Invalidity dossier

US 3371085

5-aryl-3h-1,4-benzodiazepin-2(1h)-ones

Current assignee: CURACAO PHARMHOLDING NV

Added 9/23/2026, 8:40:54 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 3,371,085

Title: 5-aryl-3H-1,4-benzodiazepin-2(1H)-ones

Patent number: US 3,371,085 A

Assignee/Applicant: F. Hoffmann La Roche AG (original assignee). Application filed by F. Hoffmann La Roche AG; inventors Earl Reeder and Leo Henryk Sternbach.

Key dates (as listed): Priority date 1959-12-10; filing date 1961-11-20; publication/grant date 1968-02-27; expired — lifetime. The source also lists later reassignments (1981, 1983) to Curacao Pharmholding N.V. and Roche Products Inc., and an anticipated expiration of 1985-02-27.

Purpose: The invention "relates to novel 5-aryl-3H-1,4-benzodiazepin-2(1H)-ones, novel derivatives thereof and novel intermediates therefor; and processes of making the foregoing."

Plain-language scope (per the excerpt): The claims-language portion describes compounds of a general formula and their pharmaceutically acceptable salts, where:

  • R is hydrogen, lower alkyl, lower alkenyl, lower alkynyl, aralkyl, or cyano-lower alkyl;
  • R (second) is hydrogen, lower alkyl, lower alkoxy-lower alkyl, phenyl, or hydroxybenzyl;
  • R, R, and R (ring substituents) are hydrogen, halogen, or lower alkyl;
  • R (another) is hydrogen, lower alkyl, lower alkenyl, or lower alkynyl.

The compounds include 4,5-dihydro derivatives. Basic compounds form pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salts with inorganic/organic acids (e.g., hydrochloric, sulfuric, tartaric, citric), and certain 4-position tertiary-amine compounds form quaternary ammonium salts with conventional quaternizing agents such as lower alkyl halides.

Processes described: Synthesis routes include reacting a 2-aminobenzophenone with hydroxylamine to form an oxime, acylation with an α-halo-lower alkanoyl halide in base, cyclization to a 5-phenyl-3H-1,4-benzodiazepin-2(1H)-one 4-oxide; reduction (phosphorus trichloride or hydrogen/Raney nickel); acid treatment of a 2-(N-methylacetamido) intermediate; reaction of a 2-aminobenzophenone with α-halo-lower alkanoyl halide followed by ammonia; and cyclization of 2-(aminoacetamido)benzophenones.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US3371085/en

What the excerpt does not establish: Full claim text, the complete specification, all examples, exact formula drawings (chemical structures rendered as text are incomplete), the full class definitions, and any legal conclusions about validity, infringement, or claim scope.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:41:16 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 3371085. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.