Litigation
Untitled case
stayed, consolidated1:12-cv-01068
Auto-generating section 1 of 4: Case overview & background…
Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.
Patents at issue (1)
Plaintiffs (1)
Summary
One of two 2012 N.D. Ohio infringement cases filed by Progressive asserting U.S. 6,064,970. The case was subject to stay motions pending CBM review and was consolidated with other N.D. Ohio cases for Local Patent Rule 3.5/3.6 invalidity and unenforceability contentions; defendant mapping was not confirmed in the narrative.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).