Invalidity dossier

US 9158745

Optimization of media content using generated intermediate media content

Current assignee: Equil IP Holdings LLC

Added 9/21/2026, 12:48:49 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges1 lawsuit on fileasserted by Equil IP Holdings LLC

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US9158745B2

Title: "Optimization of media content using generated intermediate media content"

Patent number / application: US9158745B2; application US13/752,110; pre-grant publication US20130138774A1.

Inventors: Sean Barger, Brian Rice, Matt Butler, and David Pochron.

Assignee of record (as listed): Equil IP Holdings LLC and Automated Media Processing Solutions Inc; original assignee Equilibrium.

Key dates (as listed): Priority date 1999-10-21; filing date 2013-01-28; publication date 2015-10-13. Status: Expired – Lifetime, adjusted expiration 2020-07-20.

Purpose (from the supplied text): The patent relates to software systems, specifically an Internet server-based software system that provides delivery of automated graphics and other media to Web sites for access by an end user or consumer. The title indicates optimization of media content using generated intermediate media content.

Plain-language scope (from the supplied text): The excerpt does not set out claims or a detailed written description. Beyond the title and the stated field, the supplied material identifies prior-art keywords (media content, content, media, operations, image) and classifications relating to information retrieval, browsing optimization/content distillation, multimedia data, and document formatting/transformation. The background notes that the current state of the art offers consumers zooming and panning capabilities, and critiques incremental three-dimensional imagery features. It also summarizes several references (Dudley AU-A-53031/98; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,355,472 and 5,708,845; Tyan et al. EP 0843276; and TrueSpectra's products). These summaries describe prior art only; they do not define the claimed invention.

What the excerpt does not establish:

  • The actual claims, their scope, or claim limitations.
  • How "intermediate media content" is generated, stored, or used.
  • The detailed description, figures, or specific embodiments.
  • The nature, outcome, or merits of any litigation or PTAB proceeding.
  • Ownership transfers, security interests, or current legal status as a legal conclusion.
  • Validity, enforceability, or the applicability of any cited prior art.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US9158745](/patent/US9158745)/en (fetched 2026-09-21).

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:01:00 PM

Cases on file (1)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9158745. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Equil IP Holdings LLC

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring