Invalidity dossier

US 9663810

Methods of cell culture

Current assignee: Janssen Biotech Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 8:10:02 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US9663810B2 — "Methods of Cell Culture"

Bibliographic data (as supplied): US Patent US9663810B2; application US14/941,984, filed 2015-11-16; granted/publication date 2017-05-30; priority date 2013-03-14; anticipated expiration 2033-03-14; legal status "Active." Inventor: Holly Prentice. Original assignee: Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; current assignee listed as Janssen Biotech Inc. The record also lists US20160068881A1 as an other version. Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US9663810](/patent/US9663810)/en

Purpose: The invention "relates generally to cell culture methods" for producing therapeutic polypeptides, particularly therapeutic antibodies. It addresses controlling the glycosylation profile of a recombinant protein by adding putrescine to culture medium.

Plain-language scope: The disclosed method produces a recombinant protein preparation having a target level of one or more "mature glycans." Steps recited: (a) provide a cell genetically engineered to express a recombinant protein; (b) culture it in medium comprising (e.g., supplemented with) putrescine, such that the cell expresses the protein; (c) harvest (purify/isolate from the cell and/or medium) a preparation of the protein; and (d) measure a level of one or more mature glycans, where the preparation has the target value. Putrescine is present "for a time and in an amount effective to modify (e.g., increase or decrease)" the mature glycans. Embodiments recite putrescine amounts ranging from about 0.01 mg/L to 40 mg/L or more, and ranges such as about 0.1–10 mg/L. The "target value" may be a level in a reference therapeutic product (a list of named products, e.g., infliximab, rituximab, trastuzumab, is provided), or a product specification/QC criterion, an FDA label, Physician's Insert, USP or EP monograph. One recited target: more than about 30% mature glycans (e.g., >40–95%) and/or less than about 90% high mannose, hybrid glycans, or their combination; the supplied excerpt is truncated at that point.

What the excerpt does not establish: It omits the full claims, complete specification, examples, figures, and any experimental data or working examples. It does not establish claim scope, allowability, enforcement, or the accuracy of the listed assignees, legal status, or dates. No findings on litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or prior art are made here.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:41:33 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9663810. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.