Invalidity dossier

US 3761703

Apparatus for illumination of instrument faces

Current assignee: U S Radium Corp

Added 9/23/2026, 3:08:34 PM

IndustryLighting (L)
At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on fileLighting (L)

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

I'll verify the patent details against available sources before summarizing.

Search verification note

I searched for US 3,761,703 specifically. The results confirm the bibliographic record below (Google Patents and uspto.report both return the same document). Two caveats on identifiers, per your strict-interpretation rule:

  • Search hits also surfaced unrelated documents containing the string "3761703" as part of a different identifier — e.g. "DE 3761703 T" (a German publication number) and an "EP … (11) 3761703" European validation number. These are not US 3,761,703 and I have not treated them as such.
  • No CAFC 2026 docket entry for US 3,761,703 appeared in the results. That is expected: per the Google Patents legal-status field, this patent is "Expired – Lifetime," with an anticipated expiration date of 1990-09-25.

Bibliographic data (US 3,761,703)

Field Value
Patent number US 3,761,703 A
Application number US 211,344 (US00211344A)
Title Apparatus for illumination of instrument faces
Inventors Willard Mund (Morristown, NJ); Wolfgang Fuhr (North Haledon, NJ)
Assignee U. S. Radium Corporation, Morristown, NJ
Filing date December 23, 1971
Issue date September 25, 1973
Classification US Cl. 240/2.1, 240/1 EL; Int. Cl. G01d 11/28; CPC G01D 11/28
Claims 5 (2 independent — claims 1 and 5)
Primary Examiner / Attorney Fred L. Braun / Dean S. Edmonds et al.
Legal status Expired – Lifetime (anticipated expiration 1990-09-25)

Prior art cited: US 3,154,251 (Airmark Plastics Corp., "Panel light"); US 3,610,914 (Dana J. Blackwell, "Illuminated indicating instrument with front replaceable lamps"); US 3,638,009 (Ackerman Engravers Inc., "Miniature lighting device"); US 3,639,745 (Omron Tateisi Electronics Co., "Mounting arrangement for electrical device").


Abstract (as printed)

"A lamp cartridge for insertion in the edge of a light conductive block for distributing light to an instrument or instrument panel. The cartridge includes spring clip contacts along opposite sides thereof for making resiliently biased contact with bus bars in the light block, guides for orienting the clips in relation to an opening in the light block for receiving the cartridge, and an exposed portion facilitating manual insertion or withdrawal of the cartridge with respect to the opening."


Plain-language overview of the independent claims

Claim 1 — Plug-in lamp cartridge with self-camming spring contacts

A lighting system for an instrument face made of four cooperating parts:

  1. A transparent light block mounted directly behind the dial — edge-lit, so light injected at one edge propagates through the block and escapes only at the dial indicia.
  2. A lamp-receiving recess formed into the block.
  3. Two spaced bus conductors (bus bars) carried by the block, with portions left exposed so they run across the recess.
  4. A removable lamp assembly that slides into the recess, consisting of a lamp holder, an electric lamp carried by the holder, and exposed contact members on the outside of the holder wired to the lamp.

The inventive core is the last element: the contact members are resiliently mounted and have cam surfaces. Pushing the assembly linearly into the recess makes those cams ride over the exposed bus bars, so the same motion simultaneously (a) makes the electrical connection and (b) mechanically detains the assembly in place. In other words, no soldering, no separate fastener, and no tool are needed to install or energize the lamp — grip, push, and the spring force both powers and retains the cartridge.

Claim 5 — Same system, focused on the wiring/retention architecture of the cartridge

This independent claim covers the same four-part combination but recites the cartridge's internal construction in more detail:

  • The lamp holder has a forward end (inserted first) and a rearward end, with the lamp at the forward end.
  • A recess is formed in the rearward end of the holder.
  • Spring contacts sit on the outside of the holder, contact the exposed bus conductors, and have their ends bent into that rearward recess.
  • The lamp's wire leads also run into that rearward recess and are pressed against the spring-contact ends.
  • A cap closes the assembly: its first section is force-fitted into the rearward recess, clamping the leads against the contact ends so the electrical joints stay secure; its second section projects out of the light block and is shaped to be gripped by hand (the specification describes grasping it between thumb and forefinger, thumbnail in a groove) for tool-free insertion and withdrawal.

Net effect of claim 5: a single press-fit cap both seals the electrical terminations and provides the pull-handle, making the lamp (or the whole cartridge) field-replaceable without disturbing the instrument pointer, dial, or light block.

Dependent claims 2–4 (context for the independent claims)

  • Claim 2 adds the manually grippable cap feature (projecting section) to claim 1.
  • Claim 3 adds the orientation features: cylindrical recess, a longitudinal groove in the recess wall, and a spline on the lamp holder that mates with it — aligning the spring contacts with the bus bars and preventing rotation from vibration.
  • Claim 4 defines the contact geometry: a first section diverging outwardly (front-to-back), a second section converging inwardly, and a rounded end section, with the bus bar riding along these sections into a seated position at the juncture of the second and rounded sections.

Uncertainty / caveats

  • The Google Patents page renders a "Claims (12)" heading, but the printed patent text and the claims body both show 5 claims; the "12" appears to be an artifact of how nested sub-paragraphs (1./2./3. and 1.–6.) were parsed. I am treating 5 claims as authoritative.
  • I could not independently open a live USPTO Patent Center or CAFC docket record in this session; the legal-status and docket conclusions above rest on the Google Patents record and the absence of any 2026 CAFC hit in search. Given the 1990 anticipated expiration, live enforcement litigation over this patent would be implausible.
  • As noted, unrelated documents sharing the "3761703" string exist; none were folded into this summary.

Generated 9/27/2026, 1:40:02 AM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 3761703. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring

Other patents in Lighting (L)

See all Lighting (L) patents →