Invalidity dossier

US 9414285

Handover with integrated antenna beam training in wireless networks

Current assignee: Qualcomm Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 5:01:27 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 9,414,285 B2

Title: Handover with integrated antenna beam training in wireless networks

Patent number: US 9,414,285 B2

Application number: US 14/320,322

Inventors: Karl Georg Hampel, Junyi Li, Vincent Douglas Park

Assignee: Qualcomm Incorporated (original and current assignee per the source listing)

Key dates: Priority date 2014-06-30; filing date 2014-06-30; publication date 2016-08-09. Legal status listed as Active, with an adjusted expiration of 2034-12-30 (the source notes legal status and priority/expiration are assumptions, not legal conclusions).

Purpose: The disclosure addresses fast handover for access technologies using narrow, link-specific antenna beam pairs, particularly millimeter wave (mmW) systems. Because mmW requires narrow pencil beams and is sensitive to shadowing, and because current mobility protocols (e.g., 3GPP, IETF) are too slow to follow fast shadowing effects, each handover conventionally requires a training sequence between the mobile terminal and target base station, adding handover delay. The stated need is a solution enabling fast handover for such beam-pair technologies.

Plain-language scope: A user equipment (UE) communicates data with a wireless network over a first link to a first base station. The UE acquires a resource to perform a beam training sequence with a second base station, where the acquired resource permits training with the second base station while data is still communicated over the first link. The UE performs the beam training and exchanges signaling with the second base station using that resource to establish a second link, evaluates the second link's strength based on the training, and decides whether to switch data communication from the first to the second link based on that evaluation.

Classification highlights: H04W36/00 series (handover/reselection), H04B7/06 series (beamforming), H04W16/28 (beam steering), H04W36/08 (reselecting an access point).

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9414285/en (fetched 2026-09-23)

What the excerpt does not establish: It provides only partial text. It does not supply the full claims, the complete detailed description, the referenced figures' contents (e.g., FIGS. 1–10 are named but not shown), any specific cited prior-art references, or prosecution history. No litigation, ownership-transfer, validity, or prior-art analysis is included or implied.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:43:56 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9414285. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.