Invalidity dossier
US 7895641
Method and system for dynamic network intrusion monitoring, detection and response
Current assignee: BT Americas Inc
Added 10/29/2026, 6:01:13 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview: US 7,895,641 B2
Title: Method and system for dynamic network intrusion monitoring, detection and response
Assignee (current, per listing): BT Americas Inc; original assignee BT Counterpane Internet Security Inc. (I do not characterize transfers.)
Key dates: Priority 2000-03-16; application US11/551,606 filed 2006-10-20; published as US20070162973A1 on 2007-07-12; granted 2011-02-22; listed legal status "Expired – Lifetime," adjusted expiration 2023-06-11 (status as listed, not a legal conclusion).
Inventors: Bruce Schneier, Andrew H. Gross, Jonathan D. Callas.
Purpose: The excerpt frames the invention as a supplement to, not replacement for, a customer's preventive security products (firewalls, servers, routers, intrusion detection systems). Such products "can generate millions of lines of audit information each day," within which "may be the footprints of ongoing network attacks or intrusions." The system helps filter and analyze that audit information in effectively real time, using human intelligence and trained personnel, to detect and respond to breaches.
Plain-language scope (per the excerpt): The disclosed methods and systems support a managed security monitoring ("MSM") service in which a probe or "sentry" system monitors customer network activity, collects status data from monitored components, filters/analyzes the data for possible security concerns, and alerts trained security analysts at secure operations centers ("SOCs"), who then guide the customer through an appropriate response with follow-up as needed. Analysts draw on security intelligence databases covering product characteristics, known vulnerabilities, hacker tools, and effective/ineffective responses; these databases can be continually updated. The service may be customized dynamically or off-line to reflect network-specific needs and real-world response feedback. Data filtering and analysis can include "cross-product analysis," correlating multiple sensor readings as reflecting the same event. SOCs connect to customer networks preferably through cryptographically secured tunnels ("pipes"/"pathways"), with no other interconnection and physical hardening; multiple geographically separated SOCs may be used. Security analysts would preferably pass background checks and be bonded.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7895641/en
What the excerpt does not establish: The full claim language and claim scope; the detailed components of the probe/sentry system; the specific filtering, escalation, and response procedures; the remaining listed components of the "exemplary implementation"; and the text of the background section. This overview relies solely on the supplied excerpt.
Generated 10/29/2026, 6:01:19 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7895641. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.