Invalidity dossier

US 5554982

Wireless train proximity alert system

Current assignee: Raytheon Co

Added 9/23/2026, 11:00:47 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US5554982A

Title: Wireless train proximity alert system

Patent number: US5554982A | Application: US08/283,460 | Inventors: Keith L. Shirkey, Bruce A. Casella

Assignee: Original assignee Hughes Aircraft Co; current assignee listed as Raytheon Co (as listed by the source; not a legal conclusion).

Dates: Filed 1994-08-01; priority date 1994-08-01; granted/published 1996-09-10. Anticipated expiration 2014-08-01; status "Expired – Fee Related."

Purpose: To provide a wireless train crossing warning system that accurately estimates a train's time to arrival, controls the size of the warning zone, warns individual drivers in time, deactivates the warning zone after the train passes, provides a vehicle identification code, and includes a backup system. It aims to reduce false alarms that could cause drivers to ignore true warnings, and to allow verification/tracking of events (including confirmed reception of a warning).

Plain-language scope: A train (or trackside) transmission device sends a train proximity signal, preferably including the train's speed and position. A crossing-based transceiver receives it and transmits warning-zone boundary coordinates when the train's estimated time-to-arrival is within a predetermined range. A vehicle-based receiver uses GPS to determine the vehicle's position and speed and produces an alarm when the vehicle is inside the warning zone and within a distance-to-crossing range that depends on vehicle speed. The warning zone inhibits alarm activation until the vehicle is inside it, reducing false alarms. Embodiments include train-mounted or trackside transmitters, a crossing "Warning and Verification System" with handshake signal, TDD sensors (preferably short-range doppler radar or optical) to deactivate the zone after the train passes, and vehicle alarms such as a blinking light and beeper. Classifications include B61L29/24, B61L29/246, G08G1/16, and B61L2205/04 (GPS).

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US5554982](/patent/US5554982)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not establish claim wording, the full specification, exact numbers/figures, or the omitted description text. It does not establish litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or prior-art conclusions.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:33:00 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5554982. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.