Invalidity dossier

US 7624438

System and method for providing a secure connection between networked computers

Current assignee: ROCKSTEADY NETWORKS Inc

Added 9/24/2026, 1:46:54 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 7,624,438 B2

Title: System and method for providing a secure connection between networked computers

Patent number / application: US 7,624,438 B2; Application US 10/922,041

Inventors: Eric White and Patrick Turley

Assignee information (as listed): Original assignee listed as "Individual"; assignments recorded to Rocksteady Networks, Inc.; Rocksteady Technologies, LLC; RPX Corporation; and, per the listing, Netskope Inc. as current assignee.

Key dates: Priority date 2003-08-20; filing date 2004-08-19; publication of US20050044350A1 on 2005-02-24; granted 2009-11-24; anticipated expiration 2024-08-19; legal status listed as "Expired - Lifetime."

Purpose: The invention relates generally to computer connectivity, and more particularly to establishing and providing secure connections between computers. One described scenario: a remote client computer wishes to establish a connection with an intranet or a computer within an intranet, and the remote client and a server of the intranet create a VPN so information may be securely transferred.

Plain-language scope: A connection is requested in a first protocol (described as HTTPS). In response, configuration data is sent and executes on the requesting computer to automatically configure a second protocol and establish a secure connection. The request may include a username and password, with data sent only if verified. The data may include a controller, described as an ActiveX controller, and a credential (dynamically generated, valid only for the duration of the secure connection). The second protocol is described as PPTP, configured and established automatically via the controller. The specification notes protocols inherent to particular operating systems may be used to set up the secure connection in automated fashion, requiring no manual intervention or configuration by the user. Figures describe architecture (FIG. 1), a flow diagram (FIG. 2), an applied example (FIG. 3), VPN client software (FIG. 4), and another architecture (FIG. 5).

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7624438/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full claims, full specification, prosecution history, or the complete text of the figures. It does not establish the accuracy of the listed assignees or legal status, which the source itself characterizes as assumptions. It contains no findings on validity, enforceability, infringement, or prior art.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:31:08 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7624438. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.