- Filed
- Oct 2, 2026
- Last modified
- Oct 13, 2026
- Petitioner
- Shenzhen Lanhe Technologies Co., Ltd et al.
- Inventor
- Jeff Whitten et al
Invalidity dossier
US 11775019
Case and mount system for handheld electronic device
Current assignee: Rokform IP LLC
Added 10/3/2026, 12:00:11 PM
At a glanceActive PTAB challengeNo litigation on file
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
✓ Generated
Patent Overview: US11775019B2
Title: Case and mount system for handheld electronic device
Patent number: US11775019B2
Application number: US17/118,371
Current assignee (as listed): Rokform IP LLC (original assignee also Rokform IP LLC)
Inventors: Jeff Whitten, Bernhard Leitner, Craig Erion
Priority date (as listed): 2012-01-12
Filing date: 2020-12-10
Publication date: 2023-10-03
Adjusted expiration (as listed): 2032-09-01 (status: Active)
Purpose and plain-language scope
The patent concerns a case and mount system for a handheld electronic device—a protective case that can be attached to and released from a mount. Per the supplied prior-art keywords, the system involves a case, the electronic device, a slip feature, an interlocking feature, and a magnet. Classifications place it in device enclosures (G06F1/1656, A45C11/00), cycle-mounted accessories (B62J9/21), and mechanical fastening/supports—key-type connections (F16B3/00), quick-release heads (F16M11/041), roll-axis pivoting for landscape/portrait rotation (F16M11/105), and supports attaching to objects such as a cycle (F16M13/02). Together these indicate a removable case that interlocks and magnetically secures to a mount, permits rotation, and can attach to an object like a bicycle.
Notes on dates/status
The listed dates and legal status carry an express disclaimer in the source: they are assumptions, not legal conclusions or warranties.
What the excerpt does not establish
The provided text contains no claims, no detailed description, and no abstract, so the exact claimed scope, element relationships, and required combinations cannot be determined. The keyword list and classifications suggest, but do not prove, the recited features. The excerpt does not establish validity, enforceability, inventorship correctness, or the accuracy of assignee records.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US11775019](/patent/US11775019)/en
Generated 10/4/2026, 12:00:48 AM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 11775019. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.
Proceedings on file (1)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
1 active
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.