Patent 12098063

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Proceedings on file (1)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Vermeer Manufacturing Company

Final Written Decision
Filed
Jan 7, 2025
Last modified
Jun 30, 2026
Petitioner
Kubota North America Corporation et al.
Patent owner
Vermeer Manufacturing Company
Outcome
Final Written Decision

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

✓ Generated

The provided search results do not contain specific claim-level outcomes, judge panels, petition grounds, institution decision details, or appeal information for PGR2025-00016 for US12098063. The results mention PGR2025-00016 in the context of it being filed by "Kubota North America Corporation" and having a status of "Pending - Instituted" in one search result, and "Final Written Decision" in the user-provided prompt, which I must prioritize. Other search results refer to different PGR cases (e.g., PGR2025-00025 for Multi-Color Corp. v. Brook & Whittle Ltd., and several PGRs for Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC v. Halozyme Inc.). There is a district court case, Vermeer Manufacturing Company v. Kubota North America Corporation et al (4:24-cv-00799) in the Northern District of Texas, where US12098063 is asserted, along with other patents. However, this doesn't provide the specifics of the PTAB proceeding itself.

Given the current search results, I cannot fill in the detailed information like judge panel, petition grounds, institution decision, or the specific claim-level outcome of the Final Written Decision for PGR2025-00016. I can only confirm the parties and the status as provided.

Proceedings overview

There is one AIA trial proceeding on US patent 12098063. This proceeding, PGR2025-00016, is listed as having reached a "Final Written Decision," meaning the patent has been tested at the PTAB. Without the specific details of the Final Written Decision, the bottom-line defensive posture for a defendant is currently unclear, as it is unknown which, if any, claims were invalidated or sustained.

PGR2025-00016 — Kubota North America Corporation et al. v. Vermeer Manufacturing Company

  • Type: Post-Grant Review
  • Filed: 2025-01-07
  • Status: Final Written Decision — This proceeding has concluded with a decision on the patentability of the challenged claims.
  • Judge panel: Information not found in public search results.
  • Petition grounds: Specific claims, prior art, and statutory bases (§ 102 / § 103 / § 112) for the petition were not found in the public search results.
  • Institution decision: Details regarding the institution decision (instituted / denied / partially instituted) and reasoning were not found in the public search results.
  • Final Written Decision (if issued): The specific verdict at a claim-level granularity, including which independent or dependent claims were canceled or held patentable, was not found in the public search results. The reasoning of the panel is also unavailable from the provided search.
  • Settlement / termination: Information regarding a settlement or other termination of the proceeding was not found in the public search results.
  • Appeal: Information regarding any appeal to the Federal Circuit, including docket number, issues on appeal, and disposition, was not found in the public search results.
  • Defensive value: Without the outcome of the Final Written Decision, the defensive value of this proceeding is indeterminate. If claims were canceled, it would significantly weaken the patent. If claims were sustained, it would suggest the patent is more robust against validity challenges.

Strategic summary

The patent US12098063 has been subjected to a single Post-Grant Review (PGR) proceeding, PGR2025-00016, which has reached a Final Written Decision. However, the outcomes at a claim-level (CANCELED vs. SUSTAINED vs. UNTESTED) are not available from the provided information. Therefore, it is currently unknown whether the patent has been narrowed.

Regarding the estoppel landscape, if Kubota North America Corporation et al. challenged claims in PGR2025-00016, they (and their privies) would be estopped under § 315(e)(2) from raising any ground they raised or reasonably could have raised in the PGR. Without knowing the specific grounds challenged or the outcome, it is impossible to definitively state which prior-art grounds are still available for a new defendant.

A pattern signal is that Kubota North America Corporation is actively challenging this patent family, as indicated by the PGR. Kubota is also a defendant in a district court case where US12098063 is being asserted.

Recommended next steps

Since the Final Written Decision for PGR2025-00016 has been issued, the critical next step is to obtain and review the full decision document to understand the claim-level outcomes. This document would specify which claims of US12098063, if any, were found unpatentable and which were confirmed as patentable. This information is crucial for any defendant facing assertion of this patent, as invalidated claims cannot be asserted. The USPTO PTAB Decisions portal is the authoritative source for such documents.

Generated 7/1/2026, 12:45:36 AM