Invalidity dossier

US 7388587

Method for embedding animation in electronic mail and websites

Current assignee: Cine Graphic Solutions LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 6:48:35 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges2 lawsuits on fileasserted by Cine Graphic Solutions LLC

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 7,388,587 B1

Title: Method for embedding animation in electronic mail and websites

Patent number: US 7,388,587 B1
Application number: US 11/586,016
Inventor: Douglas G. Richardson
Original/current assignee listed: Individual
Prior art date: 2005-04-12
Filing date: 2006-10-25
Publication (grant) date: 2008-06-17
Adjusted expiration listed: 2026-07-19
Legal status listed: Active
Classifications: G06T13/00, G06T13/80 (2D animation, e.g., sprites); H04N19/20 and H04N19/27 (video object coding, including synthetic/natural hybrid coding)

Purpose: The patent relates generally to electronic mail and websites and, more specifically, to a method for embedding images in email and websites. It aims to provide an efficient method for transmitting dynamic images, or "movies," over both wired and wireless electronic communication media.

Plain-language scope: Multiple photographs are captured from a camera, typically fixed in position and focal length. The first photograph is the "naked photo." Using a graphics program such as Adobe Photoshop, subsequent photos are edited to select a moving element—for example, a car crossing the field of view—while other moving portions are also edited. The edited images are stored with the naked photo as layers in a graphic file, each layer positioned to correspond to the clipped image's location in its source photo. The modified naked photo is then transmitted with a web-enabled electronic communication such as an email or website. Upon display, the naked photo appears, and each subsequent layer is displayed and removed in the order pasted, with a short delay and at the corresponding location, thereby generating a movie with much smaller files than the prior art.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7388587/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It provides no claim text, so the precise metes and bounds of the claimed invention cannot be stated. It does not establish validity, enforceability, or the accuracy of the assignee, legal-status, or expiration listings. It also does not establish the content of the related applications listed (e.g., US 12/140,060; US 13/232,306), nor the substance of any litigation or ownership transfers.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:42:34 PM

Cases on file (2)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7388587. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Cine Graphic Solutions LLC

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring