10 known cases. View patent page →
ConforMIS sued Wright Medical Group in the District of Massachusetts. The case settled/licensed in April 2015 with a fully paid-up worldwide license. Narrative states the '983 patent was not identified as asserted in this case.
ConforMIS sued Smith & Nephew in the District of Massachusetts. Litigation was stayed in April 2017 pending 16 IPRs; PTAB held several patents unpatentable, and the case settled in September 2018. Narrative states the '983 patent was not identified as asserted in this case.
Conformis sued Medacta USA and Medacta International in the District of Delaware. Amended complaints were filed in December 2019 and October 2020; later service-of-process and personal-jurisdiction rulings occurred in 2022. Narrative states the '983 patent was not identified as asserted in this case.
Conformis sued Zimmer Biomet in the District of Delaware. The case was consolidated with Medacta for pretrial; a stipulation of partial dismissal was filed May 29, 2020, and Zimmer settled in May 2020. Narrative states the '983 patent was not identified as asserted in this case.
Zimmer US and Zimmer Biomet filed a declaratory-judgment action against Conformis in the District of Delaware. The case was pending per the last docket update. Narrative states the '983 patent was not identified as asserted in this case.
Conformis sued Wright Medical Technology and Tornier in the District of Delaware. The case settled in July 2021, with Stryker paying $15M after acquiring Wright. Narrative states the '983 patent was not identified as asserted in this case.
Conformis sued DePuy Synthes in the District of Delaware. The case was pending at the pleading/discovery stage. Narrative states the '983 patent was not identified as asserted in this case; various 10/xxxxxxx patents are mentioned in the DePuy Synthes action but not specified.
Conformis sued Bodycad and Exactech in the Middle District of Florida. The case was pending per the record reviewed. Narrative states the '983 patent was not identified as asserted in this case.
Conformis sued Exactech in the Middle District of Florida. The case was pending per the record reviewed. Narrative states the '983 patent was not identified as asserted in this case.
Separate case where Conformis was the defendant, involving Bonutti's knee-surgery patents. Narrative states it is unrelated to the '983 patent.