Invalidity dossier

US 8065680

Data gateway for jobs management based on a persistent job table and a server table

Current assignee: Starboard Value Intermediate Fund Lp As Collateral Agent

Added 9/24/2026, 1:32:31 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 8,065,680 B2

Title: Data gateway for jobs management based on a persistent job table and a server table

Patent number / application: US 8,065,680 B2; Application US 11/280,746

Dates: Filed 2005-11-15; priority date 2005-11-15; published as US 2007/0109592 A1 on 2007-05-17; granted 2011-11-22. Legal status listed as "Expired - Fee Related," with adjusted expiration 2030-08-15 (the source notes legal status is an assumption, not a legal conclusion).

Assignee / inventors: Inventors Bhaskar A. Parvathaneni, Lie Yang, Meher Tendjoukian, and Venkatachary Srinivasan. Original assignee Yahoo Inc; current assignees listed as Starboard Value Intermediate Fund LP as Collateral Agent and Altaba Inc.

Purpose: The patent addresses a data gateway for updating user data from multiple data sources. The source describes problems in conventional server-farm gateways: transferring job requests from a failed server without loss, scaling to a growing user base when persistent storage holds jobs at differing processing stages, and inefficiency when a user's job requests are spread across servers so account data must be cached in multiple places.

Plain-language scope: The gateway includes a server farm of multiple servers, with both a persistent job table (centrally storing jobs to be processed) and a server table (centrally storing server activity statuses) residing outside the servers, plus a job engine using both tables. A virtual Internet Protocol load balancer dynamically maps jobs to servers according to user identifiers. A method includes receiving a job request, fetching due jobs from the persistent job table, sending them to a storage queue, rescheduling them in the persistent job table for future processing, dispatching a job to a job handler, and processing it according to data source type. The excerpt also mentions figures covering server farms, the job engine, timer-driven scheduling, a job dispatcher, and a hierarchical job-locking scheme.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8065680/en

Not established by the excerpt: The full claims, claim language, detailed embodiments, and omitted description text; the excerpt is partial ("[Excerpt only; consult the source for omitted text.]"). It also does not establish litigation, validity, or prior-art analysis.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:31:20 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8065680. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.