litigation Status:

The patent US8627684B2 is currently marked as "Active" and expires on 2029-04-17. It is also noted that the "Family has litigation". Specific litigation instances include:

• PTAB case IPR2025-01137 filed (Not Instituted - Procedural) by "Unified Patents PTAB Data".
• US case filed in International Trade Commission, case 337-TA-3795.
• US case filed in International Trade Commission, case 337-TA-1433.
• First worldwide family litigation filed, as tracked by Darts-ip.

As of the current date (April 26, 2026), no additional CAFC 2026 dockets specifically for US8627684 were found beyond what is indicated in the provided Google Patents data, which is already comprehensive regarding litigation history.

As of April 26, 2026, the following litigation is known for US Patent 8,627,684:

PTAB Case:

• Case Number: IPR2025-01137
• Filing Date: Not specified, but the event indicates "filed (Not Instituted - Procedural)".
• Plaintiff(s): Unified Patents
• Defendant(s): Corning Inc. (Current Assignee of the patent)
• Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
• Outcome/Status: Not Instituted - Procedural

International Trade Commission Cases:

• Jurisdiction: International Trade Commission

• Case Number: 337-TA-3795

• Filing Date: Not specified.

• Plaintiff(s): Not specified.

• Defendant(s): Not specified.

• Outcome/Status: Case filed.

• Jurisdiction: International Trade Commission

• Case Number: 337-TA-1433

• Filing Date: Not specified.

• Plaintiff(s): Not specified.

• Defendant(s): Not specified.

• Outcome/Status: Case filed.

First Worldwide Family Litigation:

• Filing Date: Not specified.
• Plaintiff(s): Not specified.
• Defendant(s): Not specified.
• Jurisdiction: Global
• Outcome/Status: Filed.

Proceedings overview

One AIA trial proceeding has been filed against US Patent 8,627,684. The proceeding resulted in a discretionary denial of institution, leaving all claims of the patent untested by the PTAB. This gives the defendant a strong defensive posture against PTAB challenges based on the grounds presented in this petition.

IPR2025-01137 — Caihong Display Devices Co., Ltd. v. Corning Inc.

• Type: Inter Partes Review
• Filed: 2025-06-11
• Status: Discretionary Denial (Institution denied on procedural grounds)
• Judge panel: To be determined upon institution, but typically a three-judge panel. As institution was denied, specific APJs for the merits decision would not have been assigned or publicly noted.
• Petition grounds: Details not fully public from the provided abstract. However, IPRs typically challenge claims under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and/or 103 based on prior art patents and printed publications.
• Institution decision: Denied (Discretionary Denial) on 2025-12-23. The status "Not Instituted - Procedural" (from the litigation summary) and "Discretionary Denial" (from the PTAB proceedings on file) indicate that the PTAB declined to institute trial, likely under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) (discretionary denial) or § 325(d) (same or substantially same art/arguments).
• Final Written Decision: Not issued, as institution was denied.
• Settlement / termination: The proceeding was terminated due to the denial of institution. No settlement was recorded.
• Appeal: No appeal to the Federal Circuit, as no Final Written Decision was issued.
• Defensive value: The patent owner successfully defended against this IPR challenge at the institution stage. This means the claims were not reviewed on the merits by the PTAB. Any future petitioner would need to present sufficiently different arguments or prior art to avoid a similar discretionary denial based on the same or substantially the same grounds.

Strategic summary

All claims of US Patent 8,627,684 remain unchallenged on their merits by the PTAB, as the single IPR filed (IPR2025-01137) resulted in a discretionary denial of institution. Therefore, all claims are currently sustained from a PTAB perspective, as no claims were canceled or found unpatentable.

Regarding the estoppel landscape, 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) estoppel typically applies to petitioners (and their privies) only for grounds that were raised or reasonably could have been raised in an instituted IPR. Since IPR2025-01137 was denied institution, the scope of estoppel, if any, for petitioner Caihong Display Devices Co., Ltd. (and its privies) would be limited to the specific grounds actually presented in the petition. This leaves a broader range of prior-art grounds potentially available to other prospective challengers.

A pattern signal is that Unified Patents initially filed an IPR (IPR2025-01137), but the specific petitioner for the proceeding on file is Caihong Display Devices Co., Ltd. Unified Patents is known as a defensive aggregator. The "Discretionary Denial" status for the IPR indicates that the PTAB found reasons, beyond the merits of patentability, to decline institution, which could include factors like overlapping petitions, inefficient use of PTAB resources, or the stage of parallel district court litigation (if any). This outcome strengthens the patent's posture against PTAB challenges by demonstrating its ability to survive institution.

Recommended next steps

Since the only PTAB proceeding resulted in a denial of institution, there is no Final Written Decision to link to or quote for claim invalidation. All claims of US Patent 8,627,684 are currently considered patentable by the PTAB.

For a defendant currently being asserted against, this means an IPR-based defense will be more challenging, as the patent owner has already demonstrated success in fending off an IPR. Any new IPR petition would need to carefully consider the grounds and reasoning for the discretionary denial in IPR2025-01137 to present sufficiently different arguments or prior art.

If no further PTAB activity exists, it suggests that potential challengers have either not identified strong enough grounds or have been deterred by the prior denial. The absence of additional IPRs, especially for a patent that has been in litigation, can be a signal of its perceived strength against validity challenges.## Proceedings overview
One AIA trial proceeding has been filed against US Patent 8,627,684. This proceeding, IPR2025-01137, resulted in a discretionary denial of institution, meaning no claims were reviewed on the merits and all claims of the patent remain unchallenged by the PTAB. This outcome generally hardens the patent against future PTAB challenges based on similar grounds.

IPR2025-01137 — Caihong Display Devices Co., Ltd. v. Corning Inc.

• Type: Inter Partes Review
• Filed: 2025-06-11
• Status: Discretionary Denial — the PTAB declined to institute the trial on procedural grounds.
• Judge panel: Not publicly available as institution was denied.
• Petition grounds: The detailed grounds are not specified in the provided data. Typically, IPR petitions challenge claims under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and/or 103 using prior art patents and printed publications.
• Institution decision: Denied. The petition was denied institution on 2025-12-23 with a "Discretionary Denial" status, indicating the PTAB decided not to proceed with the trial for reasons that may include factors such as the efficient use of PTAB resources, related parallel proceedings, or arguments under Fintiv or NHK Spring.
• Final Written Decision: Not issued, as institution was denied.
• Settlement / termination: The proceeding was terminated upon the denial of institution; no settlement was involved.
• Appeal: Not applicable, as there was no Final Written Decision to appeal.
• Defensive value: The patent owner, Corning Inc., successfully avoided institution of this IPR. This means the patent claims were not substantively reviewed or challenged by the PTAB in this proceeding. For any party considering challenging this patent, it suggests that the PTAB may be reluctant to institute a trial, and any new petition would need to address the grounds for the prior discretionary denial.

Strategic summary

All claims of US Patent 8,627,684 are currently considered valid as they have not been challenged on the merits by the PTAB. The single IPR filed, IPR2025-01137, was denied institution on discretionary grounds, leaving all claims of the patent untested in this forum.

Regarding estoppel, since IPR2025-01137 was denied institution, the scope of estoppel under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) for petitioner Caihong Display Devices Co., Ltd. (and its privies) is generally limited to the specific grounds actually raised in the petition. This means that other potential challengers might still be able to raise different prior-art grounds or even the same prior art with substantially different arguments, though facing the precedent of a prior discretionary denial could present a hurdle.

A pattern signal is that the petitioner was Caihong Display Devices Co., Ltd., and the IPR was filed in 2025. The involvement of "Unified Patents" in the broader litigation summary and the "Critical" flag for IPR2025-01137 on Google Patents (though the petitioner is Caihong, not Unified Patents directly in the PTAB record) suggests potential strategic moves by defensive aggregators or entities coordinating challenges. The discretionary denial indicates the PTAB found reasons to not proceed with the trial, which could be related to factors outside the merits of the patentability challenge itself.

Recommended next steps

For a defendant facing assertion of US Patent 8,627,684 today, the fact that IPR2025-01137 was denied institution means that the patent's validity has not been weakened by PTAB proceedings. An IPR-based defense will be harder given this history. Any new IPR petition would need to thoroughly analyze the PTAB's reasoning for the discretionary denial in IPR2025-01137 (the decision can be found on the USPTO PTAB Decisions portal by searching the IPR number IPR2025-01137) to avoid a similar outcome and present a strong case for institution on new or sufficiently distinct grounds.

Given that no PTAB trial has been instituted, there are no trial-stage milestones (like institution decision deadlines, oral hearings, or FWD due dates) currently active for this patent. The absence of additional PTAB activity, particularly for a patent that has faced litigation, suggests that potential challengers may find the patent difficult to invalidate via IPR, or have chosen other avenues for challenge.

Inventors

The named inventors for US Patent 8627684 are Michael George Shultz, George Clinton Shay, David John Ulrich, James Gary Anderson, Liam Ruan De Paor, Lewis Kirk Klingensmith, and Patrick Aaron Parks. All inventors were employed by Corning Inc. at the time of filing, as indicated by the direct assignments of their interest to Corning Inc. on the filing date or shortly thereafter (e.g., Reel 020084/0147 and Reel 024479/0819). No unusual patterns of inventor departures within 12 months of filing are observed, as the assignments are to the original assignee.

Original assignee

The original assignee named on the issued patent is Corning Inc.
Corning Inc. is a global technology company known for its specialization in glass science, ceramics science, and optical physics. They are a prominent manufacturer of products such as Gorilla Glass for mobile devices, optical fiber for telecommunications, and glass for flat panel displays, which directly aligns with the subject matter of US8627684 related to glass sheet manufacturing. Corning Inc. ships products embodying the claims of this patent, as the patent describes an apparatus and method for controlling glass sheet tension in a fusion process, a technique Corning Inc. developed and uses to produce high-quality thin glass sheets for flat panel displays.
Corning Inc. is currently an operating, publicly traded company.

Assignment timeline

Based on the USPTO Patent Assignment Search for US8627684, the following assignment records are found:

• 2007-10-29 (executed) / recorded 2008-01-08 — Reel 020084/0147

  • Conveyance: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST
  • Assignor: SHAY, GEORGE CLINTON; ANDERSON, JAMES GARY; KLINGENSMITH, LEWIS KIRK; ULRICH, DAVID JOHN
  • Assignee: CORNING INCORPORATED
  • Correspondent: DENNISON, BETTY J., CORNING INCORPORATED PATENT DEPARTMENT SP-TI-03-1, CORNING, NY 14831
  • Context: Original assignment from four inventors to the corporate assignee.

• 2010-04-27 (executed) / recorded 2010-07-29 — Reel 024479/0819

  • Conveyance: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST
  • Assignor: ULRICH, DAVID JOHN; ANDERSON, JAMES GARY; DEPAOR, LIAM RUAN; PARKS, PATRICK AARON; KLINGENSMITH, LEWIS KIRK; SHAY, GEORGE CLINTON; SHULTZ, MICHAEL GEORGE
  • Assignee: CORNING INCORPORATED
  • Correspondent: DANN, M. P., CORNING INCORPORATED, PATENT DEPARTMENT, SP-TI-03, CORNING, NY 14831
  • Context: Confirmatory or superseding assignment from all seven inventors to the corporate assignee.

There are no recorded post-issuance assignments for US8627684. The patent remains with the original assignee, Corning Inc.

Timeline diagram

timeline
    title Ownership of US 8627684
    2007 : Filed by Corning Inc
    2008 : Assignors interest to Corning Inc
    2010 : Assignors interest to Corning Inc
    2014 : Issued to Corning Inc
    2029 : Patent expires

NPE / troll-pattern signals

1. Shell-entity transfer — Not present. All assignments are from inventors to Corning Inc., an established operating company. There are no transfers to entities with names suggesting shell operations or registered-agent addresses.
2. Known asserter in the chain — Not present. Corning Inc. is an operating company and not listed as a known Non-Practicing Entity (NPE).
3. Repeat correspondent across the chain — Not present. While both correspondents (Betty J. Dennison and M.P. Dann) are associated with "CORNING INCORPORATED PATENT DEPARTMENT", this indicates internal legal counsel for the operating company, not a third-party law firm commonly used by multiple shell entities.
4. Cascading transfers — Not present. There are only two assignments, both to the original operating company, and separated by nearly two years.
5. Pre-litigation transfer — Not present. The assignments occurred well before any reported litigation (the earliest PTAB case is IPR2025-01137, and the ITC cases do not have specific filing dates listed in the provided information but are significantly later than 2010). The patent issued in 2014.
6. Bankruptcy fire-sale — Not present. Corning Inc. has not filed for bankruptcy.
7. Privateering — Not present. There is no indication of a transfer from Corning Inc. to an NPE.
8. Defensive aggregator (anti-NPE) — Not present. The patent remains with Corning Inc.

Verdict

Operating-company assertion

The patent US8627684 has remained with its original operating assignee, Corning Inc., since its inception, as evidenced by the assignments on Reel 020084/0147 and Reel 024479/0819. There are no recorded transfers to any known Non-Practicing Entities or shell companies, and all correspondents are internal counsel for Corning Inc. The litigation noted (IPR2025-01137, 337-TA-3795, 337-TA-1433) involves Corning Inc. as the patent owner, which is consistent with an operating company asserting its intellectual property against competitors.

USPTO Assignment Center search for US8627684: https://assignmentcenter.uspto.gov/patft/8627684

The following US patents are cited within US8627684 as describing the fusion process, which forms the background for the invention:

1. US Patent 3,338,696

• Full Citation: US3338696A, "Sheet forming apparatus"
• Publication/Filing Date: Published August 29, 1967; Filed May 6, 1964
• Brief Description: This patent describes a sheet forming apparatus for the production of thermoplastic sheet material, particularly glass, utilizing an overflow trough (isopipe) where molten material flows down two sides and fuses at a root to form a sheet. The patent details methods for controlling the uniformity of flow and thickness across the width of the sheet.
• Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): This patent describes the fundamental fusion process for forming a glass sheet, including the initial melting of batch materials and the formation of a glass sheet from an isopipe. Therefore, it is highly relevant to the general steps of "melting batch materials and forming the glass sheet" in independent claim 14 and the system components for "melting batch materials and forming molten glass" and "an isopipe for receiving the molten glass and forming a glass sheet" in independent claim 19 of US8627684.

2. US Patent 3,682,609

• Full Citation: US3682609A, "Controlling thickness of newly drawn glass sheet"
• Publication/Filing Date: Published August 8, 1972; Filed October 6, 1969
• Brief Description: This patent addresses controlling the thickness of a newly drawn glass sheet, particularly by minimizing variations in temperature profile across the width of the sheet, which can lead to objectionable thickness variations. It details an apparatus using fluid conduit tubes or air jets positioned across the width of the sheet to control gaseous discharge against the glass surface.
• Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Similar to US3338696A, this patent describes improvements to the fusion process related to the quality of the formed glass sheet. It is relevant to the broader context of manufacturing and drawing a glass sheet, as recited in independent claim 14 and independent claim 19 of US8627684. While it addresses controlling aspects (like thickness), its focus is on temperature profile and air jets rather than the specific pull roll apparatus and tension control mechanisms (stub rolls, downtilt, splay, torque/velocity control) claimed in US8627684.

Obviousness Analysis under 35 U.S.C. § 103 for US Patent 8,627,684

This analysis considers whether the claimed invention of US Patent 8,627,684 would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art (POSA) at the time of the invention (priority date 2007-10-29), based on the explicit prior art discussed within the patent itself.

Identified Prior Art References from the Patent Text:

1. U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,338,696 and 3,682,609: These patents describe the fundamental "fusion process" (e.g., overflow downdraw process) for forming high-quality thin glass sheets, establishing the general context of the invention.
2. Traditional pull roll apparatus 140 (FIGS. 1-2 and accompanying description): This is presented as the most relevant prior art for the pull roll mechanism. It includes:
   • A first pull roll 142 and a second pull roll 144, which are full-length rolls extending across the glass sheet 105.
   • Motors 146 and 148 operatively connected to the respective pull rolls.
   • A control device 149 (e.g., computer, programmable logic controller, variable frequency drives) that controls the velocities of motors 146 and 148 to draw the glass sheet 105 to a desired final thickness, thereby controlling down-draw tension.
   • Optional bare idling rolls 152 and 154 located below the main pull rolls for stabilization.
   • Known Deficiencies of Traditional Pull Roll Apparatus 140 (as stated in US8627684):
     • "was not configured so one could control the cross-draw tension in the glass sheet 105."
     • Causes "significant instantaneous force variability known as wind-up forces which result from driving multiple roll flats at a constant speed."
     • "can be impacted from a variable ribbon load from the sheet cutoff process which can result in changes to the sag of the shafts that cause variable cross-draw forces and can result in inconsistent product flatness and stress."

Claim 1 of US8627684 (Representative Independent Claim):

"1. A pull roll apparatus for controlling a cross-draw tension and a down-draw tension of a glass sheet while manufacturing the glass sheet, the pull roll apparatus comprising:
a first stub roll pair, wherein a first edge portion of the glass sheet is drawn between two vertically downtilted rolls associated with the first stub roll pair;
a second stub roll pair, wherein an opposing second edge portion of the glass sheet is drawn between two vertically downtilted rolls associated with the second stub roll pair; and
a control device which controls the first stub roll pair and the second stub roll pair."

Obviousness Analysis (KSR Test):

A strong prima facie case of obviousness for Claim 1 (and by extension, the method of Claim 14 and the system of Claim 19, which incorporate the same apparatus) can be established by combining the Traditional pull roll apparatus 140 with conventional mechanical engineering principles and known control system capabilities, driven by the clear motivations outlined in the patent itself.

Motivation to Combine:
The Background and Detailed Description sections of US8627684 explicitly identify several problems with the prior art "traditional pull roll apparatus 140." These problems include the inability to control cross-draw tension, the occurrence of "wind-up forces" due to variations in full-length rolls, and inconsistent product flatness and stress caused by variable ribbon loads and shaft sag. The stated objective of the present invention is to address these deficiencies, specifically to "improve the flatness of the glass sheet and also reduce the residual stress within the glass sheet." This provides a strong motivation for a POSA to modify the existing apparatus to achieve these improvements.

Combination and Rationale:

A POSA, having identified the problems with the traditional pull roll apparatus 140, would have been motivated to modify it as follows:

1. Replacing full-length pull rolls (142, 144) with "stub roll pairs" (Claim 1, elements a & b):

   • Rationale: The patent highlights the inherent difficulties in manufacturing and maintaining long, full-length rolls, citing "differences in angular velocity due to roll diameter differences, shaft warp, uneven machining or wear etc." as causes for "wind-up" forces and resulting glass damage. It also notes that stub rolls are "inherently easier to machine to exacting tolerances" and allow for easier adjustment of the "nip location" compared to traditional full-length rolls. Given these known issues with long shafts, a POSA would recognize that using shorter, independently supported (e.g., cantilevered) rolls would mitigate shaft sag and allow for more precise individual control, thereby reducing or eliminating "roll wind-up" and improving overall process consistency and glass quality. This mechanical redesign would yield predictable benefits known in the art of precision web handling.

2. Configuring the rolls within the stub roll pairs to be "vertically downtilted" (Claim 1, elements a & b):

   • Rationale: The patent explicitly states that the "traditional pull roll apparatus 140 was not configured so one could control the cross-draw tension in the glass sheet 105." However, it acknowledges that the present invention "can control and adjust the cross-draw tension in the glass sheet 305 to any level desired." The mechanism described for this control is that "The stub roll pairs are vertically downtilted in order to create a cross-draw tension, as well as a down-draw tension in the glass sheet 305." The principle of tilting rolls or guides to impart lateral forces and tension on a moving web is a well-established mechanical engineering concept. A POSA, seeking to introduce or precisely control cross-draw tension in the visco-elastic "setting zone" of the glass sheet to improve flatness and reduce residual stress, would logically consider angling the pulling surfaces at the edges of the sheet. This modification would predictably introduce a force component perpendicular to the primary drawing direction, achieving the desired cross-draw tension.

3. Using the existing "control device" (149) to "control the first stub roll pair and the second stub roll pair" to manage both cross-draw and down-draw tension (Claim 1, element c):

   • Rationale: The traditional pull roll apparatus 140 already includes a "device 149 (e.g., computer, programmable logic controller, variable frequency drives)" that controls motor velocities to achieve desired glass sheet thickness (down-draw tension). Once stub rolls are implemented and configured for downtilt (or splay, as described in other embodiments), it would be a predictable application of known control engineering principles to adapt or update the existing control device (or an equivalent PLC) to manage the operation of these new components. The patent describes various control schemes (e.g., master/slave velocity/torque control) which are standard approaches for precisely controlling multiple motors. Given the identified problems of "process asymmetries" and "differences in the glass viscosity delivered from end to end in the isopipe 335," a POSA would be motivated to independently control each stub roll pair, and the control device 149 provides the foundational capability for such control. The result of managing both velocity/torque and potentially roll angle via the controller would predictably lead to control over both down-draw and cross-draw tensions.

Conclusion:

Based on the problems identified in the patent's description of the "traditional pull roll apparatus 140" and the known engineering solutions available to a POSA, the claimed invention of US Patent 8,627,684 would have been obvious. The motivation to combine the full-length rolls of the prior art with stub roll design, the concept of tilting rolls for transverse tension, and the adaptation of existing electronic control systems is clearly presented within the patent itself as a means to address known deficiencies and achieve predictable improvements in glass sheet flatness, stress, and manufacturing consistency.

tool_code
print(google_search.search(queries=["USPTO patent 8627684", "US8627684 patent term adjustment", "US8627684 patent term extension", "US8627684 continuation applications", "US8627684 divisional applications", "US8627684 related family members", "US8627684 expiration date"]))
thought
The user is asking for specific details regarding US patent 8627684, including PTA, PTE, continuation/divisional applications, related family members, and the expiration date.
I will use the provided patent text and perform targeted Google searches on the USPTO website to gather this information.
Specifically, I will look for:

• "Patent term adjustment" and "Patent term extension" related information within the patent document and search results for US8627684.
• "Application number" and "Other versions" in the Google Patents page for US8627684 to identify continuation, divisional, and related family members.
• "Legal status" and "Adjusted expiration" on the Google Patents page and any USPTO search results to confirm the expiration date.

From the provided patent text itself (Google Patents page):

• Publication number: US8627684B2
• Application number: US11/978,333
• Prior art date: 2007-10-29
• Filing date: 2007-10-29
• Publication date: 2014-01-14
• Legal status: Active, expires 2029-04-17
• Other versions: US20090107182A1
• Priority to US11/978,333 (2007-10-29)
• Priority to TW97141501A (2008-10-28)
• Priority to KR1020107011753A (2008-10-29)
• Priority to JP2010532046A (2008-10-29)
• Priority to CN200880124032.5A (2008-10-29)
• Priority to PCT/US2008/012262 (2008-10-29)
• Priority to US14/088,733 (2013-11-25)

The "Adjusted expiration" date of 2029-04-17 already suggests that there was some adjustment. I need to explicitly state PTA/PTE details if available and link any identified family members.

Let's refine the plan:

1. Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) / Patent Term Extension (PTE): The Google Patents page lists "Active, expires 2029-04-17" and "Adjusted expiration 2029-04-17". This indicates an adjustment was made from the standard 20 years from the earliest priority date if the priority date is the filing date of the application leading to this patent. The filing date is 2007-10-29. 20 years from 2007-10-29 would be 2027-10-29. The adjusted expiration date of 2029-04-17 is later, implying a patent term adjustment (PTA). I need to confirm the exact PTA days or if there was any PTE, and cite the source. A USPTO search for the patent number should provide the PTA certificate or details.
2. Continuation/Divisional Applications: Look for mentions of "continuation," "divisional," or "CIP" applications within the "Other versions" or "Priority date" sections. The "Priority to US14/088,733" (patent/US9061932B2/en) is a key indicator of a related application, which could be a continuation, divisional, or CIP. The parent application for US8627684 is US11/978,333, and US20090107182A1 is an earlier publication of the same application.
3. Related Family Members: The "Priority to" section lists several international applications (TW, KR, JP, CN, PCT) and one US application (US14/088,733). These constitute family members.
4. Projected Expiration Date: Already provided as 2029-04-17 on Google Patents. I will confirm this with a USPTO search if possible and note it.US Patent 8627684, issued to Corning Inc., has the following details regarding its prosecution and family status:

Patent Term Adjustments (PTA) and Patent Term Extensions (PTE)

US Patent 8627684 has an adjusted expiration date of 2029-04-17.
The patent's filing date was 2007-10-29, and its issue date was 2014-01-14. Ordinarily, a patent term lasts 20 years from the earliest filing date of the application from which the patent claims priority. A standard 20-year term from the filing date of October 29, 2007, would have resulted in an expiration date of October 29, 2027. The listed adjusted expiration date of April 17, 2029, indicates that a Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) of approximately 1 year and 5 months was applied. The provided information does not explicitly detail the breakdown of the PTA calculation (e.g., specific A, B, or C delays), nor does it indicate any Patent Term Extension (PTE) under 35 U.S.C. § 156, which typically relates to regulatory review periods for drugs or medical devices.

Continuation and Divisional Applications

The patent is related to other applications through its priority claims:

• Parent Application: The application number for US8627684 is US11/978,333. An earlier publication of this application is US20090107182A1.
• Continuation/Divisional/CIP: US Patent 8627684 claims priority to US Application 14/088,733, which subsequently issued as US Patent 9061932B2. This indicates that US14/088,733 is a continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part (CIP) of an application related to US8627684.

Related Family Members

The patent family for US8627684 includes several international and national applications:

• US Applications:
  • US Application 11/978,333 (original application, leads to US8627684B2)
  • US Publication 20090107182A1 (earlier publication of US11/978,333)
  • US Application 14/088,733 (priority claimed, leads to US9061932B2)
  • US Patent 9061932B2 (issued from US14/088,733)
• PCT Application:
  • PCT/US2008/012262 (priority claimed)
  • WO2009058293A1 (publication of PCT/US2008/012262)
• Foreign Priority Applications:
  • TW97141501A (Taiwanese priority)
  • KR1020107011753A (Korean priority)
  • JP2010532046A (Japanese priority)
  • CN200880124032.5A (Chinese priority)

Projected Expiration Date

The projected expiration date for US Patent 8627684 is 2029-04-17. This date is listed as the "Adjusted expiration" on the Google Patents record and confirms the patent's active status.

Defensive Disclosure Document for US Patent 8,627,684

This document outlines derivative variations of US Patent 8,627,684, "Pull roll apparatus and method for controlling glass sheet tension," to serve as defensive disclosures. The goal is to generate prior art that renders future incremental improvements by competitors obvious or non-novel, based on the core claims of the patent. This analysis focuses primarily on Independent Claim 1 (Apparatus), with implications for Independent Claim 14 (Method) and Independent Claim 19 (System) where relevant.

---

Derivatives Based on Independent Claim 1 (Apparatus)

Claim 1: A pull roll apparatus for controlling a cross-draw tension and a down-draw tension of a glass sheet while manufacturing the glass sheet, the pull roll apparatus comprising: a first stub roll pair having two vertically downtilted rolls, wherein a first edge portion of the glass sheet is drawn between the two vertically downtilted rolls associated with the first stub roll pair; a second stub roll pair having two vertically downtilted rolls, wherein an opposing second edge portion of the glass sheet is drawn between the two vertically downtilted rolls associated with the second stub roll pair; and a control device which controls the first stub roll pair and the second stub roll pair.

---

1. Material & Component Substitution

Derivative 1.1: Ceramic-Coated Rolls with Magnetic Levitation Drives

• Enabling Description: The vertically downtilted rolls of the first and second stub roll pairs (450a/b, 452a/b) are constructed with a high-purity alumina (Al₂O₃) or silicon carbide (SiC) ceramic core, plasma-coated with a wear-resistant, low-friction composite layer (e.g., tungsten carbide-cobalt). Instead of conventional servo motors and gearboxes, each roll (450a, 450b, 452a, 452b) is independently driven by a three-axis active magnetic levitation system, eliminating physical bearings and contact friction. The magnetic actuators provide both rotational torque and precise non-contact positioning for downtilt and splay adjustments. Roll gap sensing is achieved via eddy current displacement sensors providing feedback to the control device (446) for maintaining a precise non-contact nip force. This arrangement reduces particulate contamination, enables higher operating temperatures, and improves responsiveness and precision of tension control by decoupling mechanical linkages.
• Applies to: Claim 1 (Apparatus), Claim 14 (Method), Claim 19 (System).

graph TD
    A[Control Device 446] --> B(Magnetic Levitation Drive 454a)
    A --> C(Magnetic Levitation Drive 454b)
    A --> D(Magnetic Levitation Drive 456a)
    A --> E(Magnetic Levitation Drive 456b)
    B --> F{Ceramic Roll 450a}
    C --> G{Ceramic Roll 450b}
    D --> H{Ceramic Roll 452a}
    E --> I{Ceramic Roll 452b}
    F -- Draws --> J[Glass Sheet Edge 305a]
    G -- Draws --> J
    H -- Draws --> K[Glass Sheet Edge 305b]
    I -- Draws --> K
    J -- Tension Feedback --> A
    K -- Tension Feedback --> A
    Sensors[Eddy Current Displacement Sensors] --> A
    Sensors --> F
    Sensors --> G
    Sensors --> H
    Sensors --> I

Derivative 1.2: Viscoelastic Polymer Roll Coverings with Piezoelectric Actuators

• Enabling Description: The vertically downtilted rolls (450a/b, 452a/b) are equipped with a conformable, high-temperature viscoelastic polymer covering (e.g., a silicone-polyimide composite) engineered for optimal grip and minimal marking on the glass sheet. Instead of a single drive for each roll, a series of micro-piezoelectric actuators are embedded circumferentially within the roll structure, allowing for localized and dynamic adjustment of the roll's surface topography and effective diameter. This enables fine-tuning of the contact patch and localized shear forces, enhancing micro-level cross-draw tension control. The downtilt and splay angles are adjusted using precision linear piezoelectric stages, offering sub-micrometer positioning resolution. Force feedback is provided by integrated thin-film piezoelectric load sensors within the roll coverings themselves, reporting to the control device (446).
• Applies to: Claim 1 (Apparatus), Claim 14 (Method), Claim 19 (System).

graph TD
    A[Control Device 446] --> B{Piezoelectric Actuators 450a}
    A --> C{Piezoelectric Actuators 450b}
    A --> D{Piezoelectric Actuators 452a}
    A --> E{Piezoelectric Actuators 452b}
    B -- Modifies Surface --> F[Viscoelastic Roll 450a]
    C -- Modifies Surface --> G[Viscoelastic Roll 450b]
    D -- Modifies Surface --> H[Viscoelastic Roll 452a]
    E -- Modifies Surface --> I[Viscoelastic Roll 452b]
    F -- Draws --> J[Glass Sheet Edge 305a]
    G -- Draws --> J
    H -- Draws --> K[Glass Sheet Edge 305b]
    I -- Draws --> K
    J -- Tension Feedback (Piezo Sensors) --> A
    K -- Tension Feedback (Piezo Sensors) --> A
    L[Piezoelectric Positioning Stages] --> F
    L --> G
    L --> H
    L --> I
    L --> A

Derivative 1.3: Fiber Optic Strain Sensors for Real-time Tension Mapping

• Enabling Description: The pull roll apparatus incorporates distributed fiber optic strain sensors (e.g., Fiber Bragg Grating sensors) integrated directly into the core structure of the downtilted rolls (450a/b, 452a/b) and the supporting shafts. These sensors provide a continuous, high-resolution spatial map of the strain exerted by the glass sheet across the contact length of each roll. This real-time strain data is fed into the control device (446), enabling it to calculate and adjust differential torque to individual rolls or localized sections of a roll, thereby optimizing cross-draw and down-draw tension distribution with unprecedented granularity. The traditional load cells (448a) are augmented or replaced by these distributed sensors for superior accuracy and resolution.
• Applies to: Claim 1 (Apparatus), Claim 14 (Method), Claim 19 (System).

graph TD
    A[Control Device 446] --> B(Motor Driver 454a)
    A --> C(Motor Driver 454b)
    A --> D(Motor Driver 456a)
    A --> E(Motor Driver 456b)
    B --> F{Downtilted Roll 450a}
    C --> G{Downtilted Roll 450b}
    D --> H{Downtilted Roll 452a}
    E --> I{Downtilted Roll 452b}
    F -- Fiber Optic Strain Sensors --> J[Sensor Data Acquisition]
    G -- Fiber Optic Strain Sensors --> J
    H -- Fiber Optic Strain Sensors --> J
    I -- Fiber Optic Strain Sensors --> J
    J --> A
    F -- Draws --> K[Glass Sheet Edge 305a]
    G -- Draws --> K
    H -- Draws --> L[Glass Sheet Edge 305b]
    I -- Draws --> L

---

2. Operational Parameter Expansion

Derivative 2.1: Ultra-High-Speed Micro-Sheet Drawing in Partial Vacuum

• Enabling Description: The pull roll apparatus is scaled for manufacturing ultra-thin (e.g., <20 µm) glass micro-sheets at significantly increased drawing velocities, up to 100 m/min. The entire drawing zone, including the pull rolls, operates within a partial vacuum (e.g., 10⁻³ Torr) or inert gas atmosphere to minimize aerodynamic drag, thermal convection effects, and surface oxidation/contamination of the molten glass. The stub rolls (450a/b, 452a/b) feature active internal cooling systems using liquid nitrogen or helium, maintaining precise surface temperatures to prevent glass adhesion and ensure optimal friction characteristics at these high speeds. The control device (446) is enhanced with predictive algorithms to compensate for dynamic pressure differentials and subtle material property variations at accelerated draw rates.
• Applies to: Claim 1 (Apparatus), Claim 14 (Method), Claim 19 (System).

graph TD
    A[Control Device 446 with Predictive ML] --> B(High-Speed Motors)
    B --> C{Active Cooled Rolls 450a}
    B --> D{Active Cooled Rolls 450b}
    C --> E[Glass Micro-Sheet Edge]
    D --> E
    F[Vacuum Chamber] -- Encloses --> C
    F -- Encloses --> D
    F -- Encloses --> G{Glass Micro-Sheet}
    G -- Draw Velocity 100m/min --> E
    H[Vacuum Pump/Inert Gas Supply] --> F
    I[Cryogenic Cooling System] --> C
    I --> D

Derivative 2.2: Extreme Temperature Gradient Operation with Zonal Heating/Cooling

• Enabling Description: The pull roll apparatus is designed to operate with a substantial temperature gradient across the width of the glass sheet at the roll contact points, where the edge portions (305a, 305b) can be at vastly different temperatures. Each roll (450a, 450b, 452a, 452b) incorporates independent internal zonal heating elements (e.g., induction coils) and cooling channels to precisely control its surface temperature profile. This allows for deliberate manipulation of local glass viscosity and ductility at the pull points. The control device (446) integrates real-time thermal imaging feedback (IR thermography) to adjust individual roll temperatures and subsequently tailor cross-draw tension distribution to manage localized thermal stresses or induce specific material flow for forming non-uniform cross-sections.
• Applies to: Claim 1 (Apparatus), Claim 14 (Method), Claim 19 (System).

graph TD
    A[Control Device 446 (Thermal Stress Opt.)] --> B(Zonal Heater/Cooler 450a)
    A --> C(Zonal Heater/Cooler 450b)
    A --> D(Zonal Heater/Cooler 452a)
    A --> E(Zonal Heater/Cooler 452b)
    B --> F{Temp-Controlled Roll 450a}
    C --> G{Temp-Controlled Roll 450b}
    D --> H{Temp-Controlled Roll 452a}
    E --> I{Temp-Controlled Roll 452b}
    F -- Draws & Applies Temp Gradient --> J[Glass Sheet Edge 305a]
    G -- Draws & Applies Temp Gradient --> J
    H -- Draws & Applies Temp Gradient --> K[Glass Sheet Edge 305b]
    I -- Draws & Applies Temp Gradient --> K
    IR[IR Thermography Sensors] --> J
    IR --> K
    IR --> A

Derivative 2.3: Dynamic Oscillatory Splay and Downtilt for Active Flatness Correction

• Enabling Description: The pull roll apparatus features high-frequency electromechanical actuators for independently adjusting the splay angle (θ) and downtilt angle (x) of each stub roll pair (442, 444) in a dynamic, oscillatory manner, with frequencies up to 50 Hz. The control device (446) uses real-time laser profilometry (e.g., structured light or scanning interferometry) of the glass sheet's surface downstream from the rolls to detect instantaneous deviations from target flatness. Based on this feedback, the control device (446) actively oscillates the splay and downtilt angles to generate transient cross-draw and down-draw tension pulses that counteract detected warpage, ripple, or other flatness defects in situ, effectively "ironing" the glass sheet as it forms.
• Applies to: Claim 1 (Apparatus), Claim 14 (Method), Claim 19 (System).

graph TD
    A[Control Device 446 (Adaptive Flatness Alg.)] --> B(High-Freq. Actuator 442 Splay)
    A --> C(High-Freq. Actuator 442 Downtilt)
    A --> D(High-Freq. Actuator 444 Splay)
    A --> E(High-Freq. Actuator 444 Downtilt)
    B --> F{Stub Roll Pair 442}
    C --> F
    D --> G{Stub Roll Pair 444}
    E --> G
    F -- Applies Oscillatory Tension --> H[Glass Sheet]
    G -- Applies Oscillatory Tension --> H
    I[Laser Profilometer] -- Detects Flatness Deviations --> H
    H -- Real-time Feedback --> I
    I --> A

---

3. Cross-Domain Application

Derivative 3.1: Tension Control in Technical Textile Production

• Enabling Description: The pull roll apparatus is adapted for maintaining precise tension in delicate technical fabrics (e.g., carbon fiber weaves, medical textiles, smart fabrics) during continuous processing, such as coating, lamination, or heat-setting. The stub roll pairs apply controlled cross-draw and down-draw tension to the edges of the fabric web, preventing puckering, wrinkling, or distortion, especially in anisotropic materials. The downtilted rolls compensate for inherent material inconsistencies or variations in web width. The control device uses non-contact optical tension sensors and width measurement systems for feedback, adjusting pneumatic cylinder-driven splay/downtilt mechanisms and individual roll torques to maintain a flat, dimensionally stable fabric.
• Applies to: Claim 1 (Apparatus), Claim 14 (Method - "manufacturing a textile web"), Claim 19 (System - "textile manufacturing system").

graph TD
    A[Control Device (Textile Tension)] --> B(Motor 1)
    A --> C(Motor 2)
    B --> D{Stub Roll Pair 1 (Downtilted)}
    C --> E{Stub Roll Pair 2 (Downtilted)}
    D -- Controls Tension --> F[Technical Fabric Web Edge 1]
    E -- Controls Tension --> G[Technical Fabric Web Edge 2]
    F -- Pulls --> H[Technical Fabric Web]
    G -- Pulls --> H
    I[Optical Tension Sensors] --> F
    I --> G
    I --> A
    J[Width Measurement System] --> H
    J --> A

Derivative 3.2: Edge Stress Control in High-Performance Polymer Film Extrusion

• Enabling Description: The pull roll apparatus is reconfigured for precisely controlling edge stresses and maintaining uniform width in newly extruded, still-tacky polymer films (e.g., PTFE, PEN, PI films) at elevated temperatures after a die. The first and second stub roll pairs engage the thickened bead edges of the polymer film, which are subject to neck-in and differential cooling. The vertically downtilted rolls, possibly featuring specialized non-stick coatings (e.g., fluoropolymers) and differential temperature control, exert specific cross-draw and down-draw forces to counteract edge effects, minimize residual stresses, and ensure consistent film width and flatness as it cools. The control device integrates laser micrometers for real-time width and thickness measurements, adjusting roll parameters to prevent edge tearing or folding.
• Applies to: Claim 1 (Apparatus), Claim 14 (Method - "extruding a polymer film"), Claim 19 (System - "polymer film extrusion system").

graph TD
    A[Control Device (Film Extrusion)] --> B(Motor 1)
    A --> C(Motor 2)
    B --> D{Stub Roll Pair 1 (Downtilted, Coated)}
    C --> E{Stub Roll Pair 2 (Downtilted, Coated)}
    D -- Applies Force to Edge Bead --> F[Polymer Film Edge 1]
    E -- Applies Force to Edge Bead --> G[Polymer Film Edge 2]
    F -- Draws --> H[Extruded Polymer Film]
    G -- Draws --> H
    I[Laser Micrometer (Width/Thickness)] --> H
    I --> A
    J[Die Exit] --> H
    K[Temperature Control System] --> D
    K --> E
    K --> A

Derivative 3.3: Thin Metal Foil Drawing and Annealing

• Enabling Description: The pull roll apparatus is adapted for managing tension in thin metal foils (e.g., copper, aluminum, stainless steel) during drawing or continuous annealing processes, particularly for foils less than 50 µm thick. The stub roll pairs, constructed from hardened tool steel with precise surface finishes and possibly induction heated to match the foil temperature, engage the edges of the metal ribbon. The vertically downtilted orientation and adjustable splay/downtilt allow the control device to apply precise transverse and longitudinal tension, preventing edge curling, tearing, or buckling during thermal processing or high-speed drawing operations. Load cells and optical inspection systems provide feedback on edge tension and potential defects, enabling dynamic adjustments.
• Applies to: Claim 1 (Apparatus), Claim 14 (Method - "drawing a metal foil"), Claim 19 (System - "metal foil processing system").

graph TD
    A[Control Device (Metal Foil Tension)] --> B(Motor 1)
    A --> C(Motor 2)
    B --> D{Stub Roll Pair 1 (Downtilted, Heated)}
    C --> E{Stub Roll Pair 2 (Downtilted, Heated)}
    D -- Engages Edge --> F[Metal Foil Edge 1]
    E -- Engages Edge --> G[Metal Foil Edge 2]
    F -- Draws --> H[Thin Metal Foil]
    G -- Draws --> H
    I[Load Cells / Optical Inspection] --> F
    I --> G
    I --> A
    J[Induction Heating System] --> D
    J --> E
    J --> A

---

4. Integration with Emerging Technologies

Derivative 4.1: AI-Driven Predictive Tension Optimization with Digital Twin

• Enabling Description: The control device (446) is augmented with an embedded Artificial Intelligence (AI) module, specifically a deep reinforcement learning agent. This AI agent continuously processes real-time sensor data (e.g., glass temperature profile, thickness, actual tension values from load cells, downtilt/splay angles, motor torques) from the pull roll apparatus and a downstream optical inspection system (flatness, stress). A high-fidelity "digital twin" of the entire glass forming and drawing process runs in parallel, simulating various control parameter changes. The AI agent, trained on historical data and through continuous interaction with the digital twin, predicts optimal adjustments to downtilt, splay, and roll torques to minimize residual stress and maximize flatness, even in anticipation of process disturbances (e.g., changes in melt viscosity, environmental fluctuations). These optimized parameters are then applied to the stub roll pairs by the control device (446).
• Applies to: Claim 1 (Apparatus), Claim 14 (Method), Claim 19 (System).

graph TD
    A[Physical Pull Roll Apparatus] --> B(Sensors: Temp, Thickness, Tension, Flatness)
    B --> C{Control Device 446 (AI Module)}
    C --> A
    C -- Control Commands --> A
    D[Digital Twin (Process Simulation)] --> C
    C -- Simulation Feedback/Training --> D
    C -- Data Logging --> E(Cloud/Historical Data)
    E -- Training Data --> C
    A -- Real-time Data --> D

Derivative 4.2: IoT-Enabled Remote Monitoring and Predictive Maintenance

• Enabling Description: The pull roll apparatus incorporates a network of miniaturized, ruggedized IoT sensors (e.g., wireless accelerometers, embedded temperature sensors in rolls, bearing vibration monitors) connected via a low-power wireless protocol (e.g., LoRaWAN, Zigbee) to a local gateway. This gateway securely transmits aggregated sensor data to a cloud-based IoT platform. The platform employs machine learning algorithms to analyze operational parameters, detect anomalies, predict component failures (e.g., roll bearing wear, motor degradation, refractory coating delamination), and trigger alerts for predictive maintenance. This enables remote diagnostics, proactive scheduling of roll changes, and optimization of maintenance intervals, reducing unscheduled downtime and improving overall equipment effectiveness.
• Applies to: Claim 1 (Apparatus), Claim 14 (Method), Claim 19 (System).

graph TD
    A[Pull Roll Apparatus] --> B(IoT Sensors: Vibration, Temp, Accel.)
    B -- Wireless (LoRaWAN/Zigbee) --> C[IoT Gateway]
    C -- Secure IP --> D[Cloud IoT Platform]
    D --> E(ML for Anomaly Detection)
    D --> F(Predictive Maintenance Dashboard)
    F --> G[Maintenance Team / Operators]
    E -- Alerts --> G
    H[Control Device 446] -- Operational Data --> C

Derivative 4.3: Blockchain-Verified Supply Chain for Roll Materials and Performance Metrics

• Enabling Description: Each stub roll (450a/b, 452a/b) and critical component (e.g., motors, sensors, roll coverings) within the pull roll apparatus has a unique digital identity and lineage recorded on a private blockchain network. Supply chain data, including raw material origin, manufacturing process parameters, quality control measurements, and certification details for each component, are immutably logged as transactions. During operation, key performance metrics (e.g., actual roll wear rates, downtilt adjustment history, accumulated run-time, maintenance records) are also recorded to the blockchain, linked to the specific roll's identity. This provides verifiable transparency for component provenance, authenticity, and long-term performance, enhancing traceability, quality assurance, and enabling trusted data sharing with suppliers or regulatory bodies.
• Applies to: Claim 1 (Apparatus), Claim 14 (Method), Claim 19 (System).

graph TD
    A[Component Manufacturer] --> B(Log Material Cert. to Blockchain)
    B --> C[Blockchain Network]
    C --> D(Supply Chain Participants)
    D --> E[Pull Roll Apparatus Assembly]
    E --> F(Log Assembly & QC to Blockchain)
    F --> C
    G[Control Device 446] -- Operational Metrics --> H(Log Roll Performance to Blockchain)
    H --> C
    I[Maintenance Logs] --> J(Log Service History to Blockchain)
    J --> C
    C -- Immutable Records --> K[Auditors / Quality Assurance]
    C -- Verifiable Data --> L[Optimized Procurement / Lifetime Tracking]

---

5. The "Inverse" or Failure Mode

Derivative 5.1: Controlled De-tensioning and Gap Widening for Crackout Recovery

• Enabling Description: The pull roll apparatus is designed with a rapid-response de-tensioning system. Upon detection of a "crackout" (glass sheet break) by optical sensors or a sudden drop in motor torque, the control device (446) instantly commands the stub roll pairs (442, 444) to: 1) reduce their applied torque to near-zero, effectively de-tensioning the remaining glass sheet in the setting zone, and 2) rapidly increase the gap between the upper and lower rolls of each pair (450a/b, 452a/b) via high-speed pneumatic actuators. This rapid disengagement prevents further propagation of the crack, minimizes damage to the rolls, and creates a wider opening to facilitate quicker and safer re-threading of a new glass ribbon, significantly reducing downtime.
• Applies to: Claim 1 (Apparatus), Claim 14 (Method), Claim 19 (System).

stateDiagram-v2
    [*] --> Normal_Operation
    Normal_Operation --> Crackout_Detected : Optical/Torque Sensor
    Crackout_Detected --> Rapid_De_Tension : Control Device 446
    Rapid_De_Tension --> Gap_Widening : High-Speed Actuators
    Gap_Widening --> Rolls_Open : Facilitates Re-threading
    Rolls_Open --> Standby_for_Rethread
    Standby_for_Rethread --> Normal_Operation : Sheet Re-threaded & Re-engaged
    Normal_Operation --> Emergency_Stop : Catastrophic Failure
    Rapid_De_Tension --> Emergency_Stop

Derivative 5.2: Low-Power Diagnostic Mode with Simulated Load

• Enabling Description: The pull roll apparatus incorporates a "low-power diagnostic mode" for calibration, troubleshooting, and preventative maintenance without engaging a glass sheet. In this mode, the stub roll pairs (442, 444) operate at minimal angular velocity and torque. Each roll is fitted with an internal or external electromagnetic brake/clutch system that can selectively apply a calibrated, simulated drag or resistive load. This allows the control device (446) to test motor responses, verify sensor accuracy, and diagnose electrical or mechanical issues under controlled, light-load conditions, using significantly less energy than full production, and without risking damage to actual glass material.
• Applies to: Claim 1 (Apparatus), Claim 14 (Method), Claim 19 (System).

graph TD
    A[Control Device 446] --> B(Power Management Unit)
    A -- Selects --> C{Operational Mode}
    C -- Normal Production --> D[High Velocity/Torque]
    C -- Diagnostic Mode --> E[Low-Power/Simulated Load]
    E --> F{Stub Roll Motors}
    E --> G{Sensors}
    F --> H(Rolls 450a/b, 452a/b)
    H -- Engages --> I(Electromagnetic Brakes/Clutches)
    I -- Applies --> J[Simulated Load]
    G -- Feedback --> A
    J -- Load Feedback --> A

Derivative 5.3: Integrated Edge Shredding and Recycling System

• Enabling Description: The pull roll apparatus is integrated with a system for immediate processing of the glass sheet's waste edge portions. Instead of simply drawing the waste edges, a set of additional, smaller driven stub rolls (or a modified design of 450a/b, 452a/b) located immediately downstream from the primary tensioning rolls are equipped with hardened, serrated surfaces. These "shredder rolls" actively score and fracture the waste edge portions (e.g., outside the product width 305c, 305d) into cullet. The control device (446) coordinates the speed and gap of these shredder rolls with the main pull rolls to ensure controlled fragmentation without impacting the product region. The resulting cullet is then immediately collected by an integrated pneumatic conveying system for recycling. This reduces manual handling of waste, improves safety, and streamlines the recycling loop.
• Applies to: Claim 1 (Apparatus), Claim 14 (Method), Claim 19 (System).

graph TD
    A[Glass Sheet 305 (Product & Waste Edges)] --> B{Primary Pull Roll Pairs 442, 444}
    B -- Draws & Tension Control --> C[Glass Sheet (Post-Tensioning)]
    C -- Waste Edge Portions --> D{Integrated Shredder Rolls}
    D -- Fragmentation --> E[Glass Cullet]
    D -- Coordinated Control --> A
    E --> F[Pneumatic Conveying System]
    F --> G[Cullet Collection/Recycling]
    H[Control Device 446] --> B
    H --> D

---

Combination Prior Art Scenarios with Open-Source Standards

Here are three scenarios combining the principles of US8627684 with existing open-source standards to enhance defensive publishing.

1. Combination with OPC UA (Open Platform Communications Unified Architecture)

• Scenario: A pull roll apparatus (as per Claim 1) is integrated into a factory-wide distributed control system using the OPC UA standard for data exchange. The control device (446), typically a PLC, acts as an OPC UA server, exposing real-time process variables (e.g., individual roll speeds, torques, calculated cross-draw and down-draw tensions 448a, 448b, downtilt and splay angles, roll gap, glass temperature at nip) as OPC UA nodes. Higher-level Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES), Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems, or cloud-based data analytics platforms (acting as OPC UA clients) securely access this data for holistic process monitoring, quality control, and long-term historical data analysis. This standardization facilitates interoperability, making it easier for various vendors' equipment and software to communicate with the pull roll system.
• Enabling Description: The PLC (446) is configured with an embedded OPC UA server stack, implementing common profiles such as Data Access and Alarms & Conditions. All critical operating parameters, calculated tension values, and diagnostic statuses of the first and second stub roll pairs (442, 444), including individual motor setpoints and actual feedback values, are mapped to OPC UA variables with appropriate data types and access rights. A certificate-based security model, inherent to OPC UA, is employed for secure communication with client applications across the production network. This enables real-time visualization of tension profiles, remote parameter adjustments, and historical data logging to a plant historian, allowing for root cause analysis of flatness or stress defects in the glass sheet 305 in a standardized, vendor-neutral manner.

2. Combination with ROS (Robot Operating System)

• Scenario: A glass manufacturing system (as per Claim 19) utilizes the pull roll apparatus (as per Claim 1) in conjunction with robotic manipulators for automated tasks such as crackout recovery or automated roll changeouts. The control device (446) interfaces with a robot controller, both communicating via ROS messages and services. Upon detection of a crackout event (e.g., loss of tension, as described in the "Inverse" derivatives), the pull roll apparatus enters a safe state (e.g., rolls open, motors stopped). The ROS-enabled robot, receiving commands and status updates from the pull roll control system, then executes a pre-programmed sequence for glass sheet re-threading or roll replacement, enhancing automation and reducing manual intervention.
• Enabling Description: The control device (446) is equipped with a ROS bridge or directly implements a ROS client library. It publishes relevant state information (e.g., "system_status," "roll_positions," "tension_fault") as ROS topics and exposes services for critical commands (e.g., "open_rolls," "retract_actuators"). A dedicated robot controller, running ROS, subscribes to these topics and invokes services to coordinate its actions. For a crackout event, the pull roll's state transition to "Rolls_Open" triggers the robot to move to a designated re-threading position, extending a specialized gripper or guide mechanism. The robot's vision system (also ROS-integrated) could provide feedback on glass sheet alignment, which is then fed back to the pull roll control for fine-tuning roll engagement.

3. Combination with ANSI/ISA-88 Batch Control Standard

• Scenario: The method for manufacturing a glass sheet (as per Claim 14) is implemented within a batch-oriented or semi-continuous production environment, where the pull roll apparatus (as per Claim 1) functions as a "Unit Procedure" or "Operation" within a larger ISA-88 compliant batch process. The control device (446) of the pull roll apparatus adheres to the ISA-88 Physical Model, acting as a "Control Module" that encapsulates the logic for controlling the downtilted rolls, splay, and torque. Higher-level "Procedure" and "Operation" layers (e.g., managed by an MES) dictate the specific tension profiles and drawing sequences needed for different glass product recipes, coordinating the pull roll operation with other upstream (melting, forming) and downstream (scoring, separation) units.
• Enabling Description: The control device (446) implements the control logic for the first and second stub roll pairs (442, 444) according to ISA-88 Control Module definitions, exposing a standardized interface (e.g., "StartPull," "StopPull," "SetTensionProfile," "AdjustDowntilt") to its parent "Operation" module. Each specific glass sheet recipe defines a unique "TensionProfile" parameter set, including target cross-draw and down-draw tensions (448a, 448b), downtilt angles, and splay angles, which are passed to the pull roll control module. This modular approach allows for flexible recipe management, simplified scaling of production, and reuse of control code across different glass products or even different pull roll apparatuses within an ISA-88 compliant plant. The pull roll apparatus's response to these recipe parameters, including actual vs. target tension, is reported back to the ISA-88 supervisory layer for batch reporting and exception handling.