- Filed
- Oct 2, 2026
- Last modified
- Oct 2, 2026
- Petitioner
- Shenzhen Lanhe Technologies Co., Ltd et al.
- Inventor
- Jeff Whitten et al
Invalidity dossier
US 11775019
Added 10/3/2026, 12:00:11 PM
At a glanceActive PTAB challengeNo litigation on file
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-v4-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 11775019. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.
Proceedings on file (1)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
1 active
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.