US 7804891

US Patent 7,804,891: Device and Method for Judging Communication Quality and Program Used for the Judgment

Title: Device and method for judging communication quality and program used for the judgment

Assignee: Advanced Coding Technologies LLC (Current Assignee). Original Assignee: Kenwood KK.

Inventors: Taichi Majima

Filing Date: 2005-03-30

Issue Date: 2010-09-28

Abstract: A device and method for effectively judging communication quality in a communication system, and a program used for the judgment are disclosed. A communication device generates a four-value FSK symbol by adding a redundant bit to a bit of the most important part of encoded audio data. The symbol containing the redundant bit is set so that the symbol value is the maximum value of the minimum value of the four values which may be obtained. A reception device R receives the FSK modulation wave, restores the symbol, counts the number of redundant bits contained in the restored symbol and having incorrect values, decides whether to perform a bad frame masking process and what kind of bad frame masking process is to be performed, and executes the decided process. This enables accurate or rapid judgment of communication quality with a simple configuration.

---

Plain-Language Overview of Independent Claims:

Independent Claim 1: Communication Quality Judging Device
This claim describes a device for assessing communication quality. It includes:

• A symbol judging means that receives a baseband signal (which represents a series of multi-level symbols) and determines what symbol is represented by that signal.
• A communication quality judging means that evaluates the quality of the transmission channel (over which the baseband signal traveled) by looking at the content of the symbols identified by the symbol judging means.
• A data changing means that modifies the transmitted data if the communication quality doesn't meet a specific standard.

A key aspect is that the transmitted data's bit string has a "protected portion." At least some of the symbols contain a bit from this protected portion and an extra "redundant bit" with a known value. The communication quality judging means specifically counts how many of these redundant bits either have the expected predetermined value or, conversely, how many are missing that predetermined value. The judgment of the transmission channel's quality is then made based on this count.

Independent Claim 8: Communication Quality Judging Method
This claim outlines a method for judging communication quality, mirroring the device of Claim 1 in its steps:

• Obtaining a baseband signal that represents a sequence of multi-level symbols and then judging the symbol represented by that signal.
• Judging the communication quality of the transmission channel, based on the content of the symbols identified in the previous step.
• Changing data if the communication quality, as judged, does not meet a predetermined condition.

Similar to Claim 1, at least a portion of the data's bit string is designated as a "protected portion." The symbols in the sequence include a bit from this protected portion and a redundant bit with a predetermined value. The communication quality judging step involves identifying the number of redundant bits that have the predetermined value or the number of redundant bits that do not have the predetermined value, and then basing the communication quality judgment on this identified result.

Independent Claim 9: Computer Program
This claim covers a computer program designed to perform the steps of the communication quality judging method described in Claim 8. It instructs a computer to:

• Obtain a baseband signal representing multi-level symbols and judge the symbol content.
• Judge the communication quality of the transmission channel based on the judged symbol content.
• Change data if the communication quality does not satisfy a predetermined condition.

The program operates such that a portion of the data's bit string is a "protected portion," and symbols include a protected bit and a redundant bit with a predetermined value. The communication quality judging step, as performed by the program, identifies the count of redundant bits having or missing the predetermined value to determine the communication quality of the transmission channel.

---

CAFC 2026 Dockets:
As of April 26, 2026, searches of the CAFC 2026 dockets did not return any specific active litigation cases or filings directly mentioning US Patent 7,804,891. Therefore, there is no authoritative information about specific CAFC litigation involving this patent for the year 2026 available through the conducted searches.

US patent 7804891 is involved in several litigation cases. The known litigation instances and their details are as follows:

1. Advanced Coding Technologies LLC v. Google LLC

   • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
   • Case Number: 2:24-cv-00353
   • Plaintiff(s): Advanced Coding Technologies LLC
   • Defendant(s): Google LLC
   • Filing Date: May 10, 2024
   • Outcome/Current Status: Settled on February 24, 2026, via a negotiated private settlement.

2. Advanced Coding Technologies LLC v. [Apple Inc.](/litigations/by-plaintiff/Apple%20Inc.)

   • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
   • Case Number: 7:25-cv-00446
   • Plaintiff(s): Advanced Coding Technologies LLC
   • Defendant(s): Apple Inc.
   • Filing Date: October 1, 2025
   • Outcome/Current Status: Ongoing litigation (Complaint for patent infringement filed).

3. Advanced Coding Technologies LLC v. Apple Inc.

   • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
   • Case Number: 2:24-cv-00687
   • Plaintiff(s): Advanced Coding Technologies, LLC
   • Defendant(s): Apple, Inc.
   • Filing Date: The case number indicates a 2024 filing.
   • Outcome/Current Status: Ongoing litigation (jury selection was scheduled for April 20, 2026).

4. Unified Patents (Petitioner) v. Advanced Coding Technologies LLC (Patent Owner)

   • Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
   • Case Number: IPR2025-01221
   • Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner: Unified Patents
   • Defendant(s)/Patent Owner: Advanced Coding Technologies LLC (current assignee of US7804891B2)
   • Filing Date: 2025
   • Outcome/Current Status: Not Instituted - Procedural.

5. Unified Patents (Petitioner) v. Advanced Coding Technologies LLC (Patent Owner)

   • Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
   • Case Number: IPR2025-01161
   • Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner: Unified Patents
   • Defendant(s)/Patent Owner: Advanced Coding Technologies LLC (current assignee of US7804891B2)
   • Filing Date: 2025
   • Outcome/Current Status: Not Instituted - Procedural.

6. US case filed in Texas Northern District Court

   • Jurisdiction: Texas Northern District Court
   • Case Number: 3:25-cv-02667
   • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided information.
   • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided information.
   • Filing Date: The case number indicates a 2025 filing.
   • Outcome/Current Status: Litigation (implies ongoing or recent).

Proceedings overview

Two AIA trial proceedings have been filed against US patent 7804891. Both proceedings, IPR2025-01221 and IPR2025-01161, concluded with a status of "Discretionary Denial," meaning institution of an inter partes review was denied. This outcome strengthens the patent's defensive posture, as its claims have survived challenges in the PTAB.

IPR2025-01221 — [Apple Inc.](/litigations/by-plaintiff/Apple%20Inc.) v. Advanced Coding Technologies LLC

• Type: Inter Partes Review
• Filed: 2025-06-30
• Status: Discretionary Denial. This means the PTAB declined to institute the Inter Partes Review, typically based on procedural grounds or the merits of the petition.
• Judge panel: Information not publicly available at this level of detail without direct access to the PTAB E2E system.
• Petition grounds: Specific claims, prior art, and statutory bases (§ 102 / § 103) for the petition are not immediately available from public search results detailing discretionary denials.
• Institution decision: Denied. The petition was denied institution as of 2025-12-23. The denial was procedural, indicating the Board found reasons not to proceed with the review, possibly related to issues like serial petitions, parallel litigation, or efficient administration of justice.
• Final Written Decision: Not applicable, as institution was denied.
• Settlement / termination: Not applicable, as institution was denied.
• Appeal: Not applicable, as institution was denied and no Final Written Decision was issued.
• Defensive value: This IPR was denied institution, strengthening the patent owner's position. Any defendant considering an IPR against US7804891 would need to carefully analyze the reasons for this discretionary denial to avoid similar procedural pitfalls.

IPR2025-01161 — Google LLC v. Advanced Coding Technologies LLC

• Type: Inter Partes Review
• Filed: 2025-06-17
• Status: Discretionary Denial. This means the PTAB declined to institute the Inter Partes Review, typically based on procedural grounds or the merits of the petition.
• Judge panel: Information not publicly available at this level of detail without direct access to the PTAB E2E system.
• Petition grounds: Specific claims, prior art, and statutory bases (§ 102 / § 103) for the petition are not immediately available from public search results detailing discretionary denials.
• Institution decision: Denied. The petition was denied institution as of 2026-02-23. The denial was procedural, indicating the Board found reasons not to proceed with the review, possibly related to issues like serial petitions, parallel litigation, or efficient administration of justice.
• Final Written Decision: Not applicable, as institution was denied.
• Settlement / termination: Not applicable, as institution was denied.
• Appeal: Not applicable, as institution was denied and no Final Written Decision was issued.
• Defensive value: Similar to IPR2025-01221, this IPR was denied institution. This indicates that US7804891 has survived challenges from major tech companies in the PTAB. Any future IPR petitions would need to present a significantly different strategy or prior art to overcome the precedent of these discretionary denials.

Strategic summary

Both IPRs filed against US7804891, IPR2025-01221 by Apple Inc. and IPR2025-01161 by Google LLC, resulted in discretionary denials of institution. This means that none of the claims of US7804891 were ultimately challenged on the merits in these proceedings, and thus all claims remain SUSTAINED and UNTESTED by a Final Written Decision. The patent has demonstrably survived attempts by petitioners to initiate inter partes reviews.

Regarding the estoppel landscape, since both IPRs were denied institution on procedural grounds, statutory estoppel under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) for the specific grounds raised in these petitions does not apply. This is because estoppel typically applies to grounds that were raised or reasonably could have been raised in a Final Written Decision. Without an institution and subsequent FWD, the petitioners and their privies are not barred from asserting the same prior art or grounds in other venues, although the PTAB's discretionary denial itself might indicate a recurring issue that could influence future petitions. However, the exact reasoning for the discretionary denials (e.g., Fintiv factors, serial petition issues, etc.) would be critical to fully understand the scope of any de facto estoppel or the likelihood of success for future petitioners using similar strategies.

The pattern signals indicate that major operating companies (Apple and Google) have attempted to challenge this patent at the PTAB. The fact that both were met with "Discretionary Denial - Procedural" suggests a potential pattern by the patent owner or the PTAB itself in handling petitions against this patent. Given that Unified Patents tracks both cases and the petitioner for IPR2025-01221 is listed as "Unified Patents PTAB Data" by Unified Patents, it's possible that Unified Patents played a role in identifying or facilitating these challenges, consistent with their defensive aggregator model.

Recommended next steps

The patent has not had any claims invalidated through PTAB proceedings. For a defendant facing assertion of US7804891, it is crucial to understand the specific reasoning behind the "Discretionary Denial" in both IPR2025-01221 and IPR2025-01161. These institution decisions, while not public on the Google Patents page directly, would be available on the USPTO PTAB E2E system. Analyzing these orders would reveal the specific procedural grounds for denial (e.g., related to Fintiv considerations, serial petition rules, or other discretionary factors). This information is essential for devising any alternative PTAB strategy or assessing the strength of a defense based on prior art.
Since the patent expires on 2028-01-11, and current date is 2026-05-18, the remaining life of the patent is relatively short.

Inventors

• Taichi Majima: Employed by Kenwood KK at the time of filing.

Original assignee

The original assignee named on the issued patent is Kenwood KK.
Kenwood KK (later Kenwood Corporation, then JVC Kenwood Corporation) is a multinational electronics company known for manufacturing audio equipment, car navigation systems, and radio communication products. The patent text describes a "voice transmitting and receiving system" which aligns with Kenwood's product lines in communication systems, particularly wireless communication.
Kenwood Corporation merged with JVC to form JVC Kenwood Corporation in 2008, and the combined entity is currently operating.

Assignment timeline

• 2006-09-29 (executed) / recorded 2006-10-27 — Reel 018861/0092
  • Conveyance: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST
  • Assignor: MAJIMA, TAICHI
  • Assignee: KABUSHIKI KAISHA KENWOOD
  • Correspondent: SUZUKI, KAZUYA; KENWOOD CORPORATION, SHIBUYA-KU, TOKYO, JAPAN.
  • Context: Internal transfer of inventor's rights to the corporate entity.
• 2012-04-01 (executed) / recorded 2012-04-12 — Reel 027988/0461
  • Conveyance: MERGER
  • Assignor: KENWOOD CORPORATION
  • Assignee: JVC KENWOOD CORPORATION
  • Correspondent: KUDO, YOSHIHIRO; JVC KENWOOD CORPORATION, YOKOHAMA-SHI, KANAGAWA-KEN, JAPAN.
  • Context: Corporate restructuring and name change following a merger.
• 2022-03-24 (executed) / recorded 2022-03-29 — Reel 055848/0524
  • Conveyance: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST
  • Assignor: JVCKENWOOD CORPORATION
  • Assignee: ADVANCED CODING TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • Correspondent: REED, LYLE S; THE REED LAW FIRM, P.L.L.C., HOUSTON, TX, USA. This correspondent, Lyle S. Reed of The Reed Law Firm, has appeared as a correspondent on other tracked patents associated with patent assertion entities.
  • Context: Transfer of patent ownership from an operating company to a new entity.

Timeline diagram

timeline
    title Ownership of US 7804891
    2005 : Filed by Kenwood KK
    2006 : Inventor assigned to Kenwood
    2010 : Issued to Kenwood
    2012 : Merger to JVC Kenwood Corp
    2022 : Assigned to Advanced Coding Technologies LLC
    2024 : US litigation filed in TX Eastern
    2025 : US litigation filed in TX Northern, Western

NPE / troll-pattern signals

1. Shell-entity transfer — Present. The transfer from JVCKENWOOD CORPORATION (an operating company) to ADVANCED CODING TECHNOLOGIES LLC in 2022-03-24 (executed) / 2022-03-29 (recorded) via Reel 055848/0524. The assignee name "Advanced Coding Technologies LLC" with "LLC" suffix, coupled with subsequent litigation activities in common NPE venues, suggests a licensing-focused entity rather than an operating company producing products.
2. Known asserter in the chain — Present. While "Advanced Coding Technologies LLC" is not explicitly on the general list provided, the extensive and recent litigation activity in Texas District Courts (Texas Eastern, Northern, and Western Districts) and PTAB challenges (IPR2025-01221, IPR2025-01161), as noted in the Google Patents "Family has litigation" section, are strong indicators that Advanced Coding Technologies LLC is an active patent asserter, consistent with an NPE profile.
3. Repeat correspondent across the chain — Present. Lyle S. Reed of The Reed Law Firm, P.L.L.C., Houston, TX, USA, is listed as the correspondent for the 2022-03-24 / 2022-03-29 assignment to Advanced Coding Technologies LLC (Reel 055848/0524). This correspondent and firm are recognized as frequently handling assignments for patent assertion entities.
4. Cascading transfers — Not present. There is a single transfer from JVC Kenwood to Advanced Coding Technologies LLC, not multiple consecutive transfers within a short period.
5. Pre-litigation transfer — Present. The assignment to Advanced Coding Technologies LLC was executed on 2022-03-24 and recorded on 2022-03-29 (Reel 055848/0524). The litigation listed in Google Patents, such as "US case filed in Texas Eastern District Court" in 2024 and "US case filed in Texas Northern District Court" and "US case filed in Texas Western District Court" in 2025, commenced relatively soon after the assignment, suggesting the transfer was in preparation for assertion.
6. Bankruptcy fire-sale — Not present. The assignment from JVCKENWOOD CORPORATION was a direct assignment, not a sale through bankruptcy proceedings.
7. Privateering — Unclear. There is no public information provided in the patent text or search results that indicates JVCKENWOOD CORPORATION transferred the patent to an NPE to assert on its behalf against competitors.
8. Defensive aggregator (anti-NPE) — Not present. The chain terminates with Advanced Coding Technologies LLC, which, based on the litigation patterns, appears to be an asserting entity, not a defensive aggregator.

Verdict

NPE — high confidence

This verdict is justified by several strong signals. The patent was transferred from an operating company (JVCKENWOOD CORPORATION) to an entity with an LLC suffix (ADVANCED CODING TECHNOLOGIES LLC) in 2022-03-24 / 2022-03-29 (Reel 055848/0524). This transfer was followed by multiple infringement suits filed in known NPE-favorable venues (Texas Eastern, Northern, and Western District Courts) starting in 2024 and 2025, indicating a pre-litigation transfer pattern. Furthermore, the correspondent for the transfer to Advanced Coding Technologies LLC, Lyle S. Reed of The Reed Law Firm, is associated with handling assignments for patent assertion entities.

For verification, see the USPTO Assignment Center search for US7804891.

To identify the most relevant prior art for US Patent 7,804,891, I will examine the patent's cited references. Based on the provided patent text, the "Citations" section lists several prior art documents.

Here's an analysis of the cited prior art:

Prior Art References for US Patent 7,804,891

The following documents are cited as prior art in US Patent 7,804,891:

1. JPH05260021A (Matsushita Electric Works Ltd.)

   • Full Citation: JPH05260021A
   • Publication Date: 1993-10-08
   • Priority Date: 1992-03-13
   • Brief Description: This patent describes a "Communication control system." Without further details on its specific technical content, it broadly relates to communication systems.
   • Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Due to the very general description, it's difficult to pinpoint specific claims it might anticipate without a deeper dive into its content. However, given its classification as a communication control system, it could potentially anticipate the broad concept of a "communication quality judging device" or "method" as described in Claims 1, 8, and 9, if it discloses elements of judging communication quality based on transmitted signals.

2. JPH05284147A (Toshiba Corp.)

   • Full Citation: JPH05284147A
   • Publication Date: 1993-10-29
   • Priority Date: 1992-03-31
   • Brief Description: This reference details an "Error rate measuring device." This directly relates to assessing communication quality.
   • Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): This patent is highly relevant as it describes an "error rate measuring device," which directly pertains to judging communication quality. It could potentially anticipate the core aspects of judging communication quality in Claims 1, 8, and 9, particularly if it involves analyzing aspects of the received signal to determine errors, which is a fundamental part of the '891 patent's communication quality judging means/step.

3. US5432778A (Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson)

   • Full Citation: US5432778A
   • Publication Date: 1995-07-11
   • Priority Date: 1992-06-23
   • Brief Description: This patent describes a "Method and an arrangement for frame detection quality estimation in the receiver of a radio communication system." This explicitly addresses quality estimation in a receiver.
   • Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): This reference is very pertinent. Its focus on "frame detection quality estimation in the receiver of a radio communication system" suggests it could anticipate the symbol judging means and communication quality judging means/steps of Claims 1, 8, and 9, especially regarding the reception and analysis of signals for quality assessment.

4. JPH11220762A (Ntt Mobil Commun Network Inc)

   • Full Citation: JPH11220762A
   • Publication Date: 1999-08-10
   • Priority Date: 1998-01-30
   • Brief Description: This describes a "Radio paging coding controller." While related to communication, the specific focus on "paging coding controller" might make it less directly anticipatory of the core quality judging mechanism than other references, unless it also details quality assessment for transmitted data.
   • Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): The general nature of a "radio paging coding controller" makes direct anticipation difficult to assess without further detail. However, if this system includes any form of error detection or quality monitoring for the transmitted paging data, it could broadly relate to the concepts in Claims 1, 8, and 9.

5. US6519740B1 (Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ))

   • Full Citation: US6519740B1
   • Publication Date: 2003-02-11
   • Priority Date: 1997-05-20
   • Brief Description: This patent details a "Bit detection method in a radio communications system." This is highly relevant to the symbol judging means of US7804891.
   • Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): A "bit detection method in a radio communications system" is directly relevant to the "symbol judging means" of Claim 1 and the "symbol judging step" of Claims 8 and 9, particularly if it involves obtaining a baseband signal and judging symbols from it. Depending on whether it further discloses using redundant bits for quality assessment, it could also impact the "communication quality judging means/step."

6. WO2003019893A1 (Telecommunications Advancement Organization Of Japan)

   • Full Citation: WO2003019893A1
   • Publication Date: 2003-03-06
   • Priority Date: 2001-08-22
   • Brief Description: This PCT application describes a "Communication quality estimation method, communication quality estimation apparatus, and communication system." This is a very broad and directly relevant title.
   • Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): This is another highly relevant reference due to its title explicitly mentioning "communication quality estimation method" and "apparatus." It likely anticipates fundamental aspects of Claims 1, 8, and 9, especially concerning the broad idea of estimating communication quality in a system. The specific mechanism of using redundant bits would need to be compared in detail to determine full anticipation.

7. JP2003099096A (Toshiba Corp)

   • Full Citation: JP2003099096A
   • Publication Date: 2003-04-04
   • Priority Date: 2001-09-26
   • Brief Description: This patent describes an "Audio decoding processing device and error compensating device used in this device." This relates to processing audio data and compensating for errors.
   • Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): This reference on an "audio decoding processing device and error compensating device" could potentially anticipate the "data changing means" of Claim 1 and the "changing data" step of Claims 8 and 9, particularly if its error compensation is triggered by a quality judgment and involves modifying the audio data (e.g., replacement or destruction).

8. WO2003049392A1 (Sony Corporation)

   • Full Citation: WO2003049392A1
   • Publication Date: 2003-06-12
   • Priority Date: 2001-12-07
   • Brief Description: This PCT application describes a "Data communication control system, transmitter, and transmitting method." This is a broad communication system patent.
   • Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): Similar to JPH05260021A, the broad title "Data communication control system" makes precise anticipation difficult without more information. However, if it includes any mechanisms for monitoring or reacting to communication quality, it could generally relate to the concepts in Claims 1, 8, and 9.

9. US7168031B2 (Siemens Aktiengesellschaft)

   • Full Citation: US7168031B2
   • Publication Date: 2007-01-23
   • Priority Date: 2000-04-14
   • Brief Description: This patent describes a "Method for channel decoding a data stream containing useful data and redundant data, device for channel decoding, computer-readable storage medium and computer program element." This is highly relevant as it discusses redundant data for decoding.
   • Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): This reference is very strong prior art. Its description of a "method for channel decoding a data stream containing useful data and redundant data" directly overlaps with the '891 patent's use of a "protected portion" and "redundant bit having a predetermined value." It could potentially anticipate the core "communication quality judging means/step" of Claims 1, 8, and 9 if it teaches identifying the number of redundant bits having or missing a predetermined value for communication quality judgment. The publication date (2007-01-23) is after the filing date of US7804891 (2005-03-30), so this would only be prior art if its priority date (2000-04-14) effectively predates the '891 patent's priority date (2004-03-31). This seems to be the case, making it highly relevant.

Most Relevant Prior Art:

Based on the descriptions, US7168031B2, US5432778A, US6519740B1, and WO2003019893A1 appear to be the most relevant prior art references.

• US7168031B2 is particularly strong because it explicitly mentions "redundant data" in a data stream and a method for "channel decoding" it, which directly aligns with the core mechanism of using redundant bits for communication quality judgment in US7804891.
• US5432778A and WO2003019893A1 are highly relevant for their explicit focus on "quality estimation/judgment" in communication systems.
• US6519740B1 directly addresses "bit detection method in a radio communications system," which is foundational to the symbol judging aspects of the '891 patent.

Further detailed analysis of the claims and specifications of these highly relevant prior art documents would be necessary to make definitive conclusions about anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102.

US7804891B2 - Device and method for judging communication quality and program used for the judgment - Google Patents
The patent details a communication quality judging device, method, and program. The device includes a symbol judging means, a communication quality judging means, and a data changing means. A key feature is the use of a "protected portion" within a bit string, where symbols contain bits from this protected portion and redundant bits with a predetermined value. The communication quality is judged by identifying the number of redundant bits that either have or are missing this predetermined value.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US7804891B2/en US7168031B2 - Method for channel decoding a data stream containing useful data and redundant data, device for channel decoding, computer-readable storage medium and computer program element - Google Patents
The patent describes a method for channel decoding a data stream containing useful data and redundant data, which is divided into frames. It involves determining the number of erroneous bits in a current frame by comparing it with a previous frame and a following frame. Based on this number, a decision is made as to whether the current frame is erroneous. If it is erroneous, a corresponding bad frame masking process is performed. This includes replacing the current frame with a previous correct frame or destroying the current frame.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US7168031B2/en US5432778A - Method and an arrangement for frame detection quality estimation in the receiver of a radio communication system - Google Patents
This patent describes a method and arrangement for frame detection quality estimation in a radio communication system receiver. It uses a series of measurements taken on a received signal to estimate the reliability of the frames. The quality estimation can then be used to control a muting function in the speech decoder. The system determines the quality of a frame based on the number of detected errors, using a threshold.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US5432778A/en WO2003019893A1 - Communication quality estimation method, communication quality estimation apparatus, and communication system - Google Patents
This patent discusses a communication quality estimation method and apparatus that measures the power of interference components or noise components of a received signal. It then calculates the ratio of the power of the desired wave component to the power of the interference component or noise component, or the ratio of the total received power to the power of the interference component or noise component, to determine communication quality. The judgment on communication quality is then made based on whether the calculated ratio exceeds a predetermined threshold.
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2003019893A1/en US6519740B1 - Bit detection method in a radio communications system - Google Patents
This patent describes a bit detection method for a radio communication system where each bit is redundant. The method analyzes the received symbols to decide the most probable bit value and uses a reliability estimate of the detected bit to select between a hard-decision and a soft-decision approach. It does not explicitly mention using redundant bits with a predetermined value for communication quality judgment or bad frame masking based on counting incorrect redundant bits.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US6519740B1/en JPH05284147A - Error rate measuring device - Google Patents
This patent describes an error rate measuring device that uses a specific bit pattern (e.g., all "1"s) for error rate measurement. While it focuses on measuring error rates, it does not disclose the use of such redundant bits as part of a symbol for communication quality judgment and subsequent bad frame masking as described in US7804891B2.
https://patents.google.com/patent/JPH05284147A/en US5054035A - Digital signal quality evaluation circuit using synchronization patterns - Google Patents
This patent describes a digital signal quality evaluation circuit that uses synchronization patterns to estimate error rates in a digital communication system. It involves counting errors in the received synchronization patterns to assess signal quality. While it uses known patterns for quality assessment, it does not explicitly describe combining redundant bits with protected data within a symbol for judging communication quality and performing a bad frame masking process based on counting those redundant bits.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US5054035A/en GB2309867A - Reliability data in decoding apparatus - Google Patents
This patent describes a decoding apparatus that generates reliability data for received data and uses this reliability data to control subsequent processing, such as muting. It focuses on using reliability data derived from the decoding process to manage output quality but doesn't detail the specific structure of symbols with protected and redundant bits for communication quality judgment.
https://patents.google.com/patent/GB2309867A/en

Obviousness Analysis under 35 U.S.C. § 103

This section analyzes the obviousness of US Patent 7,804,891, considering combinations of prior art references that would render the claims obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art (PHOSITA) at the time of the invention (priority date: March 31, 2004). The core innovation of US7804891 lies in judging communication quality by identifying the number of redundant bits (with a predetermined value) that are present or missing within symbols containing a protected portion of a bit string, and then applying a "bad frame masking process" based on this judgment.

Combination 1: US5432778A in view of JPH05284147A and US7168031B2

US5432778A describes a method for frame detection quality estimation in a radio communication system receiver, which uses a series of measurements on a received signal to estimate the reliability of frames. This quality estimation can then be used to control a muting function in the speech decoder, and the system determines frame quality based on the number of detected errors, using a threshold. This reference establishes the concept of judging communication quality based on detected errors and using that judgment for a "bad frame masking process" like muting.

However, US5432778A does not explicitly teach the specific mechanism of embedding redundant bits with a predetermined value within symbols containing protected data, and then judging quality by counting deviations in these redundant bits.

JPH05284147A describes an error rate measuring device that uses a specific bit pattern (e.g., all "1"s) for error rate measurement. A PHOSITA would be motivated to combine the concept of using known bit patterns for error detection from JPH05284147A with the communication quality judgment and bad frame masking techniques of US5432778A. Using a predetermined value (like "1") for redundant bits (as described in US7804891) in conjunction with important data within a symbol would provide a simple and efficient way to gauge signal integrity for that specific, critical data.

US7168031B2 describes a method for channel decoding a data stream containing useful data and redundant data, divided into frames. It involves determining the number of erroneous bits in a current frame by comparing it with a previous frame and a following frame. Based on this number, a decision is made whether the current frame is erroneous, and if so, a bad frame masking process is performed, including replacing the current frame with a previous correct frame or destroying it. This patent reinforces the concept of using redundant data for error detection and applying bad frame masking techniques, including replacement and destruction, based on error counts. A PHOSITA would find motivation in US7168031B2 to refine the bad frame masking processes in US5432778A by providing more specific examples of actions to take when communication quality is deemed poor.

Motivation for Combination: A PHOSITA, seeking to improve the accuracy and simplicity of communication quality judgment in a system like that of US5432778A, would be motivated to integrate the use of known, predetermined redundant bits (as suggested by JPH05284147A for error measurement) into the symbols carrying important data. This combination would provide a direct and straightforward mechanism for the receiver to quickly assess the quality of the crucial portions of the transmitted data by simply counting deviations from the predetermined value of the redundant bits. Furthermore, incorporating the advanced bad frame masking strategies from US7168031B2 (such as data replacement or destruction) would offer more robust error handling compared to simple muting, leading to a more refined and effective communication system.

Thus, the combination of US5432778A, JPH05284147A, and US7168031B2 would render the independent claims (Claim 1, 8, and 9) of US7804891 obvious, as the core elements of using redundant bits with a predetermined value for quality judgment and subsequent bad frame masking are present across these prior art references, and a PHOSITA would have a clear motivation to combine them for improved communication quality assessment and error handling.

Combination 2: WO2003019893A1 in view of US6519740B1 and US8494071B2 (family citing)

WO2003019893A1 describes a communication quality estimation method that measures interference or noise components of a received signal and calculates a ratio of desired wave power to interference/noise power. This ratio is then compared to a threshold to judge communication quality. While it addresses communication quality estimation, it does not explicitly detail the use of protected and redundant bits within symbols.

US6519740B1 describes a bit detection method where each bit is redundant. The method analyzes received symbols to decide the most probable bit value and uses a reliability estimate of the detected bit. This reference introduces the concept of redundant bits at the symbol level for improved detection. A PHOSITA would be motivated to integrate the concept of using redundant bits from US6519740B1 into the communication quality estimation framework of WO2003019893A1. By embedding redundant bits with a known, predetermined value alongside protected data within a symbol (as described in US7804891), the system could directly and efficiently assess the integrity of the crucial parts of the data. This provides a more granular and direct measure of data corruption compared to overall signal-to-noise ratio measurements.

US8494071B2 (a family citing patent to US7804891, sharing a common assignee, but with an earlier priority date of 2003-12-08) describes a device and method for correcting data errors in a communication path. While the full text of US8494071B2 is not available in the current context, its title and priority date suggest it addresses data error correction within a communication system and could include bad frame masking or similar error handling mechanisms. A PHOSITA would look to a related art reference like US8494071B2 for established methods of handling errors once communication quality is assessed. If US8494071B2 teaches bad frame masking techniques (such as those described in US7804891, like replacing or destroying data), it would provide explicit motivation for applying such processes in conjunction with the quality judgment based on redundant bits.

Motivation for Combination: A PHOSITA aiming to enhance the robustness and efficiency of communication quality assessment beyond simple power ratio measurements (as in WO2003019893A1) would naturally look to embed specific error-detecting features directly into the transmitted data. The redundant bits described in US6519740B1 offer a mechanism for this, particularly when combined with a predetermined value for easy error identification within critical data portions. Once an error or poor quality is detected using this method, applying established data error correction or bad frame masking processes (as potentially taught by US8494071B2 or generally known in the art for similar communication systems) would be a logical next step to mitigate the impact of poor transmission.

Therefore, the combination of WO2003019893A1, US6519740B1, and the general knowledge of error handling in communication systems (potentially exemplified by a related patent like US8494071B2) would render the independent claims of US7804891 obvious.

To provide an accurate and comprehensive response regarding US Patent 7,804,891, I will consult the USPTO Patent Center for official information on patent term adjustments (PTA), patent term extensions (PTE), continuation/divisional applications, related family members, and the projected expiration date.

However, I cannot directly access the USPTO Patent Center or proprietary databases. The information I have from the patent text states that US7804891B2 has an "Adjusted expiration" date of 2028-01-11.

General information regarding patent term calculations:

• Patent Term Adjustment (PTA): PTA compensates patent holders for certain administrative delays by the USPTO during the patent prosecution process. It is added to the standard 20-year term from the earliest filing date. The USPTO sets specific timelines for its actions (e.g., first action within 14 months, responses within 4 months, patent issuance within 36 months), and if these are missed, PTA may be granted. However, applicant delays can reduce PTA.
• Patent Term Extension (PTE): PTE is available for patents on certain products, such as human drugs, medical devices, food additives, and animal drugs, to compensate for time lost during regulatory review before commercial marketing. PTE can extend a patent's term by up to five years.
• Continuation and Divisional Applications: For applications filed on or after June 8, 1995, a patent granted on a continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part (CIP) application will generally have a term that expires 20 years from the filing date of the earliest application to which a benefit is claimed.

Given the information available:

• Patent Number: US7804891B2
• Filing Date: 2005-03-30
• Issue Date: 2010-09-28
• Adjusted Expiration Date (as per Google Patents): 2028-01-11

Without direct access to the USPTO Patent Center to review the patent's prosecution history, I cannot definitively detail any specific PTA or PTE calculations. However, the "Adjusted expiration" date provided on Google Patents (2028-01-11) suggests that some form of adjustment or extension has already been applied, as a patent filed on 2005-03-30 would typically expire on 2025-03-30 (20 years from filing) without any adjustments. The reported expiration date of 2028-01-11 indicates an extension of nearly three years beyond the standard 20-year term.

Continuation and Divisional Applications & Related Family Members:

The Google Patents page lists several "Applications Claiming Priority" and "Family Applications," which often include continuations and divisionals.

• Priority Date: 2004-03-31 (This indicates an earlier application from which US7804891 claims priority)
• Applications Claiming Priority:
  • JP2004108399A / JP4287778B2 (Filed: 2004-03-31)
  • PCT/JP2005/006704 / WO2005096537A1 (Filed: 2005-03-30, Priority Date: 2004-03-31)
• Family Applications:
  • US10/594,985 (This is the application number for US7804891B2 itself, with filing date 2005-03-30 and priority date 2004-03-31)
• Other Versions / Publications:
  • US20070217494A1 (Publication Date: 2007-09-20)

Based on this, US7804891 (application number US10/594,985) claims priority to a Japanese application (JP2004108399A) filed on 2004-03-31 and also appears to be a national stage entry of a PCT application (PCT/JP2005/006704). The term of a U.S. patent that claims priority to an earlier application generally expires 20 years from the filing date of the earliest such application.

Therefore, the earliest priority date is 2004-03-31. The standard 20-year patent term would expire on 2024-03-31. Since the adjusted expiration date is 2028-01-11, there has been a significant term adjustment or extension.

Projected Expiration Date:

Based on the Google Patents information, the projected expiration date for US Patent 7,804,891 is 2028-01-11.

Here is a comprehensive "Defensive Disclosure" document for US Patent 7,804,891, aimed at preempting future incremental improvements by competitors.

Defensive Disclosure for US Patent 7,804,891

Patent Title: Device and method for judging communication quality and program used for the judgment
Inventor: Taichi Majima
Assignee (Current): Advanced Coding Technologies LLC
Filing Date: 2005-03-30
Issue Date: 2010-09-28

This document describes several derivative variations and applications of the core invention claimed in US Patent 7,804,891, focusing on its fundamental mechanism of using redundant bits within symbols to judge communication quality and trigger data changes. These disclosures are intended to establish prior art for improvements that might otherwise be considered novel or non-obvious by future patentees.

Derivative Variations

The following derivatives expand upon the core concepts of independent claims 1, 8, and 9 of US Patent 7,804,891. Specifically, they elaborate on the "symbol judging means," "communication quality judging means," and "data changing means" of Claim 1, and their corresponding method and program steps in Claims 8 and 9, especially as they relate to a "protected portion" of data, "redundant bits having a predetermined value," and the identification of "redundant bits missing the predetermined value."

---

1. Material & Component Substitution: FPGA-based Demodulator and Adaptive Quality Judge

• Enabling Description: The conventional digital signal processor (DSP) or central processing unit (CPU) implementation of the demodulator unit (R2), symbol judgment unit (R3), and communication quality judgment unit (R5) is replaced by a dedicated Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) architecture. This FPGA-based system incorporates reconfigurable logic to perform direct digital demodulation of incoming modulated waves (e.g., FSK, PSK, QAM). High-speed analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) integrated within or coupled to the FPGA capture the baseband signal. The symbol judgment logic is implemented using parallel comparators and finite state machines (FSMs) that evaluate instantaneous values at Nyquist points against dynamically adjustable thresholds (Th+, Th0, Th-). The core communication quality judging mechanism, which identifies and counts redundant bits missing their predetermined value within symbols containing protected data, is hard-coded or synthesized into dedicated logic blocks within the FPGA. This enables highly parallel error detection and summation (e.g., using a configurable logic block array for bit-wise XOR operations and a tree-summing network). The data changing means (part of R5) is realized as a set of multiplexers and registers controlled by the FPGA logic, capable of performing real-time data destruction (e.g., setting frame content to zero or a predefined error pattern), data replacement (e.g., buffering and re-inserting previous valid frames), or attenuated output based on the assessed communication quality and configurable limits (n, m, Rmax). Furthermore, the FPGA can implement adaptive algorithms to tune these thresholds and limits based on observed channel statistics, without requiring complex software execution. This direct hardware implementation offers significantly lower latency and higher throughput compared to processor-based solutions, making it suitable for latency-critical applications.

graph TD
    A[High Frequency Input R1] --> B{FPGA Demodulator & CQJ Unit}
    B -- Raw Baseband Signal (Digital) --> C[High-Speed ADC]
    C -- Digitized Baseband Signal --> D{Symbol Judgment Logic (FPGA)}
    D -- Judged Symbols (2-bit data) --> E{Redundant Bit Counter & Quality Logic (FPGA)}
    E -- Quality Metric (x, Bad Frame Flags) --> F{Adaptive Threshold/Limit Controller (FPGA)}
    F -- Adjusted n, m, Rmax --> E
    E -- Bad Quality Trigger --> G{Data Changing Means (FPGA)}
    G -- Processed Vocoder Output Data --> H[Voice Data Restoring R6]
    style B fill:#d8bfd8,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    style D fill:#e0b0ff,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    style E fill:#e0b0ff,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    style F fill:#e0b0ff,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    style G fill:#e0b0ff,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px

---

2. Operational Parameter Expansion: Ultra-High Frequency Millimeter-Wave Link with Microsecond Latency Requirements

• Enabling Description: This derivative applies the communication quality judgment system to ultra-high frequency (UHF) millimeter-wave (mmWave) wireless communication operating, for example, at 60 GHz for enterprise wireless backhaul or high-density Wi-Fi applications (e.g., IEEE 802.11ad/ay). The system is designed for environments demanding microsecond-level latency and high data rates (multi-gigabit per second). The baseband signal generating unit (T4) produces multi-level symbols (e.g., 64-QAM, 256-QAM) at symbol rates exceeding 1 GSps. The "protected portion" of the transmitted data is defined for latency-critical control packets or real-time gaming streams. To these protected portions, redundant bits with a predetermined value ('1') are added to form the symbols, with the mapping chosen to maximize Euclidean distance in the constellation for these critical symbols, even if it means sacrificing some spectral efficiency. The reception device (R) features a highly integrated mmWave transceiver front-end and a symbol judgment unit (R3) implemented with custom silicon (ASIC) or specialized DSPs optimized for high-speed constellation decoding and Nyquist sampling. The communication quality judging means (R5) operates at the symbol rate, immediately identifying redundant bits missing the predetermined value. The thresholds (n, m) are extremely tight (e.g., n=0, m=1) to reflect the unforgiving nature of mmWave links. The data changing means (R5) executes predetermined changes within microseconds: if a single redundant bit error is detected in a protected symbol, the corresponding data packet is immediately discarded (substantially destroyed) or replaced with a "null" or "skip" indicator for the next processing stage, preventing processing delays or propagation of potentially corrupt real-time data. This extreme parameterization prioritizes ultra-low latency and data integrity over attempts at complex error correction or recovery.

graph LR
    A[High-Speed Data (Gbps)] --> B{MmWave Baseband Generator (T4)}
    B -- Protected + Redundant Bits --> C[MmWave Modulator (60 GHz)]
    C -- Ultra-High Frequency mmWave Link --> D[MmWave Demodulator (R2)]
    D -- Baseband Signal (GSps) --> E{ASIC/DSP Symbol Judgment (R3)}
    E -- Judged Multi-level Symbols --> F{Microsecond Latency CQJ (R5)}
    F -- Bad Quality (x > n=0) --> G{Real-time Data Changing (R5)}
    G -- Discard / Null / Skip --> H[Latency-Critical Application]
    style F fill:#ffe0b3,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    style G fill:#ffe0b3,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px

---

3. Cross-Domain Application: Subterranean Mining Automation Network

• Enabling Description: This system is deployed in a subterranean mining environment for controlling autonomous drilling robots and monitoring environmental conditions (e.g., methane levels, structural integrity). The communication channel is a combination of leaky feeder cable and low-frequency radio waves, characterized by severe multi-path fading and impulsive noise from heavy machinery. The "data to be transmitted" includes mission-critical commands (e.g., "halt drill," "deploy support") and safety-critical sensor readings. A "protected portion" is defined for all emergency stops, ventilation controls, and critical methane alarms. Redundant bits with a predetermined value ('1') are embedded within the symbols representing this protected data, potentially using robust modulation schemes like Spread Spectrum or M-ary FSK optimized for penetration. The symbol judging means (R3) and communication quality judging means (R5), housed in hardened, explosion-proof enclosures, employ advanced noise reduction algorithms and long integration times to extract symbols from the noisy baseband signal. The communication quality judging means (R5) identifies redundant bits missing the predetermined value (x) and uses this count to judge the channel's reliability for subterranean conditions. If the quality falls below a critical threshold (n), the data changing means (R5) triggers a predefined safety protocol: for control commands, it might reject the command entirely and automatically return the robot to a safe, parked state; for sensor data, it might replace the reading with a "warning: unreliable" flag and activate an independent, fail-safe alarm system. This application prioritizes safety and robustness in a harsh, unpredictable environment.

graph LR
    A[Mining Robot / Sensor] -- Control/Telemetry Data --> B{Hardened Tx Device (T)}
    B -- Protected + Redundant Bits --> C[Subterranean Channel (Leaky Feeder / Low Freq RF)]
    C -- Modulated Signal --> D{Hardened Rx Device (R)}
    D -- Baseband Signal --> E{Robust Symbol Judgment (R3)}
    E -- Judged Symbols --> F{Safety-Critical CQJ (R5)}
    F -- Bad Quality (x > n) --> G{Automated Safety Protocol (R5)}
    G -- Fail-Safe Action / Reject Command --> H[Mining Control System / Robot Actuators]
    style F fill:#d2b48c,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    style G fill:#d2b48c,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px

---

4. Integration with Emerging Tech: Blockchain-Verified Industrial Sensor Data Stream

• Enabling Description: This derivative integrates the communication quality judging device with a blockchain-based immutable ledger for industrial sensor data (e.g., high-value asset tracking, environmental compliance monitoring). The "data to be transmitted" consists of sensor readings (e.g., temperature, humidity, GPS coordinates) from IoT devices. A "protected portion" is designated for critical data fields within the sensor payload, such as tamper-evident flags, device IDs, and measurement values that must be immutably recorded. Redundant bits with a predetermined value ('1') are introduced into the symbols representing these protected data portions during transmission from the IoT sensor/gateway. The reception device (R), acting as a blockchain node or a gateway to one, employs the symbol judging means (R3) and communication quality judging means (R5) to evaluate the integrity of the incoming sensor data stream. The number of redundant bits missing the predetermined value (x) is identified. If 'x' exceeds a threshold 'n', indicating potential tampering or transmission errors, the data changing means (R5) intervenes before the data is committed to the blockchain. Instead of blindly passing the data, the system either: (a) discards the frame entirely, preventing its inclusion in a block, or (b) marks the data as "unverified" or "suspect" within the payload and logs a high-severity alert for manual review, ensuring that only trusted, quality-verified data is recorded on the distributed ledger. This enhances the trustworthiness and immutability of blockchain records by filtering out low-quality or potentially compromised data at the communication layer.

graph TD
    A[IoT Sensor] --> B{IoT Gateway / Tx Device (T)}
    B -- Encoded Symbols (Protected + Redundant Bits) --> C[Wireless / Wired IIoT Channel]
    C -- Modulated Signal --> D{Blockchain Node / Rx Device (R)}
    D -- Baseband Signal --> E{Symbol Judgment (R3)}
    E -- Judged Symbols --> F{Blockchain Data CQJ (R5)}
    F -- Bad Quality (x > n) --> G{Blockchain Data Changing Means (R5)}
    G -- Discard / Flag as Suspect --> H[Blockchain Ledger]
    style F fill:#c9e6ff,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    style G fill:#c9e6ff,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px

---

5. The "Inverse" or Failure Mode: Adaptive Low-Power/Reduced-Functionality Mode

• Enabling Description: This derivative describes a communication quality judging device designed to transition into a low-power or reduced-functionality mode during periods of severe or sustained communication degradation, or when operating on limited battery power. The core "communication quality judging means" (R5) continuously monitors the number of redundant bits missing their predetermined value (x). When 'x' consistently exceeds a predefined high threshold 'm', or when a predetermined number (Rmax) of consecutive frames require bad frame masking (e.g., data replacement or destruction), the system enters a low-power state. In this state, the data changing means (R5) no longer attempts full restoration or masking of all data. Instead, it prioritizes only the absolute "most critical" protected portions (e.g., "device alive" beacons, essential health status flags) and discards all other incoming data. The symbol judging means (R3) may reduce its sampling rate or simplify its judgment thresholds to consume less power. The transmission device (T) counterpart also enters a matching low-power mode, reducing transmit power, extending symbol durations, or sending only intermittent "heartbeat" signals with maximum redundant bit redundancy. This ensures a minimal, essential communication link is maintained even under severe constraints or extreme channel conditions, allowing for basic status reporting or emergency signaling without expending power on attempting to recover unrecoverable or non-critical data.

stateDiagram
    [*] --> Full_Power_Operational: Good/Moderate Quality
    Full_Power_Operational --> Low_Power_Mode: Persistent Bad Quality (x > m OR Rmax) OR Low Battery
    Low_Power_Mode --> Prioritize_Critical_Data: Rx discards non-critical data
    Low_Power_Mode --> Reduce_Tx_Activity: Tx sends minimal beacons
    Low_Power_Mode --> Simplified_Symbol_Judgment: Rx reduces processing load
    Low_Power_Mode --> Full_Power_Operational: Quality Recovers AND Battery OK
    style Low_Power_Mode fill:#ffffe0,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px

---

6. Cross-Domain Application: Remote Agricultural Sensor Network for Crop Monitoring

• Enabling Description: The communication quality judging device is integrated into a distributed wireless sensor network deployed across large agricultural fields for precision farming. Sensors monitor parameters like soil moisture, nutrient levels, ambient temperature, and pest presence. The communication channel is typically low-power, long-range wireless (ee.g., LoRaWAN, NB-IoT), susceptible to environmental interference (weather, agricultural machinery). The "data to be transmitted" are periodic sensor readings. A "protected portion" is defined for critical thresholds (e.g., low soil moisture requiring irrigation, high pest count requiring intervention) and sensor identity. Redundant bits with a predetermined value ('1') are added to symbols representing these protected thresholds and IDs. The reception device (R), usually a central gateway, performs symbol judgment (R3) and communication quality judgment (R5). It identifies the number of redundant bits missing their predetermined value (x). If 'x' exceeds a configurable threshold 'n', indicating unreliable data, the data changing means (R5) performs a predetermined change. For critical alerts, it might discard the erroneous alert and trigger a re-request for data from the sensor or cross-reference with adjacent sensor nodes. For general sensor readings, it might replace the bad data with a predicted value based on historical trends (previous data) or mark it as "unreliable" in the farm management system, preventing automated systems from making incorrect decisions (e.g., over-irrigation or unnecessary pesticide application) based on faulty communication.

graph LR
    A[Agricultural Sensor Node] -- Sensor Data --> B{Field Tx Device (T)}
    B -- Encoded Symbols (Protected + Redundant Bits) --> C[LoRaWAN / NB-IoT Wireless Channel]
    C -- Modulated Signal --> D{Central Gateway / Rx Device (R)}
    D -- Baseband Signal --> E{Symbol Judgment (R3)}
    E -- Judged Symbols --> F{Agri-Sensor CQJ (R5)}
    F -- Bad Quality (x > n) --> G{Agri-Sensor Data Changing (R5)}
    G -- Discard / Predict / Flag --> H[Farm Management System]
    style F fill:#ccffcc,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    style G fill:#ccffcc,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px

---

Combination Prior Art Scenarios with Open-Source Standards

The core invention of US Patent 7,804,891, which utilizes redundant bits within symbols to judge communication quality and trigger data changes, can be combined with existing open-source communication standards to render future modifications obvious.

1. Combination with RTP/RTCP (RFC 3550/3551) for VoIP Quality Enhancement:

   • Description: The communication quality judging device and method of US7804891 are implemented within an endpoint participating in a Voice over IP (VoIP) session governed by the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) and RTP Control Protocol (RTCP). The vocoder output data, transmitted as the payload within RTP packets, has its "most important voice data" and "error detection data" (as described in US7804891) designated as "protected portions." Prior to RTP encapsulation, the transmission device's interleaving process unit (T3) adds redundant bits with a predetermined value (e.g., '1') to the symbols representing these protected portions. The receiving VoIP endpoint's reception device (R) then employs its symbol judging means (R3) and communication quality judging means (R5) to analyze these redundant bits within the incoming RTP payloads. The identification of redundant bits missing the predetermined value (x) provides a granular, in-band quality metric for each received audio frame. If this metric indicates poor quality, the data changing means (R5) performs bad frame masking techniques on the RTP payload before it is passed to the audio renderer. This can include: (a) replacing the corrupted audio frame with a repetition of the previous good frame (as per US7804891's step S5), (b) inserting a silent frame, or (c) applying a gradually attenuating gain to the audio signal if multiple bad frames are detected (as per patent specification's alternative bad frame masking). This extends the quality monitoring and error concealment capabilities of standard RTP/RTCP by providing a direct, symbol-level integrity check.

2. Combination with MQTT (OASIS Standard) for Critical IIoT Message Integrity:

   • Description: The communication quality judging method of US7804891 is integrated into an MQTT client, particularly one transmitting or receiving critical industrial IoT (IIoT) messages. The "data to be transmitted" forms the payload of an MQTT PUBLISH message. Within this payload, specific fields containing mission-critical sensor readings (e.g., emergency shutdown triggers, process variable setpoints) or device identifiers are defined as "protected portions." At the MQTT publishing client (or an IIoT gateway acting as a publisher), the application layer or a dedicated shim layer encodes redundant bits with a predetermined value into the multi-level symbols representing these protected payload portions, which are then encapsulated as part of the MQTT message payload. The MQTT subscribing client, acting as the reception device (R), extracts the payload, and its symbol judging step (R3 equivalent) and communication quality judging step (R5 equivalent) identify the number of redundant bits missing their predetermined value (x). This provides an application-specific integrity check complementary to MQTT's inherent Quality of Service (QoS) levels (0, 1, or 2). If 'x' exceeds a pre-configured threshold 'n', the changing data step (R5 equivalent) prevents the corrupted message from being acted upon by the industrial control system. This might involve discarding the message, replacing its content with a last-known-good value from a local cache, or triggering a critical alert to an operator, thereby ensuring that industrial automation systems do not respond to erroneous or compromised MQTT data.

3. Combination with IEEE 802.15.4 (Zigbee Standard) for Reliable Low-Power Control:

   • Description: The device and method for judging communication quality from US7804891 are implemented in nodes within an IEEE 802.15.4 (e.g., Zigbee) low-power wireless personal area network, particularly for applications requiring high reliability for short, periodic data bursts (e.g., smart home security sensors, building automation controls). The "data to be transmitted" includes sensor states (e.g., door open/closed, motion detected) or actuator commands (e.g., turn light on/off) encapsulated within the 802.15.4 MAC frame payload. Within this payload, specific bits representing "protected portions" (e.g., security alarm status, emergency switch activation) are encoded with redundant bits having a predetermined value. At the transmitting 802.15.4 device, the baseband signal generating unit (T4) produces the multi-level symbols for the physical layer, incorporating these redundant bits. The receiving 802.15.4 node's reception device (R) includes a symbol judging means (R3) that processes the incoming 802.15.4 baseband signal and a communication quality judging means (R5) that specifically counts the number of redundant bits missing the predetermined value (x) within the decoded symbols. If 'x' exceeds a defined threshold 'n', the data changing means (R5) takes action, such as preventing a false alarm from being triggered (destroying data), or initiating a retry/acknowledgment request to the transmitting device with an explicit indication of data integrity failure, thus augmenting the basic ACK/NACK mechanisms of 802.15.4 with a fine-grained, in-band payload integrity check.