The docket

Patent litigations.

6,606 cases tracked. Click any row for full case detail; use the buckets below to slice by patent, plaintiff, or defendant. Manage cases (upload CSV, edit, delete) in Admin.

Demand letter analyzer

You got a patent demand letter. Now what?

Paste the letter — we extract the asserted patents, identify the asserter, characterize their litigation history, flag validity vulnerabilities, and draft a sample response letter your attorney can review. Free, private, ~2-3 minutes.

Analyze a letter →

Patent litigation filed per year

1986: 2 cases'861988: 1 case1990: 1 case'901992: 1 case1993: 1 case'941996: 3 cases1997: 2 cases1998: 3 cases'981999: 3 cases2000: 3 cases2001: 5 cases'022003: 10 cases2004: 4 cases2005: 13 cases2006: 15 cases'062007: 17 cases2008: 20 cases2009: 12 cases2010: 39 cases'102011: 36 cases2012: 68 cases2013: 110 cases2014: 95 cases'142015: 107 cases2016: 103 cases2017: 163 cases2018: 171 cases'182019: 198 cases2020: 226 cases2021: 254 cases2022: 358 cases'222023: 321 cases2024: 548 cases2025: 758 cases7582026: 333 cases'26
6,606 tracked cases by filing year.

Analyze a patent

Drop a US patent number — we’ll verify it on Google Patents and generate the full invalidity dossier.

By industry

All litigations

CasePatentsCourtFiledStatus
Samesurf, Inc. v. Intuit, Inc.2:22-cv-02060U.S. District Court, Central District of California2022-03-29closed
Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. v. Fusion Orthopedics, LLC2:22-cv-00490U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona2022-03-29settled and closed
Samesurf, Inc. v. Intuit Inc.3:22-cv-00412U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California2022-03-29Invalidated
Eagle View Technologies, Inc. v. GAF Materials LLC2:22-cv-00215U.S. District Court, District of Utah2022-03-28—
Eagle View Technologies, Inc. et al. v. GAF Materials, LLC2:22-cv-00215U.S. District Court for the District of Utah2022-03-28active
Atlas Global Technologies LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al.2:22-cv-00103U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas2022-03-28Active
Sam's West, Inc. et al. v. BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc.6:22-cv-00587United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division2022-03-22Stayed pending IPR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Handa Pharmaceuticals, Inc.1:22-cv-00352U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware2022-03-21Unverified
AML IP LLC v. Hallmark Cards, Inc. et al.4:22-cv-00214U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division2022-03-18partly dismissed
Acuitas Therapeutics Inc. v. Genevant Sciences GmbH et al.gov.uscourts.nysd.576814U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York2022-03-18Voluntarily dismissed
Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc. v. Genevant Sciences GmbH et al.1:22-cv-02229U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York2022-03-18dismissed
Acuitas Therapeutics Inc. v. Genevant Sciences GmbH et al.1:22-cv-02229U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Manhattan)2022-03-18dismissed
Acuitas Therapeutics Inc. v. Genevant Sciences GmbH et al.1:22-cv-02229-MKVUnited States District Court for the Southern District of New York2022-03-18dismissed
Acuitas Therapeutics Inc. v. Genevant Sciences GmbH et al.1:22-cv-02229U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York2022-03-18dismissed
Acuitas Therapeutics Inc. v. Genevant Sciences GmbH et al.1:22-cv-02229-MKVU.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York2022-03-18dismissed
Amphenol Corp. v. PPC Broadband, Inc.IPR2022-00718USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board2022-03-18final written decision; affirmed on appeal
Amphenol Corp. v. PPC Broadband, Inc.IPR2022-00719Patent Trial and Appeal Board, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office2022-03-18final written decision; claims unpatentable; rehearing denied
Amphenol Corp. v. PPC Broadband, Inc.IPR2022-00720USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board2022-03-18final written decision; rehearing denied; on appeal; affirmed
Fintiv, Inc. v. PayPal Holdings, Inc.6:22-cv-00288-ADAU.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco Division2022-03-17judgment
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. 3xlogic, Inc.1:22-cv-00344D. Del. (Judge Andrews)2022-03-17active