Invalidity dossier
US 9455274
Replacement fin process in SSOI wafer
Current assignee: International Business Machines Corp
Added 9/24/2026, 1:42:26 AM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview: US9455274B2
Title: Replacement fin process in SSOI wafer
Patent number: US9455274B2
Application number: US14/609,574 (published as US20160225789A1)
Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation (original and current assignee as listed)
Inventors: Bruce B. Doris, Hong He, Ali Khakifirooz, Junli Wang
Key dates: Priority date and filing date 2015-01-30; publication date 2016-09-27. Anticipated expiration listed as 2035-01-30. Legal status shown as "Expired - Fee Related" (a status assumption, not a legal conclusion).
Purpose: The patent relates to a replacement fin process performed in a strained silicon-on-insulator (SSOI) wafer. It addresses forming fins and strained layers in the fabrication of fin-based semiconductor devices.
Plain-language scope (from supplied text): The disclosure concerns fabricating replacement fins on an SSOI wafer. The prior-art keywords listed—"fins," "layer," "pFET," "strained," and "forming"—indicate the subject matter involves forming fin structures, strained layers, and both n-type and p-type FET regions on a common substrate. Classifications include fin field-effect transistors (FinFETs), SOI substrates, and integration of multiple device types (including CMOS and isolation regions) on the same substrate, consistent with a method for replacing fins in selected regions of an SSOI wafer.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US9455274](/patent/US9455274)/en
What the excerpt does not establish: The supplied excerpt contains no claims, no detailed description, no drawings, and no prior-art references. Therefore it does not establish the specific steps, materials, layer thicknesses, or exact claim scope of the invention; it also does not establish prosecution history, family members beyond those listed, or the substantive content of the related application US15/082,161 (US9917105B2). No findings on litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or prior art are made here.
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:31:11 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9455274. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.