Invalidity dossier

US 6975877

System and method for synchronizing clock dividers in a wireless network

Current assignee: Cisco Technology Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 2:16:41 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 6975877 B1

Title: System and method for synchronizing clock dividers in a wireless network
Patent number: US 6975877 B1
Application number: US09/982,591
Inventors: Alex Dergun; Ian Sayers
Assignee: Cisco Technology, Inc. (original and current assignee listed)
Priority/filing date: 2001-10-17
Grant/publication date: 2005-12-13
Status listed: Expired – Fee Related, adjusted expiration 2023-12-03
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6975877/en

Purpose. In wireless networks, base stations must stay synchronized so handoffs between cells are not discernable to mobile stations. GPS receivers can supply a timing reference, but GPS reception is not always possible—especially indoors or in private wireless systems—and GPS receivers are cost-prohibitive for low-traffic private networks. The patent therefore addresses synchronizing base stations down to internal frame and burst clock signals without relying on external sources.

Plain-language scope. A wireless network's base stations are partitioned into partially overlapping clusters (e.g., cluster A and cluster B). Each base station has a local clock unit with a clock divider that derives local clock signals (frame and burst clocks) from a received master clock signal, and the divider can reset itself upon receiving a sync pulse. A base station that belongs to two adjacent clusters propagates the sync pulse from one cluster to the next, extending propagation until all base stations receive it. Because the sync pulse travels over the same radio interface used for mobile communications, propagation is contemplated at low-usage hours (late night/early morning) and on a once-per-day basis, though on-demand or other periodicities are contemplated. The description states this can synchronize frame and burst clocks to within 70 nanoseconds, well inside a desired 900-nanosecond error threshold.

What the excerpt does not establish. It does not include the full claims, detailed figures, or the complete description; does not detail the referenced copending application Ser. No. 09/310,566; and does not state litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or prior-art conclusions. Legal status is an assumption, not a legal conclusion.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:52:24 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6975877. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.