Invalidity dossier

US 7120931

System and method for generating filters based on analyzed flow data

Current assignee: Cisco Technology Inc

Added 9/21/2026, 9:35:40 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US7120931B1

Title: System and method for generating filters based on analyzed flow data

Patent number / application: US7120931B1; Application US09/652,454

Inventor: David Cheriton

Assignee: Cisco Technology Inc (original assignee; listed current assignee Cisco Technology Inc)

Key dates (as listed): Priority/filing date 2000-08-31; publication (grant) date 2006-10-10; adjusted expiration 2022-07-26; status "Expired - Fee Related."

Purpose. The patent addresses filtering data in high-speed computer networks, specifically the generation and refinement of filters. According to the excerpt, high-speed networks make it difficult to examine every packet or monitor every data stream without extensive hardware support, and aggregate traffic monitoring can hide offending traffic within the aggregate ("The offending or suspicious data is therefore hidden in the aggregate"). A high-rate attack or failure may also originate upstream of the affected device, compromising the link even if the device can filter the traffic.

Plain-language scope. The disclosed method generally comprises separating data into different network flows, analyzing at least one flow, detecting potentially harmful flows, and generating a filter to prevent packets corresponding to detected harmful flows from passing through the network device. A related method for propagating filters comprises generating a filter at a first network device, sending filter information to a second, upstream network device, and requesting installation of the filter there. The system uses a combination of aggregate filters and a mechanism such as a "netflow directory" of microflows to progressively refine aggregate filters and identify detailed packet characteristics involved in an attack or failure. The excerpt also mentions a computer program product and a system comprising a netflow device, a flow analyzer, and a filter generator, plus an inter-router filter propagation protocol (FPP). Classifications listed: H04L63/00, H04L63/02, H04L63/0227.

Not established by the excerpt. The excerpt is incomplete and does not provide the full claims, detailed description, or drawing contents; it does not establish claim scope, claim count, examination history, validity, ownership transfers, or any prior-art comparison.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US7120931](/patent/US7120931)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:02:05 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7120931. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.