Invalidity dossier

US 4441500

EKG Electrode

Current assignee: Ferris Pharmaceuticals Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 4:31:51 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

US 4,441,500 — EKG Electrode: Overview

Title: EKG Electrode
Patent number: US 4,441,500 A
Inventors: Robert W. Sessions, Jerome Jeslis, Richard A. Rodzen
Original assignee: Ferris Manufacturing Co. (current assignee listed: Ferris Pharmaceuticals Inc)
Priority date: 1980-04-17 (claimed from application US06/141,057, patent US4353373A)
Filing date: 1981-03-25 (application US06/247,560)
Publication/grant date: 1984-04-10
Legal status: Expired – Lifetime (anticipated expiration 2001-04-10)

Purpose. The patent addresses two problems in prior EKG electrodes: short shelf life (moisture escaping from the jel-impregnated foam because the seal near the electrical contact was inadequate) and the limited number of circular electrodes that could be used at once on a person with a small chest.

Plain-language scope. The disclosure covers an electrode and its packaging. In one form, a rectangular adhesive foam pad carries a jel-impregnated circular foam disk, with a metal electrical connector passing through the pad. The pad's adhesive side sticks to a thin plastic (polyethylene, or MYLAR which is preferred for moisture retention) base liner having a hole through which the jelled disk extends; a plastic cap (polyethylene or MYLAR) is sealed over the disk to extend shelf life from weeks to months. Two parallel strips of electrodes may be packaged on one base layer, which can be folded in half for compact storage. A method is described: starting from a multi-layer preform with a holed polyethylene sheet, adhering rectangular foam pads centered on the holes, temporarily attaching a holed protective liner, punching a hole through each pad, applying a metal snap electrode, adding and jel-impregnating a foam disk, removing the liner, and sealing a plastic cap over each disk. A second aspect describes a circular electrode with a woven or spun plastic fabric lower layer removably adhered to a circular polystyrene base liner, a two-part eyelet and stud electrode, and a release liner.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4441500/en

Not established by this excerpt: the full claim language and exact claim scope; the complete specification and drawings (FIGS. 1–15 are only described, not shown); any litigation, ownership transfers beyond the assignment entries listed, validity, or prior-art analysis beyond the two patents mentioned (US 3,805,769 and US 4,034,854).

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:44:23 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 4441500. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.