Invalidity dossier

US 9628512

Added 9/21/2026, 10:22:41 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 9,628,512 B2

Title: Malicious relay detection on networks

Patent number / application: US 9,628,512 B2; Application US 14/644,186; Publication US 2015/0264083 A1

Inventors: Ryan James Prenger, Nicolas Beauchesne, Karl Matthew Lynn

Assignee of record (as listed): Vectra Networks Inc (original assignee); current assignee listed as Vectra AI Inc

Key dates: Priority date 2014-03-11; filing date 2015-03-10; publication 2015-09-17; granted 2017-04-18; anticipated expiration 2035-03-10; status Active

Classifications: H04L63/14 (detecting/protecting against malicious traffic), including H04L63/1475 (passive attacks), H04L63/1425 (traffic logging/anomaly detection), H04L63/1466 (active attacks involving interception, injection, modification, spoofing); G06F16/285 (clustering/classification) and G06F17/30598

Purpose (from the text): To detect network attacks that use relays, addressing the harmful situation where an outside entity takes control of a host computer inside a company or organization and uses it as a source for attacks against other targets or to exfiltrate data from within the organization. The text notes this is difficult to detect because the attack may be carried out over time and often is mistaken for "normal" network behavior until data is analyzed over a longer period.

Plain-language scope (as described): A relay detection engine extracts information from sessions (communications between a source and destination computer) and categorizes network communications according to relay behaviors and categorization constraints, such as label constraints and flow direction constraints. Once a session is categorized as a known relay behavior, historical data concerning the involved hosts may be retrieved and used with the newly categorized behavior to score the hosts, or the likelihood that the communication is part of a relay attack. A score module may check thresholds, correlate detections with durable host IDs, generate alerts, and respond to queries. A detection unit (Type A) is described for detecting relay communication attacks.

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide verbatim claim language or the full specification, does not establish litigation, ownership-transfer validity, patent validity, or prior art, and does not contain a complete list of figures or reference numerals.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9628512/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:01:39 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9628512. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.