Litigation

Robocast, Inc. v. YouTube, LLC et al.

stayed

1:22-cv-00304-RGA

Auto-generating section 1 of 5: Case overview & background…

Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.

Filed
2022-03-07

Patents at issue (3)

8965932
7155451
8280819

Plaintiffs (1)

Summary

Robocast asserted U.S. Patent Nos. 8,965,932, 7,155,451, and 8,280,819 against YouTube and Google. The case was stayed in light of the Netflix decision, and indirect/willful infringement claims on the expired '819 and '932 patents were dismissed on November 14, 2022.

Case overview & background

Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

Key legal developments & outcome

Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

In the news

What the press has reported about this case, summarized with links to the source articles.

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

Plaintiff representatives

Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

Defendant representatives

Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).