Invalidity dossier

US 9414030

Communication and monitoring system

Current assignee: Sb Ip Holdings LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 10:19:20 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 9,414,030 B2

Title: Communication and monitoring system

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9414030/en

Bibliographic data (as supplied):

  • Publication number: US9414030B2
  • Application number: US14/968,491
  • Inventor: Ronald Carter
  • Original assignee: EYETALK365 LLC; current assignee listed as SB IP Holdings LLC
  • Priority date (stated as an assumption): 2002-10-15
  • Filing date: 2015-12-14
  • Publication date: 2016-08-09
  • Legal status: Expired – Lifetime; anticipated expiration 2023-10-09
  • Other version: US20160105650A1

Purpose and plain-language scope. Based only on the supplied text, the patent is classified as a closed-circuit television (CCTV) system for receiving images from a single remote source, and, more specifically, as a "video door telephone" (H04N7/186), with additional classifications directed to electronically operated locks and entry registration, including identity checks and use of personal physical data such as fingerprints, retinal images, and voice patterns (G07C9/00 series). The prior-art keywords supplied are: entrance, peripheral device, exterior, wireless, person. Taken together, these classifications describe a communication and monitoring system associated with an entrance, in which an exterior/peripheral device communicates wirelessly and captures information about a person at the entrance, potentially interacting with electronic lock or entry-control functions.

What the excerpt does not establish. The supplied text contains no abstract, no claims, and no written description. It therefore does not establish the actual claimed subject matter, the specific components, the wireless protocols used, the identity-verification techniques, or how the system interacts with any lock. The feature-level statements above are inferred only from classification labels and prior-art keywords, not from claim language. Priority date, assignee listings, and legal status are expressly described in the source as assumptions or non-authoritative, and this overview repeats them without verification.

Note: Consistent with the instructions, litigation, ownership transfers, validity, and prior art were not researched; litigation links and reassignment entries merely appear in the supplied source text.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:33:33 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9414030. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.