Invalidity dossier

US 7411180

Solid state image sensor with transparent film on micro-lenses and offsetting positions of micro-lenses and color filters from a central portion of a corresponding light receiving area

Current assignee: Collabo Innovations, Inc.

Added 9/16/2026, 6:46:40 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges1 lawsuit on fileasserted by Collabo Innovations, Inc.

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US7411180B2

Title: Solid state image sensor with transparent film on micro-lenses and offsetting positions of micro-lenses and color filters from a central portion of a corresponding light receiving area

Assignee / Inventors: Original assignee Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd.; inventors Hiroshi Sakoh, Masato Kobayashi, and Nobukazu Teranishi. The source also lists Collabo Innovations Inc. and Panasonic Holdings Corp. as current assignees (Google notes such listings may be inaccurate).

Dates: Priority date 2003-08-04; application US11/783,703 filed 2007-04-11; publication US20070187576A1 on 2007-08-16; granted and published as US7411180B2 on 2008-08-12. Status listed as "Expired – Lifetime," with anticipated expiration 2024-08-03.

Purpose: To enable shortened exit pupil distance in solid-state image sensors while reducing shading. The excerpt explains that as exit pupil distance shortens (e.g., slimmer mobile-phone and digital-still cameras), existing designs offset micro-lenses above peripheral light-receiving elements. If shortening progresses further, light collection in the peripheral portion fails and sensitivity falls toward the image edges (shading), darkening the periphery.

Plain-language scope: The sensor has multiple light-receiving elements in a light-receiving area with corresponding micro-lenses, plus a flattening film over the micro-lenses. At the center, micro-lenses sit directly above their light-receiving elements; farther from center they are progressively offset toward the center. The flattening film's refractive index is less than the micro-lenses'. Micro-lenses may be arranged in a matrix, adjoining without gaps in row and column directions. The sensor may also include in-layer lenses between micro-lenses and light-receiving elements, similarly offset progressively toward the center, with each micro-lens offset greater than its corresponding in-layer lens.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US7411180](/patent/US7411180)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: Full claim language and dependency, complete description, embodiments, drawing details, prosecution history, or the patent's ultimate legal status or enforceability. It also does not establish validity, ownership accuracy, or prior-art relationships.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:03:31 PM

Cases on file (1)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7411180. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Collabo Innovations, Inc.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring