- Filed
- Mar 24, 2026
- Last modified
- Apr 2, 2026
- Petitioner
- Altria Client Services LLC
- Inventor
- Jufen Zheng
Patent D1081032
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (1)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There is a single AIA trial proceeding on file for US patent D1081032, PGR2026-00035, which is currently in a pending status. This means the patent's validity is presently being challenged but no claims have been invalidated or sustained by the PTAB yet. From a defensive posture, the patent is currently vulnerable to this ongoing challenge.
PGR2026-00035 — Altria Client Services LLC v. [Patent Owner of D1081032]
- Type: Post-Grant Review
- Filed: 2026-03-24
- Status: Pending. The petition has been filed and a preliminary response may have been filed, but the Board has not yet decided whether to institute a trial.
- Judge panel: The judge panel has not been publicly assigned or disclosed in the available information, as the proceeding is in its early stages before institution.
- Petition grounds: The specific claims challenged, prior art cited, and statutory bases (§ 101 / § 102 / § 103 / § 112) for the petition are not publicly available in the provided search results. For a Post-Grant Review of a design patent, common grounds typically include obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 and anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102, and can also include indefiniteness under 35 U.S.C. § 112.
- Institution decision: Not yet issued. The PTAB has a statutory deadline of 6 months from the petition filing date to decide whether to institute the trial. Therefore, an institution decision for this PGR is expected by approximately 2026-09-24.
- Final Written Decision: Not yet issued, as the proceeding is in the pre-institution phase.
- Settlement / termination: Not yet applicable.
- Appeal: Not yet applicable.
- Defensive value: This proceeding indicates that the validity of patent D1081032 is being actively challenged. While no claims have been invalidated, the existence of a pending PGR means the patent's enforceability is currently uncertain. Defendants facing assertion of this patent should closely monitor the institution decision for PGR2026-00035.
Strategic summary
All claims of US Patent D1081032 are currently UNTESTED by the PTAB. There is one active Post-Grant Review, PGR2026-00035, challenging the patent. Since the proceeding is in the pre-institution phase, no claims have been canceled or sustained by a PTAB decision.
The estoppel landscape is not yet solidified for D1081032. If PGR2026-00035 is instituted and proceeds to a Final Written Decision, the petitioner (Altria Client Services LLC) and its privies would be estopped under 35 U.S.C. § 325(e)(2) from asserting in other proceedings any invalidity ground that they raised or reasonably could have raised during the PGR. However, at this early stage, these estoppel provisions are not yet in effect.
There is no pattern of multiple proceedings on this patent, nor is there information suggesting a defensive aggregator or aggressive appeal strategy by the patent owner at this time, as only a single, recently filed PGR is pending.
Recommended next steps
For a defendant currently facing assertion of US patent D1081032:
- Monitor PGR2026-00035 closely: The most crucial upcoming milestone is the institution decision, expected around September 24, 2026. A decision to institute trial would indicate the PTAB believes there is a reasonable likelihood that at least one claim is unpatentable, significantly impacting the patent's value. Conversely, a denial of institution would strengthen the patent's position against PTAB challenges on the grounds raised.
- Access public documents: Once the petition and subsequent filings become publicly available on the USPTO PTAB E2E system (e.g., via the PTAB Open Data Portal), review the petition to understand the specific grounds and prior art asserted by Altria Client Services LLC. This information is critical for evaluating the strength of the patent and any potential defenses.
- No PTAB activity to date has validated the claims: Since this is the first and only PTAB proceeding and it's still pending, no claims have been "hardened" by surviving an AIA trial. The patent remains susceptible to challenge.
Generated 6/15/2026, 12:45:42 AM