Invalidity dossier

US 8156528

Personal video recorder systems and methods

Current assignee: DirecTV, LLC

Added 8/27/2026, 6:49:33 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges1 lawsuit on fileasserted by DirecTV, LLC

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-v4-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US8156528B2

Title: Personal video recorder systems and methods
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US8156528](/patent/US8156528)/en

Bibliographic Data

  • Patent number: US8156528B2
  • Application number: US10/105,082
  • Inventors: Joseph P. Baumgartner; Kenneth F. Carpenter, Jr.; Michael D. Ellis; Danny R. Gaydou
  • Original assignee: United Video Properties Inc
  • Current assignee (per source): Adeia Guides Inc
  • Priority date: 2001-03-22
  • Filing date: 2002-03-21
  • Publication date: 2012-04-10
  • Legal status: Active; adjusted expiration 2028-07-23

Plain-Language Scope

The excerpt identifies this patent by title and prior-art keywords — "pvr," "video recorder," "personal video," "interactive television," and "program guide" — indicating the subject matter concerns personal video recorder (PVR) systems and related methods, with ties to interactive television and program guide functionality. Beyond the title and keyword list, the excerpt provides no claim text, no abstract, and no detailed description.

What the Excerpt Does Not Establish

The supplied text does not include:

  • Any claim language, so the actual legal scope of the invention is not established.
  • An abstract or written description summarizing the disclosed embodiments.
  • Any prior-art references or examiner citations.
  • The specific technical problems addressed or solutions claimed.

Statements about the patent's litigation history, ownership transfers, security interests, validity, or prior art are visible in the source listing but are outside the scope of this overview per instructions and are not analyzed here. The legal status is expressly described by the source as an assumption, not a legal conclusion. No facts beyond those reproduced above should be inferred. Consult the full patent document for the claims and specification.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:03:37 PM

Cases on file (1)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8156528. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: DirecTV, LLC

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring