Invalidity dossier
US 6405318
Intrusion detection system
Current assignee: Cisco Technology Inc
Added 9/20/2026, 6:13:51 AM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
US 6,405,318 B1 — Intrusion Detection System: Overview
Title: Intrusion Detection System
Patent number: US 6,405,318 B1
Inventor: Craig H. Rowland
Original assignee: Psionic Software Inc. (current assignee listed as Cisco Technology Inc./Cisco Systems Inc.; the source notes assignee listings may be inaccurate)
Application number: US09/268,084
Priority/filing date: 1999-03-12
Publication (grant) date: 2002-06-11
Legal status: Expired – Lifetime; anticipated expiration 2019-03-12
Purpose. The patent relates generally to intrusion detection for a computer system — a computer-implemented system and method that monitors a computer system for activity indicative of attempted or actual access by unauthorized persons or computers. The stated aim is a real-time system that automatically builds user profile data (a "signature") for each user, or class of users, to reduce false alarms, detect suspicious actions, determine their source, and institute autonomous responses without waiting for human intervention.
Plain-language scope. As described in the excerpt, the system comprises a log audit function, a login anomaly detection function, a logout anomaly detection function, a session monitor function, and a port scan detector function, all interfacing with a local controller function and all operating in real-time. Each detection function notifies the controller and sends information about detected activity for further processing. User profile data is saved and updated on each logon and logoff; automatic actions (e.g., logging events, disabling user accounts, blocking access) can be pre-specified by the system administrator. The system also coordinates information transfer within host, multi-host and network environments. The source lists figures covering the host-based configuration (FIG. 1), log file auditing (FIG. 2), login/logout anomaly detection (FIGS. 3, 5A–5B), profile database updates (FIG. 4), port scanning (FIG. 6), session monitoring (FIG. 7), the controller (FIG. 8), and an alternate embodiment with a central system controller (FIG. 9).
Not established by this excerpt. The supplied text does not include the claims, the detailed description's full content, references cited, or prosecution history; specific claim limitations, prior-art relationships, and the accuracy of the assignee listing therefore cannot be confirmed from it.
Generated 10/1/2026, 10:02:40 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6405318. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.