Invalidity dossier

US 6694371

Communication interface device and method

Current assignee: Azbil Corp

Added 9/24/2026, 1:47:23 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US6694371B1

Title: Communication interface device and method
Inventor: Daiji Sanai
Original/Current Assignee (as listed): Azbil Corp (originally Yamatake Corporation)
Application No.: US09/144,520 | Filed: 1998-08-31
Priority Date: 1997-09-01 | Granted/Published: 2004-02-17
Legal Status (as listed): Expired – Lifetime (anticipated expiration 2018-08-31)

Purpose: The invention addresses a problem in conventional interface devices that connect a communication object machine (e.g., a process controller using RS232C serial communication) to a management device (e.g., a personal computer with an internet browser using TCP/IP). Such conventional devices required a dedicated driver, a WWW server, and CGI programs tailored to each object machine, demanding a special CPU or large memory and resulting in high cost and non-reusable programs.

Plain-language scope: The invention provides a communication interface device connecting the object machine to a communication network between the machine and a management device. It comprises a socket server for converting signals between the machine and the network, a WWW server connected to the network, and a memory connected to the WWW server. The memory stores an application program (e.g., JAVA applet, JAVA Beans, Active X) transferred to the management device according to a client program (typically an internet browser) and executed on that client program. Communication between the object machine and management device then occurs via the socket server, eliminating the dedicated driver and allowing the interface to work with various machines by merely changing the application program. The invention also covers the communication object machine itself (incorporating socket server, WWW server, and memory) and a corresponding communication method. Figures 1–6 illustrate the interface device, WWW/socket server functions, and multi-machine configurations.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US6694371](/patent/US6694371)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full claims, complete detailed description, all drawing content, prosecution history, or the full text of the communication method steps (the method section is truncated). It does not establish validity, litigation, or ownership transfer accuracy, and the stated legal status is expressly an assumption, not a legal conclusion.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:31:05 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6694371. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.