Invalidity dossier

US 7913303

Method and system for dynamically protecting a computer system from attack

Current assignee: Alibaba Group Holding Ltd

Added 9/21/2026, 10:47:11 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US 7,913,303 B1

Title: Method and system for dynamically protecting a computer system from attack

Patent number: US 7,913,303 B1
Application number: US10/400,938
Filing date: 2003-03-27
Priority date (as listed): 2003-01-21
Publication/grant date: 2011-03-22
Inventor(s): Christopher Jay Rouland; Patrick Morton Becker; Christopher W. Klaus
Original assignee: International Business Machines Corp
Current assignee (per listing): Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
Status: Active; adjusted expiration listed as 2030-07-02

Purpose. The patent describes a "dynamic protection system" (DPS) that provides real-time protection for computer systems, networks, and hosts against attacks delivered over a distributed computer network such as the Internet. The excerpt identifies typical attacks as computer viruses, worms, and Trojan horses, and also references flooding attacks such as the "Smurf attack."

Plain-language scope. The DPS receives a data packet, determines whether to block that packet from passing into the system, network, or host, and if blocking is chosen, selects how to block it. Two blocking modes are described:

  • Passive blocking — typically at system and network levels; the DPS can send a reset packet to the intruder, the sender, or the recipient, informing the receiver that the connection has been severed.
  • Active blocking — typically at host and in-line networking levels; the DPS retrieves information about the intruder or receiving party (such as a network address, internet protocol port, protocol code, or protocol type), adds it to a blocking instruction, and applies that instruction to the data.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7913303/en

What the excerpt does not establish. The supplied text is explicitly an excerpt with omitted portions. It does not provide the full claims, the complete detailed description, the drawings, the full list of cited prior-art references, or the precise legal scope of any claim. Legal status, ownership changes, validity, and prior-art comparisons are not established here and were not researched.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:01:05 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7913303. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.