Invalidity dossier

US 8495242

Automated media delivery system

Current assignee: Equil IP Holdings LLC

Added 9/21/2026, 10:46:24 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges1 lawsuit on fileasserted by Equil IP Holdings LLC

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US8495242B2

Title: Automated media delivery system

Patent number / application: US8495242B2; application US12/713,637.

Assignee information (as listed): Original assignee Automated Media Processing Solutions Inc; current assignee listed as Equil Ip Holdings LLC / Automated Media Processing Solutions Inc. Inventors: Sean Barger, Steve Johnson, Matt Butler, Jerry Destremps, David Pochron, Trent Brown.

Key dates: Prior art date and priority date 1999-10-21; filing date 2010-02-26; publication date 2013-07-23; legal status "Expired - Fee Related," with adjusted expiration 2020-01-05.

Purpose (from the supplied text): The invention "relates to software systems. More particularly, the invention relates to an Internet server-based software system that provides delivery of automated graphics and other media to Web sites for access by an end user or consumer."

Plain-language scope (from the supplied text): The system concerns automated delivery of graphics and other media to Web sites. The excerpt describes the then-current state of the art as offering consumers zooming and panning of images, and pages with three-dimensional imagery resembling rooms rather than brochures. The background discusses media content used in interactive digital media, object mapping data kept separate from Frame Data, and converting existing non-interactive media (movies, videos, advertising, television) into interactive digital media. The classification includes web browsing optimization, multimedia data retrieval, metadata, and hyperlinking. The listed prior-art keyword set is transcoding, act, media content, media, transcoded, indicating a transcoding-related disclosure.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US8495242](/patent/US8495242)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the claims, detailed description, figures, or specific transcoding steps. The background passage referencing TrueSpectra is truncated mid-sentence, and the excerpt indicates omitted text. Therefore this overview cannot state the exact claimed scope, embodiments, or how transcoding is performed.

Prepared from the supplied patent text only; no external research on litigation, ownership, validity, or prior art was conducted.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:01:09 PM

Cases on file (1)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8495242. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Equil IP Holdings LLC

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring