Litigation
Technology Properties Limited LLC et al. v. Huawei Technologies Co.
remanded16-1306
Auto-generating section 1 of 4: Case overview & background…
Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.
- Filed
- 2015-12-13
Patents at issue (1)
Plaintiffs (3)
Defendants (1)
Summary
Consolidated appeal from the N.D. Cal. cases against Huawei, ZTE, Samsung, LG, and Nintendo. The Federal Circuit affirmed in part and vacated in part the district court's claim construction, upholding prosecution-history disclaimer requiring an oscillator whose frequency is not fixed by any external crystal, but rejecting the requirement that the oscillator not require a control signal; remanded. Companion docket numbers: 16-1307, 16-1309, 16-1310, 16-1311.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).