Invalidity dossier

US 12109938

System for communication of hazardous vehicle and road conditions

Current assignee: Emergency Safety Solutions Inc

Added 10/20/2026, 12:00:19 AM

At a glanceActive PTAB challengeNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 12109938 B2

Title: System for communication of hazardous vehicle and road conditions

Patent number / application: US 12109938 B2 (application US 16/991,595; pre-grant publication US 2021/0049909 A1)

Assignee: Emergency Safety Solutions Inc (current assignee as listed; original assignee ESS Help Inc)

Key dates: Priority date 2019-08-12; application filed 2020-08-12; granted/published 2024-10-08. Legal status listed as active, with an adjusted expiration of 2041-01-09 (stated as an assumption, not a legal conclusion).

Inventors: David M. Tucker, Stephen T. Powers, Mike Incorvaia, Austin Reece Tucker

Purpose: The patent is directed to communicating hazardous vehicle and road conditions. The title and classifications present it as an in-vehicle instrumentation/signaling system that notifies others of hazards or collision risk. Specifically, the abstracted classifications cover: vehicle instrumentation output to a user (visual output such as blinking lights or displays, head-up displays, acoustic output, and information handling/prioritization); vehicle lighting/signaling for giving flashing caution signals (hazard-type signals) and for automatically indicating collision risk between vehicles or with pedestrians based on vehicle sensor data; signaling for anti-collision purposes; and drive-control systems for predicting travel path or likelihood of collision responsive to traffic or environmental parameters.

Plain-language scope (based only on the supplied excerpt): The classification data indicates a system mounted in or interacting with a vehicle that detects or is informed of a hazardous condition (including collision risk), then communicates it — to the vehicle's own occupants through visual or audible alerts, and to surrounding traffic through caution/hazard light signaling — potentially with data exchanged via a vehicle/server arrangement. The prior-art keywords listed are "vehicle," "communication," "microprocessor," "hazard," and "server."

What the excerpt does not establish: The supplied text contains no claims, no abstract, no detailed description, and no drawings. It therefore does not establish the actual claim scope, the specific hardware architecture, how the server and microprocessor cooperate, or the precise hazard-detection and communication methods. The classification listings and keywords are indicative only and should not be read as a statement of claim coverage. No litigation, ownership-transfer merits, validity, or prior-art analysis is provided here.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US12109938/en

Generated 10/20/2026, 12:00:48 AM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 12109938. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (1)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

1 active
Pending
Filed
Oct 19, 2026
Last modified
Oct 19, 2026
Petitioner
HAAS, Inc.
Inventor
DAVID M. TUCKER et al

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.