Invalidity dossier
US 5475539
Image data recording system including memory card
Current assignee: Casio Computer Co Ltd
Added 9/23/2026, 12:56:25 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview: US5475539A — "Image data recording system including memory card"
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US5475539](/patent/US5475539)/en
Bibliographic data (as listed): Assignee — Casio Computer Co Ltd. Inventor — Masaharu Orii. Priority date — 1987-04-30 (claimed from JP62107651A). Filing date — 1994-06-07 (application US08/255,121). Publication/grant — 1995-12-12. Legal status listed as "Ceased"; anticipated expiration 2012-12-12. Classification includes H04N1/2158 (intermediate information storage for one or a few pictures using a detachable storage unit) and H04N1/2112 (using still video cameras).
Purpose: The patent addresses drawbacks of prior electronic still cameras — magnetic-disk types recording analog FM signals, and semiconductor-memory types requiring more than 2 M bits per still image (over 100 M bits for 50 images), which the text says is not practically available. The stated object is a still image recording system with a compact camera body that can store a relatively large quantity of still images in a detachable memory unit.
Plain-language scope: Per the described invention, the system comprises: a housing; optical means forming an optical image on a plane in the housing; image data processing means producing digital electronic image data from that image; memory means (e.g., a memory card with at least one semiconductor memory chip) detachably mounted to the housing and electrically coupled to the processing means for storing the digital image data; output terminal means in the housing for outputting that data; and control means controlling writing to, and reading from, the detachable memory means. A peripheral memory means outside the housing may be detachably coupled to the output terminal means, and a display means may be coupled to the output terminal means or peripheral memory means. The detachable memory may be re-used or erased. The excerpt summarizes FIG. 1–11 subject matter, including a camera apparatus, video tape recorder, and recording formats.
What the excerpt does not establish: It contains no claim text, so specific claim scope cannot be quoted. It omits details of the memory-card interface, the second embodiment, figures, and the full description. It provides no findings on validity, litigation, ownership transfers, or prior art, and the listed legal status and assignee are expressly stated not to be legal conclusions or warranties.
(Word count: ~300)
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:53:22 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5475539. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.