Invalidity dossier
US 7826567
Added 10/31/2026, 4:01:08 AM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
US 7,826,567 B2 — Patent Overview
Title: Method and apparatus for coarse and fine frequency and timing synchronisation
Patent number / application: US 7,826,567 B2; Application US 10/563,926
Dates (per supplied page; priority date is noted on the page as an assumption):
- Priority date: 2003-07-11
- Filing date: 2004-07-06
- Publication of US 2006/0233288 A1: 2006-10-19
- Grant/publication of US 7,826,567 B2: 2010-11-02
- Adjusted expiration (as listed): 2028-02-21
Assignees (as listed on the supplied page): Original assignee NXP B.V.; current assignee E2E Systems LLC. (The page also lists later reassignments; these are reported only as page data, not analyzed.)
Inventors: Paulus Wilhelmus Franciscus Gruijters; Lucas Hendrikus Gerardus Tan
Purpose and plain-language scope (from the excerpt):
The invention concerns a receiver for receiving frequency signals (examples given: wireless modems, wireless interfaces for wireless networks). The stated problem is that time synchronization is difficult in multipath and/or high-noise environments and is relatively inaccurate in the prior art. The receiver uses a two-step time synchronization: a coarse time synchronization based on one or more autocorrelations, and a fine time synchronization based on one or more crosscorrelations. Because the coarse and fine steps use different correlations and the fine step does not reuse the coarse step's results, the two steps are independent and accuracy is said to improve. Autocorrelation is said to give more reliable coarse results than crosscorrelation.
Described embodiments also include: coarse frequency synchronization by detecting and accumulating phases of samples of a further group of preamble symbols; fine frequency synchronization using phases of samples of another group following that group; automatic gain control performed digitally after coarse time synchronization and before coarse frequency synchronization; and hardware detail such as an autocorrelating unit, integrating unit, delaying units, scaling unit, deciding unit, and logical units.
What the excerpt does not establish: It is marked "[Excerpt only]" and omits text (e.g., the full claim set, the rest of the sixth embodiment, and most dependent claims). Therefore claim scope, claim count, and the complete specification cannot be confirmed from this excerpt.
Generated 10/31/2026, 4:01:23 AM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7826567. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.