Patent 10057322

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Proceedings on file (1)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: GOOGLE LLC

1 active
Trial Instituted
Filed
May 23, 2025
Last modified
May 1, 2026
Petitioner
Google LLC
Inventor
Christopher Newton et al

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

✓ Generated

Proceedings overview

One active Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceeding, IPR2025-01010, is currently on file for US patent 10057322. The status is "Trial Instituted," indicating that the patent is actively undergoing a challenge to its validity before the PTAB, but no claims have been invalidated or sustained yet. This gives a defendant a posture of watchful waiting, as the patent's claims are still subject to potential invalidation.

IPR2025-01010 — Google LLC v. Sandpiper Cdn LLC

  • Type: Inter Partes Review
  • Filed: 2025-05-23
  • Status: Trial Instituted. The PTAB has decided to proceed with a trial to review the patentability of at least some claims. This proceeding is active.
  • Judge panel: Michael T. Cygan is listed as a Panel Judge associated with this case. Due to a USPTO policy change effective October 20, 2025, institution decisions are made by the USPTO Director, often via summary notices, with a three-member panel assigned to conduct the subsequent trial. The full composition of the trial panel is not publicly available in the search results.
  • Petition grounds: Specific claims challenged, prior art, and statutory basis are typically detailed in the institution decision document. Given the USPTO's new policy for "summary notices" for routine institution decisions, this detailed information could not be readily found in the provided search results.
  • Institution decision: Instituted on 2025-12-01. The reasoning for institution, beyond the fact that a trial was deemed appropriate, is not detailed in the available search results, likely due to the USPTO's policy of issuing summary notices for routine institution decisions.
  • Final Written Decision (if issued): Not yet issued. The Final Written Decision is due by December 1, 2026, which is 12 months from the institution date.
  • Settlement / termination: No information about settlement or termination is available, consistent with its "Trial Instituted" status.
  • Appeal: No appeal has occurred as no Final Written Decision has been issued.
  • Defensive value: This active IPR proceeding means that the patentability of US10057322 is currently being challenged. For a defendant facing assertion of this patent, the existence of this IPR creates uncertainty regarding the patent's validity. The outcome of this proceeding will significantly impact the strength of the patent and any ongoing or future litigation.

Strategic summary

As of 2026-05-15, there is one active IPR, IPR2025-01010, challenging US patent 10057322. No claims of the patent have been canceled or sustained by a Final Written Decision, as the proceeding is still in the trial phase. Therefore, all claims of US10057322 are currently considered "untested" by a final PTAB decision, though their validity is actively under review.

Regarding the estoppel landscape, as IPR2025-01010 is still ongoing, no estoppel has yet applied under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2). Once a Final Written Decision is issued, the petitioner (Google LLC) and its privies would be estopped from asserting invalidity grounds in future proceedings that were raised or reasonably could have been raised in the IPR. For other potential defendants, the prior-art grounds challenged in this IPR remain available until a Final Written Decision is issued. The petitioner in this case is Google LLC, indicating a significant entity is challenging the patent.

Recommended next steps

For a defendant facing assertion of US patent 10057322, the primary recommendation is to closely monitor the progress of IPR2025-01010. The institution decision was on 2025-12-01, meaning the Final Written Decision is statutorily due by 2026-12-01. Key milestones to watch for include the issuance of the Final Written Decision, which will determine the patentability of the challenged claims. A favorable outcome for the petitioner could lead to the cancellation of claims, significantly weakening the patent owner's position. Conversely, if the patent owner prevails, it would strengthen the patent against future IPR challenges on the same or similar grounds.

No other PTAB activity for US10057322 is currently on file.

Generated 5/15/2026, 6:46:41 AM