Invalidity dossier

US 7110399

System and method for redirecting network addresses for deferred rendering

Current assignee: International Business Machines Corp

Added 9/21/2026, 10:32:24 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US7110399B2

Title: System and method for redirecting network addresses for deferred rendering

Patent number: US7110399B2 (application US10/112,486; publication US20030185197A1)

Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation (original assignee)

Inventors: Dwip N. Banerjee; Lilian Sylvia Fernandes; Vasu Vallabhaneni

Dates: Priority/filing date 2002-03-28; publication 2003-10-02; granted 2006-09-19; adjusted expiration 2025-01-14. Status listed as "Expired – Fee Related."

Purpose: Mobile devices have small screens and limited display lines, so a web page may be hard or impossible to comprehend on a phone or PDA. A user who finds an interesting page may want to revisit it later in an environment with better rendering (e.g., a computer monitor), but may forget the address. The invention addresses this by forwarding the address (URL) for later viewing.

Plain-language scope (per the excerpt): A WAP-enabled mobile device runs URL redirection software. The user selects a target redirect address from a pre-defined list on the device (or adds one), may enter descriptive text (e.g., "Dallas sights" for a cryptic URL), and may select multiple redirect addresses for one URL. The user may also assign a priority (e.g., "high" or "normal") to individual redirect requests. The device sends a redirect request containing one or more redirect entries over a wireless network to a WAP gateway, which notifies a redirect manager—software on the gateway that manages redirection of URL locations received from wireless devices. The redirect manager analyzes each entry's priority and sends the redirect message accordingly; a "high" priority is handled differently from other priorities.

Classifications: H04L61/00, H04L67/00-series (including 67/04, 67/563), H04L9/40, H04L69/00-series.

What the excerpt does not establish: The claims are not included in the supplied text, so the precise legal scope is not established here. The excerpt cuts off mid-sentence ("sends the redirect messag…"), so how non-high priorities are processed, and the full described method steps, are not shown. No information on litigation or validity is provided or assessed.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US7110399](/patent/US7110399)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:01:29 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7110399. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.