The docket

Patent litigations.

6,606 cases tracked. Click any row for full case detail; use the buckets below to slice by patent, plaintiff, or defendant. Manage cases (upload CSV, edit, delete) in Admin.

Demand letter analyzer

You got a patent demand letter. Now what?

Paste the letter — we extract the asserted patents, identify the asserter, characterize their litigation history, flag validity vulnerabilities, and draft a sample response letter your attorney can review. Free, private, ~2-3 minutes.

Analyze a letter →

Patent litigation filed per year

1986: 2 cases'861988: 1 case1990: 1 case'901992: 1 case1993: 1 case'941996: 3 cases1997: 2 cases1998: 3 cases'981999: 3 cases2000: 3 cases2001: 5 cases'022003: 10 cases2004: 4 cases2005: 13 cases2006: 15 cases'062007: 17 cases2008: 20 cases2009: 12 cases2010: 39 cases'102011: 36 cases2012: 68 cases2013: 110 cases2014: 95 cases'142015: 107 cases2016: 103 cases2017: 163 cases2018: 171 cases'182019: 198 cases2020: 226 cases2021: 254 cases2022: 358 cases'222023: 321 cases2024: 548 cases2025: 758 cases7582026: 333 cases'26
6,606 tracked cases by filing year.

Analyze a patent

Drop a US patent number — we’ll verify it on Google Patents and generate the full invalidity dossier.

Log in to analyze a patent

By industry

High-Tech (T)(68)Other (O)(43)Medical (M)(5)

All litigations

CasePatentsCourtFiledStatus
Prism Technologies LLC v. Research in Motion, Ltd. et al.8:08-cv-00537-LES-TDT
7290288
United States District Court for the District of Nebraska2008-12-29settled
Eli Lilly and Company v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.1:08-cv-01629
5023269
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana2008-12-04dismissed
Barco N.V. v. Technology Properties Ltd. et al.5:2008-cv-05398
5604915
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose)2008-12-01various orders 2010–2011; '584 patent non-asserted via covenant
Barco N.V. v. Technology Properties Ltd. et al.5:08-cv-05398-JF
5784584
U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal.2008-12-01consolidated
Eli Lilly and Company v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. et al.
5023269
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana2008-11-24resolved
Eli Lilly and Company v. Lupin Limited et al.1:08-cv-01596
5023269
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana2008-11-24dismissed
Telematics Corp. v. DataTrac Corp.1:08-cv-03504
5428546
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division2008-11-13closed
Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. et al.8:08-cv-02188
7158118713998372627607414611
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland2008-08-20dismissed with prejudice after confidential settlement
Digital Security Systems Corporation, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et a…2:08-cv-00316
6052780
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division2008-08-11voluntarily dismissed without prejudice
Celgene Corporation et al. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.2:08-cv-03357
7141018604550163157206420399656197665619776673784
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey2008-07-03dismissed
Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Janam Technologies LLC1:08-cv-00340-JJF
533482158353666714969
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware2008-06-09settled and dismissed
Technology Properties Limited v. HTC Corporation
5530890
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas2008-06-04dismissed without prejudice
Wild Sales, LLC et al.4:08-cv-00770
6091343
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis)2008-05-29—
Mirror Worlds, LLC v. Apple Inc.6:08-cv-00088
6725427600622766383136768999
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division2008-03-14judgment
Automotive Technologies International, Inc. v. Delphi Corporation et al.2:08-cv-11048
6833516648408072439457407029
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan (Southern Division)2008-03-11judgment
Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Symantec Corp. et al.8:08-cv-00203
5490216
California Central District Court2008-02-19Dismissed
Automotive Technologies International, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.2:08-cv-00057
6850824
E.D. Tex. (Marshall Division)2008-02-11closed
HTC Corporation et al. v. Technology Properties Limited et al.5:08-cv-00882-PSG
5530890580933654407496598148
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division2008-02-08partially dismissed; '890 claims dismissed Sept. 19, 2013; '336 reached jury
ASUSTeK Computer Inc. v. Technology Properties Ltd. et al.5:08-cv-00884-JF
57845845440749580933658096235809638
U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal.2008-02-08settled/dismissed
HTC Corp. et al. v. Technology Properties Ltd. et al.5:08-cv-00882
5809336578458454407496598148
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California2008-02-08judgment