Invalidity dossier

US 5463623

Integrated wireless telecommunication and local area network system

Current assignee: Avaya Inc

Added 9/17/2026, 2:32:45 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 5,463,623 A

Title: Integrated wireless telecommunication and local area network system

Patent number / application: US 5,463,623 A (application US07/738,415)

Inventors: Gary J. Grimes; Thomas M. Quinn

Original assignee: AT&T IPM Corp; the source also lists current assignees Avaya Inc. and AT&T Inc. (as listed, without verification).

Key dates (as listed): Priority/filing 1991-07-31; granted/publication 1995-10-31; anticipated expiration 2012-10-31. Legal status shown: Expired – Lifetime.

Purpose (from the text): Prior wireless telecommunication arrangements suffered from insufficient communication spectrum for the telecommunication equipment in a business site with many private and group offices, and prior LAN and telecommunication systems were separate. Separate systems also required large amounts of cabling that were expensive to install and change and unsightly in offices. The invention addresses these problems by simultaneously providing high-speed wireless LAN capability and wireless ISDN capability within a group or private office.

Plain-language scope (from the text): The apparatus comprises a cell controller in each office, an ISDN interface in each telecommunication unit, and a LAN interface in each LAN unit. These interfaces communicate by time-division multiplexing using a framing technique on a wireless (radio frequency or photonic) medium. Each frame is divided into time slots for ISDN protocol data, with the remainder reserved for LAN protocol data; each ISDN channel uses two time slots (one receive, one transmit). The LAN interfaces use only a portion of each frame for signaling and data transfer under a LAN protocol (e.g., CSMA/CD similar to Ethernet, or token ring). The cell controller interconnects telecommunication units to a telecommunication switching system (PBX or public telephone network) using ISDN protocol, determines which LAN units communicate with that system, and converts between LAN and ISDN protocol data. Reuse of radio frequency or photonic bandwidth is enabled by the small areas each apparatus serves. Figure 1 shows the system; Fig. 2 the cell controller; Fig. 3 a computer or telecommunication unit; Fig. 4 a wireless frame. ISDN termination 101 is described as an ISDN basic rate interface (BRI) linking the cell controller to telecommunication system 130.

Not established by this excerpt: the full claims, dependent-claim scope, embodiments beyond those summarized, other prior-art references, and any further text omitted from the excerpt.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5463623/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:03:06 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5463623. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.