Litigation
Uber Technologies, Inc. v. X One, Inc.
reversed PTAB decision19-1164
Auto-generating section 1 of 4: Case overview & background…
Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.
- Terminated
- 2020-05-05
Patents at issue (2)
Plaintiffs (1)
Defendants (1)
Summary
Uber sought inter partes review, arguing claims of patent 9185522 were obvious. The PTAB initially found the claims not unpatentable, but the Federal Circuit reversed, finding the Board erred in its obviousness determination regarding specific claim limitations.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).