Invalidity dossier

US 9206806

Solids pump having feed guides

Current assignee: Air Products and Chemicals Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 4:28:54 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 9,206,806 B1

Title: "Solids pump having feed guides"

Patent number / kind code: US 9,206,806 B1 (granted publication; the record also lists US 9,206,806 B1 against application US 14/452,195)

Inventors: Luis Granados; Jeffery Allen Rader

Original assignee: General Electric Company. The listing also shows a later assignment to Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2019-10-22); the record labels the listed assignees as potentially inaccurate.

Key dates (as listed, and characterized in the record as assumptions): priority date 2014-08-05; filing date 2014-08-05; publication/grant date 2015-12-08; anticipated expiration 2034-08-05. Legal status shown as "Expired - Fee Related."

Purpose: The disclosure concerns solids pumps that convey a solid feed from one industrial process to another. Various industrial processes convey solids whose differing sizes, shapes, consistencies, and operating conditions (temperature, pressure, humidity) can impose large torques and forces on the transport equipment. The stated aim is to direct solid feedstock out of a passage of the solids pump.

Plain-language scope (from the supplied text): The system is a solid feed pump with a housing, a rotor in the housing, a curved passage between rotor and housing, at least one outlet coupled to the curved passage, and multiple solid feed guides extending across the curved passage near the outlet. Each guide directs solid feed toward the outlet and sits at a different circumferential location about the rotor's rotational axis. Embodiments use a staggered arrangement: an initial guide diverts part of the solids while some continue past it, so subsequent guides handle smaller portions and experience less force, flex, or adjustment — allowing them to sit closer to the passage's bottom side (e.g., the hub's outer surface) without rubbing. Alternative embodiments describe first and second guides whose ends are separated from the hub's lateral surface by differing minimal or radial offset distances, with the first exceeding the second. FIG. 1 is a schematic of such a pump; FIG. 2 a cutaway perspective; FIG. 3 a cross-sectional side view with multiple guides. The text mentions the pump may be a Posimetric® pump made by General Electric.

What the excerpt does not establish: It supplies no claims text, no complete description, no abstract, no figures, no prior-art references, and no examiner reasoning. It therefore cannot establish claim scope, validity, patentability, or the accuracy of any listed date, status, or assignee.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9206806/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:50:48 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9206806. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.