Invalidity dossier

US 6282575

Added 9/23/2026, 7:21:30 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 6282575 B1

Title: Routing mechanism for networks with separate upstream and downstream traffic

Patent number / application: US 6282575 B1; Application US08/999,679

Assignee: Intel Corp (original assignee); assignment recorded 1998-05-22 to Intel Corporation. Inventors: Chihuan Michael Lin and John R. Mitkowski.

Key dates: Priority/filing date 1997-12-11; granted and published 2001-08-28; anticipated expiration 2017-12-11. Legal status listed as "Expired – Lifetime."

Purpose: The patent addresses networks in which upstream and downstream traffic travel over different transmission mediums — specifically, one-way cable systems. Downstream data (headend server to client) arrives via a "one-way" cable modem, while upstream data (client to headend server) is sent over the public telephone network through a PSTN modem or ISDN device to a POTS server. In prior approaches, each new client had to be added manually to a network router's routing tables using fixed IP addresses, burdening administrators and wasting IP addresses. The invention aims to automatically set up network traffic routing in such networks while permitting dynamic allocation of IP addresses, so that only one IP address is needed per client and addresses can be conserved.

Plain-language scope: Per the supplied text, the system includes a network access server, an authentication server coupled to it, and a routing manager coupled to both, each with respective port addresses. The routing manager is configured to: (1) receive, on its port address, a set of accounting request packets from the network access server port address; (2) parse the accounting request packet to derive a command flag; (3) forward the accounting request packets to the authentication server port address; and (4) generate a set of routing table modification commands for a network router based on the command flag. The corresponding method recites these steps for automatically setting up a session over separate upstream and downstream channels.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6282575/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full claims, complete specification, or drawings detail; does not establish validity, enforceability, or the scope of any specific claim; and does not identify prior art or litigation. Some text appears garbled (e.g., "Engineemrs"), so exact wording should be confirmed against the source.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:42:08 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6282575. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.