Invalidity dossier

US 10110961

Methods and systems for supplementing media assets during fast-access playback operations

Current assignee: DirecTV, LLC

Added 8/27/2026, 6:49:34 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges1 lawsuit on fileasserted by DirecTV, LLC

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-v4-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US10110961B2

Title: Methods and systems for supplementing media assets during fast-access playback operations

Patent number / application: US10110961B2; application US15/415,052; publication US20170134814A1.

Inventor / assignee: Paul T. Stathacopoulos. Original assignee Rovi Guides, Inc.; current assignee listed as Adeia Guides Inc.

Key dates (as listed): Priority date 2014-02-26 (assumed); filing date 2017-01-25; publication 2018-10-23; granted 2018-10-23; anticipated expiration 2034-02-26. Status listed as Active. The listing notes a US case filed in the California Northern District Court (litigation), but this overview does not analyze it.

Purpose (plain-language scope): Based on the title and classification, the patent concerns supplementing media assets—that is, presenting supplemental content in connection with a media asset—during fast-access playback operations such as trick-play functions (e.g., fast-forward, rewind, skip) of recorded or on-demand content. It relates to client devices (e.g., set-top boxes), end-user interfaces for controlling playback functions, and synchronization/rendering of additional data (such as supplemental content or advertisements in a separate screen region) with the content stream.

Classification: H04N21/00 (selective content distribution), H04N21/472, H04N21/47217 (playback control interfaces using progress bars, mode or play-point indicators, or bookmarks), H04N21/4307, H04N21/43074 (synchronizing rendering of multiple streams or additional data), and H04N21/4316 (displaying supplemental content in a region of the screen, e.g., an advertisement in a separate window).

What the excerpt does not establish: The supplied source provides only bibliographic, classification, assignment, and status data with the abstract/claims text omitted. It does not state the specific claims, the exact mechanism for supplementing media assets, embodiments, figures, or the substantive scope of protection. Any description of operation is inferred from title and classification only.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US10110961](/patent/US10110961)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:03:37 PM

Cases on file (1)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10110961. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: DirecTV, LLC

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring