Invalidity dossier

US 3949072

Topical composition for treatment of seborrheic keratosis

Current assignee: Individual

Added 9/23/2026, 1:05:28 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 3,949,072 A

Title: Topical composition for treatment of seborrheic keratosis

Inventor / Assignee: Louis T. Tenta (inventor); original assignee listed as "Individual."

Key dates: Priority date 1971-03-11 (claimed from application US00123380A, which issued as US 3,821,370); filing date 1974-05-01; granted/publication date 1976-04-06; anticipated expiration 1993-04-06. Legal status listed as "Expired - Lifetime." The application is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 123,380, filed Mar. 11, 1971, now U.S. Pat. No. 3,821,370.

Purpose: To improve the external appearance caused by seborrheic keratosis by providing a superficial slough (peeling) of the epidermis, applied topically in non-surgical fashion without harm to health.

Plain-language scope: The claimed composition has five essential ingredients:

  • An "inhibited phenol" — potassium phenate, sodium phenate, or ammonium phenate — at 5–25 parts by weight, calculated as potassium phenate (approximately 70% of which is equivalent phenol). A preferred range is 10–20 parts, most preferably about 18–19 parts.
  • A salicylate (sodium salicylate or zinc salicylate) at ½–2 parts.
  • Resorcinol at 1–5 parts.
  • A zinc compound (e.g., zinc oxide, zinc sulfate, zinc salicylate) at 1–4 parts, calculated as zinc sulfate.
  • A non-aqueous solvent system including a hydrophilic, non-toxic lower aliphatic alcohol (2–4 carbon atoms), to bring the total to 100 parts. Preferred solvent systems: ~61.5% benzyl alcohol / 38.5% ethanol, or 50% propylene glycol / 50% ethanol.

The inhibited phenol is activated by moisture from air or skin. The composition may be a solution or a gel, using hydroxyethylcellulose (preferred) or carboxymethyl cellulose at about 5–15% by weight. A solution containing 1 gram of potassium phenate reportedly treats roughly 200 cm² of skin. The specification states these formulations are more stable and clinically active at lower active-ingredient concentrations than prior systems.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US3949072/en

What the excerpt does not establish: The supplied source contains no claims text (only classification, abstract, and description excerpts), no examples 1–6 formulations in full, no clinical trial data, no efficacy or safety conclusions, and no information on litigation, ownership transfers, or validity. The abstract and description describe the composition, but the excerpt does not establish the exact scope of the granted claims.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:53:17 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 3949072. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.