The docket

Patent litigations.

6,606 cases tracked. Click any row for full case detail; use the buckets below to slice by patent, plaintiff, or defendant. Manage cases (upload CSV, edit, delete) in Admin.

Demand letter analyzer

You got a patent demand letter. Now what?

Paste the letter — we extract the asserted patents, identify the asserter, characterize their litigation history, flag validity vulnerabilities, and draft a sample response letter your attorney can review. Free, private, ~2-3 minutes.

Analyze a letter →

Patent litigation filed per year

1986: 2 cases'861988: 1 case1990: 1 case'901992: 1 case1993: 1 case'941996: 3 cases1997: 2 cases1998: 3 cases'981999: 3 cases2000: 3 cases2001: 5 cases'022003: 10 cases2004: 4 cases2005: 13 cases2006: 15 cases'062007: 17 cases2008: 20 cases2009: 12 cases2010: 39 cases'102011: 36 cases2012: 68 cases2013: 110 cases2014: 95 cases'142015: 107 cases2016: 103 cases2017: 163 cases2018: 171 cases'182019: 198 cases2020: 226 cases2021: 254 cases2022: 358 cases'222023: 321 cases2024: 548 cases2025: 758 cases7582026: 333 cases'26
6,606 tracked cases by filing year.

Analyze a patent

Drop a US patent number — we’ll verify it on Google Patents and generate the full invalidity dossier.

By industry

All litigations

CasePatentsCourtFiledStatus
Dell Technologies Inc. v. VideoLabs, Inc.IPR2022-00701Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)2022-03-17not instituted
CyboEnergy, Inc. v. Aptos Solar Technology, LLC6:22-cv-00281W.D. Tex. (Waco Div.)2022-03-16dismissed
Robocast, Inc. v. YouTube, LLC et al.1:22-cv-00304-RGAU.S. District Court for the District of Delaware2022-03-07stayed
Robocast, Inc. v. Netflix, Inc.1:22-cv-00305-RGAU.S. District Court for the District of Delaware2022-03-07judgment
Vision Works IP Corp. v. Nissan North American Inc.3:22-cv-00301California Southern District Court2022-03-04Closed
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Netlist, Inc.IPR2022-00639Patent Trial and Appeal Board2022-03-02final written decision all challenged claims unpatentable; rehearing denied
Arbutus Biopharma Corp. et al. v. Moderna, Inc. et al.1:22-cv-00252U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware2022-02-28settled
Arbutus Biopharma Corporation et al. v. Moderna, Inc. et al.1:22-cv-00252-JDWU.S. District Court for the District of Delaware2022-02-28settled (on appeal)
10x Genomics, Inc. et al. v. NanoString Technologies, Inc.1:22-cv-00261U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware2022-02-28Active
Apple, Inc. v. CPC Patent Technologies Pty LtdIPR2022-00600Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)2022-02-23Final Written Decision
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.IPR2022-00575; IPR2022-00576; IPR2022-01283; Fed. Cir. Nos. 2024-1726, 2024-1727, 2024-1728PTAB to Fed. Cir.2022-02-16affirmed
Power2B Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.IPR2022-00325Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)2022-02-15Final Written Decision
Staton Techiya, LLC et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.2:22-cv-00053-JRG-RSP (consolidated into lead case 2:21-cv-00413-JRG-RSP)U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division2022-02-14closed; on appeal
Lemko Corporation v. Microsoft Corporation et al.3:22-cv-00363-L-BTU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Dallas Division)2022-02-14closed
CommWorks Solutions, LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al.6:22-cv-00156W.D. Tex. (Judge Albright)2022-02-11active
CommWorks Solutions, LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al.6:22-cv-00156W.D. Tex.2022-02-11pending
SpaceTime3D, Inc. v. Apple Inc.6:22-cv-00149; 1:23-cv-00553-ADA-DHU.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco Division; later transferred to Austin Division2022-02-10Transferred; ongoing in Austin Division
SpaceTime3D, Inc. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al.2:22-cv-00049-RWSU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas2022-02-10Settled and closed
Sentient Sensors, LLC v. Xilinx Incorporated1:22-cv-00173-MND. Delaware2022-02-08Stayed pending IPR; active
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Videology Imaging Solutions Inc.1:22-cv-00157D. Del. (Judge Andrews)2022-02-03dismissed with prejudice