Invalidity dossier

US 6590889

Data communications system and hybrid time-code multiplexing method

Current assignee: Merrill Lynch Capital Corp

Added 9/23/2026, 11:44:24 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 6,590,889 B1

Title: "Data communications system and hybrid time-code multiplexing method"

Patent number / application: US 6,590,889 B1; application US 09/261,971, filed 1999-03-03; granted/publication date 2003-07-08. Priority claimed from US 08/909,266, prior art date 1997-08-11 (which corresponds to patent US 6,104,708 A). Inventors: Robert David Preuss and Marcos Antonio Bergamo.

Assignee information (as listed): Original assignee Genuity Inc.; current assignee listed as Merrill Lynch Capital Corp and RTX BBN Technologies Corp. Status listed as "Expired – Lifetime," with anticipated expiration 2017-08-11.

Purpose and plain-language scope: The patent concerns digital data communications and, more particularly, systems and methods for accommodating terminals of different throughput capabilities. In described embodiments, terminals 21–26 communicate through a HUB 31 that may be a relay satellite or a terrestrial radio-frequency antenna; terminals may be satellite or RF terminals and may be in a mobile packet radio or other wireless/wireline network with shared channels.

The disclosed approach uses Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS) in a particular way to allow flexible allocation of channel capability or bandwidth. Broadly, the invention comprises a method for communicating over a network of nodes: generating multiple codes, each orthogonal to and a circular shifted version of every other code; assigning a subset of those codes to a first node; and transmitting information from that node to a second node using the assigned subset. It also comprises a node having means for storing such a code subset and means for transmitting using it, methods for modulating end-user information into symbols each carrying multiple bits, and systems/methods using circulant-unitary matrices. The excerpt references figures covering containers, code assignments and guard bands, M-sequence subtraction to form ternary sequences, circulating padding, frequency conversion, and correlators, but does not reproduce their full text.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6590889/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It provides only partial description text and definitions; figures and omitted passages are not reproduced. It does not establish claim language in full, detailed embodiments, experimental results, or the accuracy of the listed assignees and legal status, which the source itself characterizes as assumptions not legal conclusions.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:53:54 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6590889. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.