Invalidity dossier

US 5898784

Transferring encrypted packets over a public network

Current assignee: Gen Digital Inc

Added 9/21/2026, 10:42:23 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-v4-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US5898784A — "Transferring encrypted packets over a public network"

Bibliographic data (as supplied): Application US08/963,512; filed 1997-11-03; granted/publication date 1999-04-27; priority date 1996-01-16; original assignee Raptor Systems Inc.; inventors Alan J. Kirby, Jeffrey A. Kraemer, and Ashok P. Nadkarni. Legal status listed as "Expired – Lifetime," with anticipated expiration 2016-01-16. Classifications include H04L63/02 (firewalls), H04L63/0272 (virtual private networks), H04L63/0807 (authentication using tickets, e.g., Kerberos), H04L9/40 (network security protocols), and H04L2212/00 (encapsulation of packets).

Purpose: The patent relates to transferring encrypted packets over a public network. While data travels on a network, transmitted data—including source and destination addresses—is accessible to others monitoring the network, so data is often encrypted before being sent. Firewall computers with direct network access may prevent unauthorized access to internal/private networks. Encrypting/decrypting had been done by complex security software within applications or within the network protocol stack; this invention addresses handling such packets differently.

Plain-language scope (per the excerpted description): Encrypted network packets are received from the network at a network interface computer (which may be a firewall computer, with the network being a public network) and passed to a computer on an internal network. Determining the destination may include checking whether the source computer is authorized to send encrypted packets to the destination, and examining a header field that may correspond to a virtual network tunnel. Packets may be decrypted at the network interface computer, or passed through encrypted to the internal computer. A field in each packet may be examined to determine which of several encryption algorithms was used, and packets are decrypted accordingly. Packets may also be routed to a destination based on the determined virtual tunnel. The described approach supports "virtual private networking" (VPN), hiding internal addresses and topology.

What the excerpt does not establish: The supplied text does not include the full claims, the detailed description, drawings, or prior-art references. It does not establish claim scope, validity, infringement, ownership transfers, or litigation; such matters were excluded from this overview.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US5898784](/patent/US5898784)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:01:14 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5898784. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.