Invalidity dossier
US 9010578
Discharge arrangement having a connecting device between a multi-component cartridge and an accessory part
Current assignee: Medix Systems AG
Added 10/23/2026, 12:01:12 AM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview: US 9,010,578 B2
- Title: Discharge arrangement having a connecting device between a multi-component cartridge and an accessory part
- Inventor: Wilhelm A. Keller
- Original assignee: Medix Systems AG
- Application number: US 13/500,363
- Filing date: 2010-06-29
- Priority date: 2009-10-06 (flagged in the source as an assumption)
- Grant/publication date: 2015-04-21
- Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9010578/en
Purpose. The excerpt states that the invention "relates to a discharge arrangement comprising a cartridge or syringe for at least two components and comprising an accessory part, with one connecting component of a connecting device being arranged on the syringe or cartridge and another on the accessory part." In plain terms, it concerns the joint that links a multi-component cartridge or syringe to an attachment such as a mixer or closure cap.
Plain-language scope (limited to the excerpt). The supplied text does not include the claims or the detailed description, so the actual scope must be taken from the claims at the source. In the background discussion provided, the patent frames a bayonet-style connecting device (citing U.S. Pat. No. 5,033,650 A1), and notes earlier designs using differently sized outlets and corresponding inlets, a threaded cartridge with a union nut, coding ridges and indents for fit prevention, and a closure cap with stoppers. The excerpt does not describe the applicant's specific improvement beyond indicating that connection between cartridge and accessory is the subject matter.
What the excerpt does not establish.
- The language or number of the claims, and therefore the precise scope and any limitations. The classification listing (e.g., B05C17/00509, bayonet-type outlet connections) describes classification, not claim scope.
- The specific components of the connecting device as claimed, or how they differ from the cited prior art.
- Whether any statements in the background were adopted or distinguished during prosecution.
- Bibliographic details beyond those listed: the excerpt notes assignee "Medix Systems AG," lists later assignees, and shows a "2030-10-14" adjusted expiration and litigation/PTAB entries, but the operating rules exclude research into ownership transfers or litigation. These entries are not evaluated here and are recorded only as they appear in the source.
Full text and claims: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9010578/en
Generated 10/23/2026, 12:10:49 AM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9010578. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.